Traits: Defining Shared Behavior
A trait defines the functionality a particular type has and can share with other types. We can use traits to define shared behavior in an abstract way. We can use trait bounds to specify that a generic type can be any type that has certain behavior.
Note: Traits are similar to a feature often called interfaces in other languages, although with some differences.
Defining a Trait
A type’s behavior consists of the methods we can call on that type. Different types share the same behavior if we can call the same methods on all of those types. Trait definitions are a way to group method signatures together to define a set of behaviors necessary to accomplish some purpose.
For example, let’s say we have multiple structs that hold various kinds and amounts of text: a NewsArticle
struct that holds a news story filed in a particular location and a Tweet
that can have, at most, 280 characters along with metadata that indicates whether it was a new tweet, a retweet, or a reply to another tweet.
We want to make a media aggregator library crate named aggregator
that can display summaries of data that might be stored in a NewsArticle
or Tweet
instance. To do this, we need a summary from each type, and we’ll request that summary by calling a summarize
method on an instance. Listing 10-12 shows the definition of a public Summary
trait that expresses this behavior.
Filename: src/lib.rs
pub trait Summary {
fn summarize(&self) -> String;
}
Listing 10-12: A Summary
trait that consists of the behavior provided by a summarize
method
Here, we declare a trait using the trait
keyword and then the trait’s name, which is Summary
in this case. We also declare the trait as pub
so that crates depending on this crate can make use of this trait too, as we’ll see in a few examples. Inside the curly brackets, we declare the method signatures that describe the behaviors of the types that implement this trait, which in this case is fn summarize(&self) -> String
.
After the method signature, instead of providing an implementation within curly brackets, we use a semicolon. Each type implementing this trait must provide its own custom behavior for the body of the method. The compiler will enforce that any type that has the Summary
trait will have the method summarize
defined with this signature exactly.
A trait can have multiple methods in its body: the method signatures are listed one per line, and each line ends in a semicolon.
Implementing a Trait on a Type
Now that we’ve defined the desired signatures of the Summary
trait’s methods, we can implement it on the types in our media aggregator. Listing 10-13 shows an implementation of the Summary
trait on the NewsArticle
struct that uses the headline, the author, and the location to create the return value of summarize
. For the Tweet
struct, we define summarize
as the username followed by the entire text of the tweet, assuming that the tweet content is already limited to 280 characters.
Filename: src/lib.rs
pub trait Summary {
fn summarize(&self) -> String;
}
pub struct NewsArticle {
pub headline: String,
pub location: String,
pub author: String,
pub content: String,
}
impl Summary for NewsArticle {
fn summarize(&self) -> String {
format!("{}, by {} ({})", self.headline, self.author, self.location)
}
}
pub struct Tweet {
pub username: String,
pub content: String,
pub reply: bool,
pub retweet: bool,
}
impl Summary for Tweet {
fn summarize(&self) -> String {
format!("{}: {}", self.username, self.content)
}
}
Listing 10-13: Implementing the Summary
trait on the NewsArticle
and Tweet
types
Implementing a trait on a type is similar to implementing regular methods. The difference is that after impl
, we put the trait name we want to implement, then use the for
keyword, and then specify the name of the type we want to implement the trait for. Within the impl
block, we put the method signatures that the trait definition has defined. Instead of adding a semicolon after each signature, we use curly brackets and fill in the method body with the specific behavior that we want the methods of the trait to have for the particular type.
Now that the library has implemented the Summary
trait on NewsArticle
and Tweet
, users of the crate can call the trait methods on instances of NewsArticle
and Tweet
in the same way we call regular methods. The only difference is that the user must bring the trait into scope as well as the types. Here’s an example of how a binary crate could use our aggregator
library crate:
use aggregator::{Summary, Tweet};
fn main() {
let tweet = Tweet {
username: String::from("horse_ebooks"),
content: String::from(
"of course, as you probably already know, people",
),
reply: false,
retweet: false,
};
println!("1 new tweet: {}", tweet.summarize());
}
This code prints 1 new tweet: horse_ebooks: of course, as you probably already know, people
.
Other crates that depend on the aggregator
crate can also bring the Summary
trait into scope to implement Summary
on their own types. One restriction to note is that we can implement a trait on a type only if either the trait or the type, or both, are local to our crate. For example, we can implement standard library traits like Display
on a custom type like Tweet
as part of our aggregator
crate functionality because the type Tweet
is local to our aggregator
crate. We can also implement Summary
on Vec<T>
in our aggregator
crate because the trait Summary
is local to our aggregator
crate.
But we can’t implement external traits on external types. For example, we can’t implement the Display
trait on Vec<T>
within our aggregator
crate because Display
and Vec<T>
are both defined in the standard library and aren’t local to our aggregator
crate. This restriction is part of a property called coherence, and more specifically the orphan rule, so named because the parent type is not present. This rule ensures that other people’s code can’t break your code and vice versa. Without the rule, two crates could implement the same trait for the same type, and Rust wouldn’t know which implementation to use.
Default Implementations
Sometimes it’s useful to have default behavior for some or all of the methods in a trait instead of requiring implementations for all methods on every type. Then, as we implement the trait on a particular type, we can keep or override each method’s default behavior.
In Listing 10-14, we specify a default string for the summarize
method of the Summary
trait instead of only defining the method signature, as we did in Listing 10-12.
Filename: src/lib.rs
pub trait Summary {
fn summarize(&self) -> String {
String::from("(Read more...)")
}
}
pub struct NewsArticle {
pub headline: String,
pub location: String,
pub author: String,
pub content: String,
}
impl Summary for NewsArticle {}
pub struct Tweet {
pub username: String,
pub content: String,
pub reply: bool,
pub retweet: bool,
}
impl Summary for Tweet {
fn summarize(&self) -> String {
format!("{}: {}", self.username, self.content)
}
}
Listing 10-14: Defining a Summary
trait with a default implementation of the summarize
method
To use a default implementation to summarize instances of NewsArticle
, we specify an empty impl
block with impl Summary for NewsArticle {}
.
Even though we’re no longer defining the summarize
method on NewsArticle
directly, we’ve provided a default implementation and specified that NewsArticle
implements the Summary
trait. As a result, we can still call the summarize
method on an instance of NewsArticle
, like this:
use aggregator::{self, NewsArticle, Summary};
fn main() {
let article = NewsArticle {
headline: String::from("Penguins win the Stanley Cup Championship!"),
location: String::from("Pittsburgh, PA, USA"),
author: String::from("Iceburgh"),
content: String::from(
"The Pittsburgh Penguins once again are the best \
hockey team in the NHL.",
),
};
println!("New article available! {}", article.summarize());
}
This code prints New article available! (Read more...)
.
Creating a default implementation doesn’t require us to change anything about the implementation of Summary
on Tweet
in Listing 10-13. The reason is that the syntax for overriding a default implementation is the same as the syntax for implementing a trait method that doesn’t have a default implementation.
Default implementations can call other methods in the same trait, even if those other methods don’t have a default implementation. In this way, a trait can provide a lot of useful functionality and only require implementors to specify a small part of it. For example, we could define the Summary
trait to have a summarize_author
method whose implementation is required, and then define a summarize
method that has a default implementation that calls the summarize_author
method:
pub trait Summary {
fn summarize_author(&self) -> String;
fn summarize(&self) -> String {
format!("(Read more from {}...)", self.summarize_author())
}
}
pub struct Tweet {
pub username: String,
pub content: String,
pub reply: bool,
pub retweet: bool,
}
impl Summary for Tweet {
fn summarize_author(&self) -> String {
format!("@{}", self.username)
}
}
To use this version of Summary
, we only need to define summarize_author
when we implement the trait on a type:
pub trait Summary {
fn summarize_author(&self) -> String;
fn summarize(&self) -> String {
format!("(Read more from {}...)", self.summarize_author())
}
}
pub struct Tweet {
pub username: String,
pub content: String,
pub reply: bool,
pub retweet: bool,
}
impl Summary for Tweet {
fn summarize_author(&self) -> String {
format!("@{}", self.username)
}
}
After we define summarize_author
, we can call summarize
on instances of the Tweet
struct, and the default implementation of summarize
will call the definition of summarize_author
that we’ve provided. Because we’ve implemented summarize_author
, the Summary
trait has given us the behavior of the summarize
method without requiring us to write any more code. Here’s what that looks like:
use aggregator::{self, Summary, Tweet};
fn main() {
let tweet = Tweet {
username: String::from("horse_ebooks"),
content: String::from(
"of course, as you probably already know, people",
),
reply: false,
retweet: false,
};
println!("1 new tweet: {}", tweet.summarize());
}
This code prints 1 new tweet: (Read more from @horse_ebooks...)
.
Note that it isn’t possible to call the default implementation from an overriding implementation of that same method.
Traits as Parameters
Now that you know how to define and implement traits, we can explore how to use traits to define functions that accept many different types. We’ll use the Summary
trait we implemented on the NewsArticle
and Tweet
types in Listing 10-13 to define a notify
function that calls the summarize
method on its item
parameter, which is of some type that implements the Summary
trait. To do this, we use the impl Trait
syntax, like this:
pub trait Summary {
fn summarize(&self) -> String;
}
pub struct NewsArticle {
pub headline: String,
pub location: String,
pub author: String,
pub content: String,
}
impl Summary for NewsArticle {
fn summarize(&self) -> String {
format!("{}, by {} ({})", self.headline, self.author, self.location)
}
}
pub struct Tweet {
pub username: String,
pub content: String,
pub reply: bool,
pub retweet: bool,
}
impl Summary for Tweet {
fn summarize(&self) -> String {
format!("{}: {}", self.username, self.content)
}
}
pub fn notify(item: &impl Summary) {
println!("Breaking news! {}", item.summarize());
}
Instead of a concrete type for the item
parameter, we specify the impl
keyword and the trait name. This parameter accepts any type that implements the specified trait. In the body of notify
, we can call any methods on item
that come from the Summary
trait, such as summarize
. We can call notify
and pass in any instance of NewsArticle
or Tweet
. Code that calls the function with any other type, such as a String
or an i32
, won’t compile because those types don’t implement Summary
.
Trait Bound Syntax
The impl Trait
syntax works for straightforward cases but is actually syntax sugar for a longer form known as a trait bound; it looks like this:
pub fn notify<T: Summary>(item: &T) {
println!("Breaking news! {}", item.summarize());
}
This longer form is equivalent to the example in the previous section but is more verbose. We place trait bounds with the declaration of the generic type parameter after a colon and inside angle brackets.
The impl Trait
syntax is convenient and makes for more concise code in simple cases, while the fuller trait bound syntax can express more complexity in other cases. For example, we can have two parameters that implement Summary
. Doing so with the impl Trait
syntax looks like this:
pub fn notify(item1: &impl Summary, item2: &impl Summary) {
Using impl Trait
is appropriate if we want this function to allow item1
and item2
to have different types (as long as both types implement Summary
). If we want to force both parameters to have the same type, however, we must use a trait bound, like this:
pub fn notify<T: Summary>(item1: &T, item2: &T) {
The generic type T
specified as the type of the item1
and item2
parameters constrains the function such that the concrete type of the value passed as an argument for item1
and item2
must be the same.
Specifying Multiple Trait Bounds with the + Syntax
We can also specify more than one trait bound. Say we wanted notify
to use display formatting as well as summarize
on item
: we specify in the notify
definition that item
must implement both Display
and Summary
. We can do so using the +
syntax:
pub fn notify(item: &(impl Summary + Display)) {
The +
syntax is also valid with trait bounds on generic types:
pub fn notify<T: Summary + Display>(item: &T) {
With the two trait bounds specified, the body of notify
can call summarize
and use {}
to format item
.
Clearer Trait Bounds with where Clauses
Using too many trait bounds has its downsides. Each generic has its own trait bounds, so functions with multiple generic type parameters can contain lots of trait bound information between the function’s name and its parameter list, making the function signature hard to read. For this reason, Rust has alternate syntax for specifying trait bounds inside a where
clause after the function signature. So, instead of writing this:
fn some_function<T: Display + Clone, U: Clone + Debug>(t: &T, u: &U) -> i32 {
we can use a where
clause, like this:
fn some_function<T, U>(t: &T, u: &U) -> i32
where
T: Display + Clone,
U: Clone + Debug,
{
unimplemented!()
}
This function’s signature is less cluttered: the function name, parameter list, and return type are close together, similar to a function without lots of trait bounds.
Returning Types That Implement Traits
We can also use the impl Trait
syntax in the return position to return a value of some type that implements a trait, as shown here:
pub trait Summary {
fn summarize(&self) -> String;
}
pub struct NewsArticle {
pub headline: String,
pub location: String,
pub author: String,
pub content: String,
}
impl Summary for NewsArticle {
fn summarize(&self) -> String {
format!("{}, by {} ({})", self.headline, self.author, self.location)
}
}
pub struct Tweet {
pub username: String,
pub content: String,
pub reply: bool,
pub retweet: bool,
}
impl Summary for Tweet {
fn summarize(&self) -> String {
format!("{}: {}", self.username, self.content)
}
}
fn returns_summarizable() -> impl Summary {
Tweet {
username: String::from("horse_ebooks"),
content: String::from(
"of course, as you probably already know, people",
),
reply: false,
retweet: false,
}
}
By using impl Summary
for the return type, we specify that the returns_summarizable
function returns some type that implements the Summary
trait without naming the concrete type. In this case, returns_summarizable
returns a Tweet
, but the code calling this function doesn’t need to know that.
The ability to specify a return type only by the trait it implements is especially useful in the context of closures and iterators, which we cover in Chapter 13. Closures and iterators create types that only the compiler knows or types that are very long to specify. The impl Trait
syntax lets you concisely specify that a function returns some type that implements the Iterator
trait without needing to write out a very long type.
However, you can only use impl Trait
if you’re returning a single type. For example, this code that returns either a NewsArticle
or a Tweet
with the return type specified as impl Summary
wouldn’t work:
pub trait Summary {
fn summarize(&self) -> String;
}
pub struct NewsArticle {
pub headline: String,
pub location: String,
pub author: String,
pub content: String,
}
impl Summary for NewsArticle {
fn summarize(&self) -> String {
format!("{}, by {} ({})", self.headline, self.author, self.location)
}
}
pub struct Tweet {
pub username: String,
pub content: String,
pub reply: bool,
pub retweet: bool,
}
impl Summary for Tweet {
fn summarize(&self) -> String {
format!("{}: {}", self.username, self.content)
}
}
fn returns_summarizable(switch: bool) -> impl Summary {
if switch {
NewsArticle {
headline: String::from(
"Penguins win the Stanley Cup Championship!",
),
location: String::from("Pittsburgh, PA, USA"),
author: String::from("Iceburgh"),
content: String::from(
"The Pittsburgh Penguins once again are the best \
hockey team in the NHL.",
),
}
} else {
Tweet {
username: String::from("horse_ebooks"),
content: String::from(
"of course, as you probably already know, people",
),
reply: false,
retweet: false,
}
}
}
Returning either a NewsArticle
or a Tweet
isn’t allowed due to restrictions around how the impl Trait
syntax is implemented in the compiler. We’ll cover how to write a function with this behavior in the “Using Trait Objects That Allow for Values of Different Types” section of Chapter 17.
Using Trait Bounds to Conditionally Implement Methods
By using a trait bound with an impl
block that uses generic type parameters, we can implement methods conditionally for types that implement the specified traits. For example, the type Pair<T>
in Listing 10-15 always implements the new
function to return a new instance of Pair<T>
(recall from the “Defining Methods” section of Chapter 5 that Self
is a type alias for the type of the impl
block, which in this case is Pair<T>
). But in the next impl
block, Pair<T>
only implements the cmp_display
method if its inner type T
implements the PartialOrd
trait that enables comparison and the Display
trait that enables printing.
Filename: src/lib.rs
use std::fmt::Display;
struct Pair<T> {
x: T,
y: T,
}
impl<T> Pair<T> {
fn new(x: T, y: T) -> Self {
Self { x, y }
}
}
impl<T: Display + PartialOrd> Pair<T> {
fn cmp_display(&self) {
if self.x >= self.y {
println!("The largest member is x = {}", self.x);
} else {
println!("The largest member is y = {}", self.y);
}
}
}
Listing 10-15: Conditionally implementing methods on a generic type depending on trait bounds
We can also conditionally implement a trait for any type that implements another trait. Implementations of a trait on any type that satisfies the trait bounds are called blanket implementations and are used extensively in the Rust standard library. For example, the standard library implements the ToString
trait on any type that implements the Display
trait. The impl
block in the standard library looks similar to this code:
impl<T: Display> ToString for T {
// --snip--
}
Because the standard library has this blanket implementation, we can call the to_string
method defined by the ToString
trait on any type that implements the Display
trait. For example, we can turn integers into their corresponding String
values like this because integers implement Display
:
#![allow(unused)]
fn main() {
let s = 3.to_string();
}
Blanket implementations appear in the documentation for the trait in the “Implementors” section.
Traits and trait bounds let us write code that uses generic type parameters to reduce duplication but also specify to the compiler that we want the generic type to have particular behavior. The compiler can then use the trait bound information to check that all the concrete types used with our code provide the correct behavior. In dynamically typed languages, we would get an error at runtime if we called a method on a type which didn’t define the method. But Rust moves these errors to compile time so we’re forced to fix the problems before our code is even able to run. Additionally, we don’t have to write code that checks for behavior at runtime because we’ve already checked at compile time. Doing so improves performance without having to give up the flexibility of generics.