Schema Routing Rules
<< Transport Security Model Schema Management >>
The Vitess routing rules feature is a powerful mechanism for directing traffic to the right keyspaces, shards or tablet types. It fulfils the following use cases:
- Routing traffic during resharding: During resharding, you can specify rules that decide where to send reads and writes. For example, you can move traffic from the source shard to the destination shards, but only for the
rdonly
orreplica
types. This gives you the option to try out the new shards and make sure they will work as intended before committing to move the rest of the traffic. - Table equivalence: The new VReplication feature allows you to materialize tables in different keyspaces. In this situation, you can specify that two tables are ‘equivalent’. This will allow VTGate to use the best possible plan depending on the input query.
ApplyRoutingRules
You can use the vtctlclient command to apply routing rules:
ApplyRoutingRules {-rules=<rules> || -rules_file=<rules_json_file>} [-cells=c1,c2,...] [-skip_rebuild] [-dry-run]
Syntax
Resharding
Routing rules can be specified using JSON format. Here’s an example:
{"rules": [
{
"from_table": "t@rdonly",
"to_tables": ["target.t"]
}, {
"from_table": "target.t",
"to_tables": ["source.t"]
}, {
"from_table": "t",
"to_tables": ["source.t"]
}
]}
The above JSON specifies the following rules:
- If you sent a query accessing
t
for anrdonly
instance, then it would be sent to tablet
in thetarget
keyspace. - If you sent a query accessing
target.t
for anything other thanrdonly
, it would be sentt
in thesource
keyspace. - If you sent a query accessing
t
without any qualification, it would be sent tot
in thesource
keyspace.
These rules are an example of how they can be used to shift traffic for a table during a vertical resharding process. In this case, the assumption is that we are moving t
from source
to target
, and so far, we’ve shifted traffic for just the rdonly
tablet types.
By updating these rules, you can eventually move all traffic to target.t
The rules are applied only once. The resulting targets need to specify fully qualified table names.
Table equivalence
The routing rules allow you to specify table equivalence. Here’s an example:
{"rules": [
{
"from_table": "product",
"to_tables": ["lookup.product", "user.uproduct"]
}
]}
In the above case, we are declaring that the product
table is present in both lookup
and user
. If a query is issued using the unqualified product
table, then VTGate will consider sending the query to both lookup.product
as well as user.uproduct
(note the name change).
For example, if user
was a sharded keyspace, and the query joined a user
table with product
, then vtgate will know that it’s better to send the query to the user
keyspace instead of lookup
.
Typically, table equivalence makes sense when a view table is materialized from a source table using VReplication.
Orthogonality
The tablet type targeting and table equivalence features are orthogonal to each other and can be combined. Although there’s no immediate use case for this, it’s a possibility we can consider if the use case arises.