Recoverable Errors with Result
Most errors aren’t serious enough to require the program to stop entirely. Sometimes, when a function fails, it’s for a reason that you can easily interpret and respond to. For example, if you try to open a file and that operation fails because the file doesn’t exist, you might want to create the file instead of terminating the process.
Recall from “Handling Potential Failure with the Result
Type” in Chapter 2 that the Result
enum is defined as having two variants, Ok
and Err
, as follows:
#![allow(unused)]
fn main() {
enum Result<T, E> {
Ok(T),
Err(E),
}
}
The T
and E
are generic type parameters: we’ll discuss generics in more detail in Chapter 10. What you need to know right now is that T
represents the type of the value that will be returned in a success case within the Ok
variant, and E
represents the type of the error that will be returned in a failure case within the Err
variant. Because Result
has these generic type parameters, we can use the Result
type and the functions defined on it in many different situations where the successful value and error value we want to return may differ.
Let’s call a function that returns a Result
value because the function could fail. In Listing 9-3 we try to open a file.
Filename: src/main.rs
use std::fs::File;
fn main() {
let greeting_file_result = File::open("hello.txt");
}
Listing 9-3: Opening a file
The return type of File::open
is a Result
. The generic parameter T
has been filled in by the implementation of File::open
with the type of the success value, std::fs::File
, which is a file handle. The type of E
used in the error value is std::io::Error
. This return type means the call to File::open
might succeed and return a file handle that we can read from or write to. The function call also might fail: for example, the file might not exist, or we might not have permission to access the file. The File::open
function needs to have a way to tell us whether it succeeded or failed and at the same time give us either the file handle or error information. This information is exactly what the Result
enum conveys.
In the case where File::open
succeeds, the value in the variable greeting_file_result
will be an instance of Ok
that contains a file handle. In the case where it fails, the value in greeting_file_result
will be an instance of Err
that contains more information about the kind of error that happened.
We need to add to the code in Listing 9-3 to take different actions depending on the value File::open
returns. Listing 9-4 shows one way to handle the Result
using a basic tool, the match
expression that we discussed in Chapter 6.
Filename: src/main.rs
use std::fs::File;
fn main() {
let greeting_file_result = File::open("hello.txt");
let greeting_file = match greeting_file_result {
Ok(file) => file,
Err(error) => panic!("Problem opening the file: {:?}", error),
};
}
Listing 9-4: Using a match
expression to handle the Result
variants that might be returned
Note that, like the Option
enum, the Result
enum and its variants have been brought into scope by the prelude, so we don’t need to specify Result::
before the Ok
and Err
variants in the match
arms.
When the result is Ok
, this code will return the inner file
value out of the Ok
variant, and we then assign that file handle value to the variable greeting_file
. After the match
, we can use the file handle for reading or writing.
The other arm of the match
handles the case where we get an Err
value from File::open
. In this example, we’ve chosen to call the panic!
macro. If there’s no file named hello.txt in our current directory and we run this code, we’ll see the following output from the panic!
macro:
$ cargo run
Compiling error-handling v0.1.0 (file:///projects/error-handling)
Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.73s
Running `target/debug/error-handling`
thread 'main' panicked at 'Problem opening the file: Os { code: 2, kind: NotFound, message: "No such file or directory" }', src/main.rs:8:23
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
As usual, this output tells us exactly what has gone wrong.
Matching on Different Errors
The code in Listing 9-4 will panic!
no matter why File::open
failed. However, we want to take different actions for different failure reasons: if File::open
failed because the file doesn’t exist, we want to create the file and return the handle to the new file. If File::open
failed for any other reason—for example, because we didn’t have permission to open the file—we still want the code to panic!
in the same way as it did in Listing 9-4. For this we add an inner match
expression, shown in Listing 9-5.
Filename: src/main.rs
use std::fs::File;
use std::io::ErrorKind;
fn main() {
let greeting_file_result = File::open("hello.txt");
let greeting_file = match greeting_file_result {
Ok(file) => file,
Err(error) => match error.kind() {
ErrorKind::NotFound => match File::create("hello.txt") {
Ok(fc) => fc,
Err(e) => panic!("Problem creating the file: {:?}", e),
},
other_error => {
panic!("Problem opening the file: {:?}", other_error);
}
},
};
}
Listing 9-5: Handling different kinds of errors in different ways
The type of the value that File::open
returns inside the Err
variant is io::Error
, which is a struct provided by the standard library. This struct has a method kind
that we can call to get an io::ErrorKind
value. The enum io::ErrorKind
is provided by the standard library and has variants representing the different kinds of errors that might result from an io
operation. The variant we want to use is ErrorKind::NotFound
, which indicates the file we’re trying to open doesn’t exist yet. So we match on greeting_file_result
, but we also have an inner match on error.kind()
.
The condition we want to check in the inner match is whether the value returned by error.kind()
is the NotFound
variant of the ErrorKind
enum. If it is, we try to create the file with File::create
. However, because File::create
could also fail, we need a second arm in the inner match
expression. When the file can’t be created, a different error message is printed. The second arm of the outer match
stays the same, so the program panics on any error besides the missing file error.
Alternatives to Using
match
withResult
That’s a lot of
match
! Thematch
expression is very useful but also very much a primitive. In Chapter 13, you’ll learn about closures, which are used with many of the methods defined onResult
. These methods can be more concise than usingmatch
when handlingResult
values in your code.For example, here’s another way to write the same logic as shown in Listing 9-5, this time using closures and the
unwrap_or_else
method:
use std::fs::File;
use std::io::ErrorKind;
fn main() {
let greeting_file = File::open("hello.txt").unwrap_or_else(|error| {
if error.kind() == ErrorKind::NotFound {
File::create("hello.txt").unwrap_or_else(|error| {
panic!("Problem creating the file: {:?}", error);
})
} else {
panic!("Problem opening the file: {:?}", error);
}
});
}
Although this code has the same behavior as Listing 9-5, it doesn’t contain any
match
expressions and is cleaner to read. Come back to this example after you’ve read Chapter 13, and look up theunwrap_or_else
method in the standard library documentation. Many more of these methods can clean up huge nestedmatch
expressions when you’re dealing with errors.
Shortcuts for Panic on Error: unwrap
and expect
Using match
works well enough, but it can be a bit verbose and doesn’t always communicate intent well. The Result
type has many helper methods defined on it to do various, more specific tasks. The unwrap
method is a shortcut method implemented just like the match
expression we wrote in Listing 9-4. If the Result
value is the Ok
variant, unwrap
will return the value inside the Ok
. If the Result
is the Err
variant, unwrap
will call the panic!
macro for us. Here is an example of unwrap
in action:
Filename: src/main.rs
use std::fs::File;
fn main() {
let greeting_file = File::open("hello.txt").unwrap();
}
If we run this code without a hello.txt file, we’ll see an error message from the panic!
call that the unwrap
method makes:
thread 'main' panicked at 'called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: Os {
code: 2, kind: NotFound, message: "No such file or directory" }',
src/main.rs:4:49
Similarly, the expect
method lets us also choose the panic!
error message. Using expect
instead of unwrap
and providing good error messages can convey your intent and make tracking down the source of a panic easier. The syntax of expect
looks like this:
Filename: src/main.rs
use std::fs::File;
fn main() {
let greeting_file = File::open("hello.txt")
.expect("hello.txt should be included in this project");
}
We use expect
in the same way as unwrap
: to return the file handle or call the panic!
macro. The error message used by expect
in its call to panic!
will be the parameter that we pass to expect
, rather than the default panic!
message that unwrap
uses. Here’s what it looks like:
thread 'main' panicked at 'hello.txt should be included in this project: Os {
code: 2, kind: NotFound, message: "No such file or directory" }',
src/main.rs:5:10
In production-quality code, most Rustaceans choose expect
rather than unwrap
and give more context about why the operation is expected to always succeed. That way, if your assumptions are ever proven wrong, you have more information to use in debugging.
Propagating Errors
When a function’s implementation calls something that might fail, instead of handling the error within the function itself, you can return the error to the calling code so that it can decide what to do. This is known as propagating the error and gives more control to the calling code, where there might be more information or logic that dictates how the error should be handled than what you have available in the context of your code.
For example, Listing 9-6 shows a function that reads a username from a file. If the file doesn’t exist or can’t be read, this function will return those errors to the code that called the function.
Filename: src/main.rs
#![allow(unused)]
fn main() {
use std::fs::File;
use std::io::{self, Read};
fn read_username_from_file() -> Result<String, io::Error> {
let username_file_result = File::open("hello.txt");
let mut username_file = match username_file_result {
Ok(file) => file,
Err(e) => return Err(e),
};
let mut username = String::new();
match username_file.read_to_string(&mut username) {
Ok(_) => Ok(username),
Err(e) => Err(e),
}
}
}
Listing 9-6: A function that returns errors to the calling code using match
This function can be written in a much shorter way, but we’re going to start by doing a lot of it manually in order to explore error handling; at the end, we’ll show the shorter way. Let’s look at the return type of the function first: Result
. This means the function is returning a value of the type Result
where the generic parameter T
has been filled in with the concrete type String
, and the generic type E
has been filled in with the concrete type io::Error
.
If this function succeeds without any problems, the code that calls this function will receive an Ok
value that holds a String
—the username that this function read from the file. If this function encounters any problems, the calling code will receive an Err
value that holds an instance of io::Error
that contains more information about what the problems were. We chose io::Error
as the return type of this function because that happens to be the type of the error value returned from both of the operations we’re calling in this function’s body that might fail: the File::open
function and the read_to_string
method.
The body of the function starts by calling the File::open
function. Then we handle the Result
value with a match
similar to the match
in Listing 9-4. If File::open
succeeds, the file handle in the pattern variable file
becomes the value in the mutable variable username_file
and the function continues. In the Err
case, instead of calling panic!
, we use the return
keyword to return early out of the function entirely and pass the error value from File::open
, now in the pattern variable e
, back to the calling code as this function’s error value.
So if we have a file handle in username_file
, the function then creates a new String
in variable username
and calls the read_to_string
method on the file handle in username_file
to read the contents of the file into username
. The read_to_string
method also returns a Result
because it might fail, even though File::open
succeeded. So we need another match
to handle that Result
: if read_to_string
succeeds, then our function has succeeded, and we return the username from the file that’s now in username
wrapped in an Ok
. If read_to_string
fails, we return the error value in the same way that we returned the error value in the match
that handled the return value of File::open
. However, we don’t need to explicitly say return
, because this is the last expression in the function.
The code that calls this code will then handle getting either an Ok
value that contains a username or an Err
value that contains an io::Error
. It’s up to the calling code to decide what to do with those values. If the calling code gets an Err
value, it could call panic!
and crash the program, use a default username, or look up the username from somewhere other than a file, for example. We don’t have enough information on what the calling code is actually trying to do, so we propagate all the success or error information upward for it to handle appropriately.
This pattern of propagating errors is so common in Rust that Rust provides the question mark operator ?
to make this easier.
A Shortcut for Propagating Errors: the ?
Operator
Listing 9-7 shows an implementation of read_username_from_file
that has the same functionality as in Listing 9-6, but this implementation uses the ?
operator.
Filename: src/main.rs
#![allow(unused)]
fn main() {
use std::fs::File;
use std::io;
use std::io::Read;
fn read_username_from_file() -> Result<String, io::Error> {
let mut username_file = File::open("hello.txt")?;
let mut username = String::new();
username_file.read_to_string(&mut username)?;
Ok(username)
}
}
Listing 9-7: A function that returns errors to the calling code using the ?
operator
The ?
placed after a Result
value is defined to work in almost the same way as the match
expressions we defined to handle the Result
values in Listing 9-6. If the value of the Result
is an Ok
, the value inside the Ok
will get returned from this expression, and the program will continue. If the value is an Err
, the Err
will be returned from the whole function as if we had used the return
keyword so the error value gets propagated to the calling code.
There is a difference between what the match
expression from Listing 9-6 does and what the ?
operator does: error values that have the ?
operator called on them go through the from
function, defined in the From
trait in the standard library, which is used to convert values from one type into another. When the ?
operator calls the from
function, the error type received is converted into the error type defined in the return type of the current function. This is useful when a function returns one error type to represent all the ways a function might fail, even if parts might fail for many different reasons.
For example, we could change the read_username_from_file
function in Listing 9-7 to return a custom error type named OurError
that we define. If we also define impl From
to construct an instance of OurError
from an io::Error
, then the ?
operator calls in the body of read_username_from_file
will call from
and convert the error types without needing to add any more code to the function.
In the context of Listing 9-7, the ?
at the end of the File::open
call will return the value inside an Ok
to the variable username_file
. If an error occurs, the ?
operator will return early out of the whole function and give any Err
value to the calling code. The same thing applies to the ?
at the end of the read_to_string
call.
The ?
operator eliminates a lot of boilerplate and makes this function’s implementation simpler. We could even shorten this code further by chaining method calls immediately after the ?
, as shown in Listing 9-8.
Filename: src/main.rs
#![allow(unused)]
fn main() {
use std::fs::File;
use std::io;
use std::io::Read;
fn read_username_from_file() -> Result<String, io::Error> {
let mut username = String::new();
File::open("hello.txt")?.read_to_string(&mut username)?;
Ok(username)
}
}
Listing 9-8: Chaining method calls after the ?
operator
We’ve moved the creation of the new String
in username
to the beginning of the function; that part hasn’t changed. Instead of creating a variable username_file
, we’ve chained the call to read_to_string
directly onto the result of File::open("hello.txt")?
. We still have a ?
at the end of the read_to_string
call, and we still return an Ok
value containing username
when both File::open
and read_to_string
succeed rather than returning errors. The functionality is again the same as in Listing 9-6 and Listing 9-7; this is just a different, more ergonomic way to write it.
Listing 9-9 shows a way to make this even shorter using fs::read_to_string
.
Filename: src/main.rs
#![allow(unused)]
fn main() {
use std::fs;
use std::io;
fn read_username_from_file() -> Result<String, io::Error> {
fs::read_to_string("hello.txt")
}
}
Listing 9-9: Using fs::read_to_string
instead of opening and then reading the file
Reading a file into a string is a fairly common operation, so the standard library provides the convenient fs::read_to_string
function that opens the file, creates a new String
, reads the contents of the file, puts the contents into that String
, and returns it. Of course, using fs::read_to_string
doesn’t give us the opportunity to explain all the error handling, so we did it the longer way first.
Where The ?
Operator Can Be Used
The ?
operator can only be used in functions whose return type is compatible with the value the ?
is used on. This is because the ?
operator is defined to perform an early return of a value out of the function, in the same manner as the match
expression we defined in Listing 9-6. In Listing 9-6, the match
was using a Result
value, and the early return arm returned an Err(e)
value. The return type of the function has to be a Result
so that it’s compatible with this return
.
In Listing 9-10, let’s look at the error we’ll get if we use the ?
operator in a main
function with a return type incompatible with the type of the value we use ?
on:
Filename: src/main.rs
use std::fs::File;
fn main() {
let greeting_file = File::open("hello.txt")?;
}
Listing 9-10: Attempting to use the ?
in the main
function that returns ()
won’t compile
This code opens a file, which might fail. The ?
operator follows the Result
value returned by File::open
, but this main
function has the return type of ()
, not Result
. When we compile this code, we get the following error message:
$ cargo run
Compiling error-handling v0.1.0 (file:///projects/error-handling)
error[E0277]: the `?` operator can only be used in a function that returns `Result` or `Option` (or another type that implements `FromResidual`)
--> src/main.rs:4:48
|
3 | / fn main() {
4 | | let greeting_file = File::open("hello.txt")?;
| | ^ cannot use the `?` operator in a function that returns `()`
5 | | }
| |_- this function should return `Result` or `Option` to accept `?`
|
= help: the trait `FromResidual<Result<Infallible, std::io::Error>>` is not implemented for `()`
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0277`.
error: could not compile `error-handling` due to previous error
This error points out that we’re only allowed to use the ?
operator in a function that returns Result
, Option
, or another type that implements FromResidual
.
To fix the error, you have two choices. One choice is to change the return type of your function to be compatible with the value you’re using the ?
operator on as long as you have no restrictions preventing that. The other technique is to use a match
or one of the Result
methods to handle the Result
in whatever way is appropriate.
The error message also mentioned that ?
can be used with Option
values as well. As with using ?
on Result
, you can only use ?
on Option
in a function that returns an Option
. The behavior of the ?
operator when called on an Option
is similar to its behavior when called on a Result
: if the value is None
, the None
will be returned early from the function at that point. If the value is Some
, the value inside the Some
is the resulting value of the expression and the function continues. Listing 9-11 has an example of a function that finds the last character of the first line in the given text:
fn last_char_of_first_line(text: &str) -> Option<char> {
text.lines().next()?.chars().last()
}
fn main() {
assert_eq!(
last_char_of_first_line("Hello, world\nHow are you today?"),
Some('d')
);
assert_eq!(last_char_of_first_line(""), None);
assert_eq!(last_char_of_first_line("\nhi"), None);
}
Listing 9-11: Using the ?
operator on an Option
value
This function returns Option
because it’s possible that there is a character there, but it’s also possible that there isn’t. This code takes the text
string slice argument and calls the lines
method on it, which returns an iterator over the lines in the string. Because this function wants to examine the first line, it calls next
on the iterator to get the first value from the iterator. If text
is the empty string, this call to next
will return None
, in which case we use ?
to stop and return None
from last_char_of_first_line
. If text
is not the empty string, next
will return a Some
value containing a string slice of the first line in text
.
The ?
extracts the string slice, and we can call chars
on that string slice to get an iterator of its characters. We’re interested in the last character in this first line, so we call last
to return the last item in the iterator. This is an Option
because it’s possible that the first line is the empty string, for example if text
starts with a blank line but has characters on other lines, as in "\nhi"
. However, if there is a last character on the first line, it will be returned in the Some
variant. The ?
operator in the middle gives us a concise way to express this logic, allowing us to implement the function in one line. If we couldn’t use the ?
operator on Option
, we’d have to implement this logic using more method calls or a match
expression.
Note that you can use the ?
operator on a Result
in a function that returns Result
, and you can use the ?
operator on an Option
in a function that returns Option
, but you can’t mix and match. The ?
operator won’t automatically convert a Result
to an Option
or vice versa; in those cases, you can use methods like the ok
method on Result
or the ok_or
method on Option
to do the conversion explicitly.
So far, all the main
functions we’ve used return ()
. The main
function is special because it’s the entry and exit point of executable programs, and there are restrictions on what its return type can be for the programs to behave as expected.
Luckily, main
can also return a Result<(), E>
. Listing 9-12 has the code from Listing 9-10 but we’ve changed the return type of main
to be Result<(), Box
and added a return value Ok(())
to the end. This code will now compile:
use std::error::Error;
use std::fs::File;
fn main() -> Result<(), Box<dyn Error>> {
let greeting_file = File::open("hello.txt")?;
Ok(())
}
Listing 9-12: Changing main
to return Result<(), E>
allows the use of the ?
operator on Result
values
The Box
type is a trait object, which we’ll talk about in the “Using Trait Objects that Allow for Values of Different Types” section in Chapter 17. For now, you can read Box
to mean “any kind of error.” Using ?
on a Result
value in a main
function with the error type Box
is allowed, because it allows any Err
value to be returned early. Even though the body of this main
function will only ever return errors of type std::io::Error
, by specifying Box
, this signature will continue to be correct even if more code that returns other errors is added to the body of main
.
When a main
function returns a Result<(), E>
, the executable will exit with a value of 0
if main
returns Ok(())
and will exit with a nonzero value if main
returns an Err
value. Executables written in C return integers when they exit: programs that exit successfully return the integer 0
, and programs that error return some integer other than 0
. Rust also returns integers from executables to be compatible with this convention.
The main
function may return any types that implement the std::process::Termination
trait, which contains a function report
that returns an ExitCode
Consult the standard library documentation for more information on implementing the Termination
trait for your own types.
Now that we’ve discussed the details of calling panic!
or returning Result
, let’s return to the topic of how to decide which is appropriate to use in which cases.