Condition Handlers
In parse-log-entry
you’ll signal a malformed-log-entry-error
if you can’t parse the log entry. You signal errors with the function **ERROR**
, which calls the lower-level function **SIGNAL**
and drops into the debugger if the condition isn’t handled. You can call **ERROR**
two ways: you can pass it an already instantiated condition object, or you can pass it the name of the condition class and any initargs needed to construct a new condition, and it will instantiate the condition for you. The former is occasionally useful for resignaling an existing condition object, but the latter is more concise. Thus, you could write parse-log-entry
like this, eliding the details of actually parsing a log entry:
(defun parse-log-entry (text)
(if (well-formed-log-entry-p text)
(make-instance 'log-entry ...)
(error 'malformed-log-entry-error :text text)))
What happens when the error is signaled depends on the code above parse-log-entry
on the call stack. To avoid landing in the debugger, you must establish a condition handler in one of the functions leading to the call to parse-log-entry
. When a condition is signaled, the signaling machinery looks through a list of active condition handlers, looking for a handler that can handle the condition being signaled based on the condition’s class. Each condition handler consists of a type specifier indicating what types of conditions it can handle and a function that takes a single argument, the condition. At any given moment there can be many active condition handlers established at various levels of the call stack. When a condition is signaled, the signaling machinery finds the most recently established handler whose type specifier is compatible with the condition being signaled and calls its function, passing it the condition object.
The handler function can then choose whether to handle the condition. The function can decline to handle the condition by simply returning normally, in which case control returns to the **SIGNAL**
function, which will search for the next most recently established handler with a compatible type specifier. To handle the condition, the function must transfer control out of **SIGNAL**
via a nonlocal exit. In the next section, you’ll see how a handler can choose where to transfer control. However, many condition handlers simply want to unwind the stack to the place where they were established and then run some code. The macro **HANDLER-CASE**
establishes this kind of condition handler. The basic form of a **HANDLER-CASE**
is as follows:
(handler-case expression
error-clause*)
where each error-clause is of the following form:
(condition-type ([var]) code)
If the expression returns normally, then its value is returned by the **HANDLER-CASE**
. The body of a **HANDLER-CASE**
must be a single expression; you can use **PROGN**
to combine several expressions into a single form. If, however, the expression signals a condition that’s an instance of any of the condition-types specified in any error-clause, then the code in the appropriate error clause is executed and its value returned by the **HANDLER-CASE**
. The var, if included, is the name of the variable that will hold the condition object when the handler code is executed. If the code doesn’t need to access the condition object, you can omit the variable name.
For instance, one way to handle the malformed-log-entry-error
signaled by parse-log-entry
in its caller, parse-log-file
, would be to skip the malformed entry. In the following function, the **HANDLER-CASE**
expression will either return the value returned by parse-log-entry
or return **NIL**
if a malformed-log-entry-error
is signaled. (The it
in the **LOOP**
clause collect it
is another **LOOP**
keyword, which refers to the value of the most recently evaluated conditional test, in this case the value of entry
.)
(defun parse-log-file (file)
(with-open-file (in file :direction :input)
(loop for text = (read-line in nil nil) while text
for entry = (handler-case (parse-log-entry text)
(malformed-log-entry-error () nil))
when entry collect it)))
When parse-log-entry
returns normally, its value will be assigned to entry
and collected by the **LOOP**
. But if parse-log-entry
signals a malformed-log-entry-error
, then the error clause will return **NIL**
, which won’t be collected.
JAVA-STYLE EXCEPTON HANDLING
**HANDLER-CASE**
is the nearest analog in Common Lisp to Java- or Python-style exception handling. Where you might write this in Java:
try {
doStuff();
doMoreStuff();
} catch (SomeException se) {
recover(se);
}
or this in Python:
try:
doStuff()
doMoreStuff()
except SomeException, se:
recover(se)
in Common Lisp you’d write this:
(handler-case
(progn
(do-stuff)
(do-more-stuff))
(some-exception (se) (recover se)))
This version of parse-log-file
has one serious deficiency: it’s doing too much. As its name suggests, the job of parse-log-file
is to parse the file and produce a list of log-entry
objects; if it can’t, it’s not its place to decide what to do instead. What if you want to use parse-log-file
in an application that wants to tell the user that the log file is corrupted or one that wants to recover from malformed entries by fixing them up and re-parsing them? Or maybe an application is fine with skipping them but only until a certain number of corrupted entries have been seen.
You could try to fix this problem by moving the **HANDLER-CASE**
to a higher-level function. However, then you’d have no way to implement the current policy of skipping individual entries—when the error was signaled, the stack would be unwound all the way to the higher-level function, abandoning the parsing of the log file altogether. What you want is a way to provide the current recovery strategy without requiring that it always be used.