Jobs
Jobs represent one-off tasks that run to completion and then stop.
A Job creates one or more Pods and will continue to retry execution of the Pods until a specified number of them successfully terminate. As pods successfully complete, the Job tracks the successful completions. When a specified number of successful completions is reached, the task (ie, Job) is complete. Deleting a Job will clean up the Pods it created. Suspending a Job will delete its active Pods until the Job is resumed again.
A simple case is to create one Job object in order to reliably run one Pod to completion. The Job object will start a new Pod if the first Pod fails or is deleted (for example due to a node hardware failure or a node reboot).
You can also use a Job to run multiple Pods in parallel.
If you want to run a Job (either a single task, or several in parallel) on a schedule, see CronJob.
Running an example Job
Here is an example Job config. It computes π to 2000 places and prints it out. It takes around 10s to complete.
apiVersion: batch/v1
kind: Job
metadata:
name: pi
spec:
template:
spec:
containers:
- name: pi
image: perl:5.34.0
command: ["perl", "-Mbignum=bpi", "-wle", "print bpi(2000)"]
restartPolicy: Never
backoffLimit: 4
You can run the example with this command:
kubectl apply -f https://kubernetes.io/examples/controllers/job.yaml
The output is similar to this:
job.batch/pi created
Check on the status of the Job with kubectl
:
Name: pi
Namespace: default
Selector: batch.kubernetes.io/controller-uid=c9948307-e56d-4b5d-8302-ae2d7b7da67c
Labels: batch.kubernetes.io/controller-uid=c9948307-e56d-4b5d-8302-ae2d7b7da67c
batch.kubernetes.io/job-name=pi
...
Annotations: batch.kubernetes.io/job-tracking: ""
Parallelism: 1
Completions: 1
Start Time: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 15:20:11 +0200
Completed At: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 15:21:16 +0200
Duration: 65s
Pods Statuses: 0 Running / 1 Succeeded / 0 Failed
Pod Template:
Labels: batch.kubernetes.io/controller-uid=c9948307-e56d-4b5d-8302-ae2d7b7da67c
batch.kubernetes.io/job-name=pi
Containers:
pi:
Image: perl:5.34.0
Port: <none>
Host Port: <none>
Command:
perl
-Mbignum=bpi
-wle
print bpi(2000)
Environment: <none>
Mounts: <none>
Volumes: <none>
Events:
Type Reason Age From Message
---- ------ ---- ---- -------
Normal SuccessfulCreate 21s job-controller Created pod: pi-xf9p4
Normal Completed 18s job-controller Job completed
apiVersion: batch/v1
kind: Job
metadata:
annotations: batch.kubernetes.io/job-tracking: ""
...
creationTimestamp: "2022-11-10T17:53:53Z"
generation: 1
labels:
batch.kubernetes.io/controller-uid: 863452e6-270d-420e-9b94-53a54146c223
batch.kubernetes.io/job-name: pi
name: pi
namespace: default
resourceVersion: "4751"
uid: 204fb678-040b-497f-9266-35ffa8716d14
spec:
backoffLimit: 4
completionMode: NonIndexed
completions: 1
parallelism: 1
selector:
matchLabels:
batch.kubernetes.io/controller-uid: 863452e6-270d-420e-9b94-53a54146c223
suspend: false
template:
metadata:
creationTimestamp: null
labels:
batch.kubernetes.io/controller-uid: 863452e6-270d-420e-9b94-53a54146c223
batch.kubernetes.io/job-name: pi
spec:
containers:
- command:
- perl
- -Mbignum=bpi
- -wle
- print bpi(2000)
image: perl:5.34.0
imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent
name: pi
resources: {}
terminationMessagePath: /dev/termination-log
terminationMessagePolicy: File
dnsPolicy: ClusterFirst
restartPolicy: Never
schedulerName: default-scheduler
securityContext: {}
terminationGracePeriodSeconds: 30
status:
active: 1
ready: 0
startTime: "2022-11-10T17:53:57Z"
uncountedTerminatedPods: {}
To view completed Pods of a Job, use kubectl get pods
.
To list all the Pods that belong to a Job in a machine readable form, you can use a command like this:
pods=$(kubectl get pods --selector=batch.kubernetes.io/job-name=pi --output=jsonpath='{.items[*].metadata.name}')
echo $pods
The output is similar to this:
pi-5rwd7
Here, the selector is the same as the selector for the Job. The --output=jsonpath
option specifies an expression with the name from each Pod in the returned list.
View the standard output of one of the pods:
kubectl logs $pods
Another way to view the logs of a Job:
kubectl logs jobs/pi
The output is similar to this:
3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679821480865132823066470938446095505822317253594081284811174502841027019385211055596446229489549303819644288109756659334461284756482337867831652712019091456485669234603486104543266482133936072602491412737245870066063155881748815209209628292540917153643678925903600113305305488204665213841469519415116094330572703657595919530921861173819326117931051185480744623799627495673518857527248912279381830119491298336733624406566430860213949463952247371907021798609437027705392171762931767523846748184676694051320005681271452635608277857713427577896091736371787214684409012249534301465495853710507922796892589235420199561121290219608640344181598136297747713099605187072113499999983729780499510597317328160963185950244594553469083026425223082533446850352619311881710100031378387528865875332083814206171776691473035982534904287554687311595628638823537875937519577818577805321712268066130019278766111959092164201989380952572010654858632788659361533818279682303019520353018529689957736225994138912497217752834791315155748572424541506959508295331168617278558890750983817546374649393192550604009277016711390098488240128583616035637076601047101819429555961989467678374494482553797747268471040475346462080466842590694912933136770289891521047521620569660240580381501935112533824300355876402474964732639141992726042699227967823547816360093417216412199245863150302861829745557067498385054945885869269956909272107975093029553211653449872027559602364806654991198818347977535663698074265425278625518184175746728909777727938000816470600161452491921732172147723501414419735685481613611573525521334757418494684385233239073941433345477624168625189835694855620992192221842725502542568876717904946016534668049886272327917860857843838279679766814541009538837863609506800642251252051173929848960841284886269456042419652850222106611863067442786220391949450471237137869609563643719172874677646575739624138908658326459958133904780275901
Writing a Job spec
As with all other Kubernetes config, a Job needs apiVersion
, kind
, and metadata
fields.
When the control plane creates new Pods for a Job, the .metadata.name
of the Job is part of the basis for naming those Pods. The name of a Job must be a valid DNS subdomain value, but this can produce unexpected results for the Pod hostnames. For best compatibility, the name should follow the more restrictive rules for a DNS label. Even when the name is a DNS subdomain, the name must be no longer than 63 characters.
A Job also needs a .spec section.
Job Labels
Job labels will have batch.kubernetes.io/
prefix for job-name
and controller-uid
.
Pod Template
The .spec.template
is the only required field of the .spec
.
The .spec.template
is a pod template. It has exactly the same schema as a Pod, except it is nested and does not have an apiVersion
or kind
.
In addition to required fields for a Pod, a pod template in a Job must specify appropriate labels (see pod selector) and an appropriate restart policy.
Only a RestartPolicy equal to Never
or OnFailure
is allowed.
Pod selector
The .spec.selector
field is optional. In almost all cases you should not specify it. See section specifying your own pod selector.
Parallel execution for Jobs
There are three main types of task suitable to run as a Job:
- Non-parallel Jobs
- normally, only one Pod is started, unless the Pod fails.
- the Job is complete as soon as its Pod terminates successfully.
- Parallel Jobs with a fixed completion count:
- specify a non-zero positive value for
.spec.completions
. - the Job represents the overall task, and is complete when there are
.spec.completions
successful Pods. - when using
.spec.completionMode="Indexed"
, each Pod gets a different index in the range 0 to.spec.completions-1
.
- specify a non-zero positive value for
- Parallel Jobs with a work queue:
- do not specify
.spec.completions
, default to.spec.parallelism
. - the Pods must coordinate amongst themselves or an external service to determine what each should work on. For example, a Pod might fetch a batch of up to N items from the work queue.
- each Pod is independently capable of determining whether or not all its peers are done, and thus that the entire Job is done.
- when any Pod from the Job terminates with success, no new Pods are created.
- once at least one Pod has terminated with success and all Pods are terminated, then the Job is completed with success.
- once any Pod has exited with success, no other Pod should still be doing any work for this task or writing any output. They should all be in the process of exiting.
- do not specify
For a non-parallel Job, you can leave both .spec.completions
and .spec.parallelism
unset. When both are unset, both are defaulted to 1.
For a fixed completion count Job, you should set .spec.completions
to the number of completions needed. You can set .spec.parallelism
, or leave it unset and it will default to 1.
For a work queue Job, you must leave .spec.completions
unset, and set .spec.parallelism
to a non-negative integer.
For more information about how to make use of the different types of job, see the job patterns section.
Controlling parallelism
The requested parallelism (.spec.parallelism
) can be set to any non-negative value. If it is unspecified, it defaults to 1. If it is specified as 0, then the Job is effectively paused until it is increased.
Actual parallelism (number of pods running at any instant) may be more or less than requested parallelism, for a variety of reasons:
- For fixed completion count Jobs, the actual number of pods running in parallel will not exceed the number of remaining completions. Higher values of
.spec.parallelism
are effectively ignored. - For work queue Jobs, no new Pods are started after any Pod has succeeded — remaining Pods are allowed to complete, however.
- If the Job Controller has not had time to react.
- If the Job controller failed to create Pods for any reason (lack of
ResourceQuota
, lack of permission, etc.), then there may be fewer pods than requested. - The Job controller may throttle new Pod creation due to excessive previous pod failures in the same Job.
- When a Pod is gracefully shut down, it takes time to stop.
Completion mode
FEATURE STATE: Kubernetes v1.24 [stable]
Jobs with fixed completion count - that is, jobs that have non null .spec.completions
- can have a completion mode that is specified in .spec.completionMode
:
NonIndexed
(default): the Job is considered complete when there have been.spec.completions
successfully completed Pods. In other words, each Pod completion is homologous to each other. Note that Jobs that have null.spec.completions
are implicitlyNonIndexed
.Indexed
: the Pods of a Job get an associated completion index from 0 to.spec.completions-1
. The index is available through four mechanisms:- The Pod annotation
batch.kubernetes.io/job-completion-index
. - The Pod label
batch.kubernetes.io/job-completion-index
(for v1.28 and later). Note the feature gatePodIndexLabel
must be enabled to use this label, and it is enabled by default. - As part of the Pod hostname, following the pattern
$(job-name)-$(index)
. When you use an Indexed Job in combination with a Service, Pods within the Job can use the deterministic hostnames to address each other via DNS. For more information about how to configure this, see Job with Pod-to-Pod Communication. - From the containerized task, in the environment variable
JOB_COMPLETION_INDEX
.
The Job is considered complete when there is one successfully completed Pod for each index. For more information about how to use this mode, see Indexed Job for Parallel Processing with Static Work Assignment.
- The Pod annotation
Note: Although rare, more than one Pod could be started for the same index (due to various reasons such as node failures, kubelet restarts, or Pod evictions). In this case, only the first Pod that completes successfully will count towards the completion count and update the status of the Job. The other Pods that are running or completed for the same index will be deleted by the Job controller once they are detected.
Handling Pod and container failures
A container in a Pod may fail for a number of reasons, such as because the process in it exited with a non-zero exit code, or the container was killed for exceeding a memory limit, etc. If this happens, and the .spec.template.spec.restartPolicy = "OnFailure"
, then the Pod stays on the node, but the container is re-run. Therefore, your program needs to handle the case when it is restarted locally, or else specify .spec.template.spec.restartPolicy = "Never"
. See pod lifecycle for more information on restartPolicy
.
An entire Pod can also fail, for a number of reasons, such as when the pod is kicked off the node (node is upgraded, rebooted, deleted, etc.), or if a container of the Pod fails and the .spec.template.spec.restartPolicy = "Never"
. When a Pod fails, then the Job controller starts a new Pod. This means that your application needs to handle the case when it is restarted in a new pod. In particular, it needs to handle temporary files, locks, incomplete output and the like caused by previous runs.
By default, each pod failure is counted towards the .spec.backoffLimit
limit, see pod backoff failure policy. However, you can customize handling of pod failures by setting the Job’s pod failure policy.
Additionally, you can choose to count the pod failures independently for each index of an Indexed Job by setting the .spec.backoffLimitPerIndex
field (for more information, see backoff limit per index).
Note that even if you specify .spec.parallelism = 1
and .spec.completions = 1
and .spec.template.spec.restartPolicy = "Never"
, the same program may sometimes be started twice.
If you do specify .spec.parallelism
and .spec.completions
both greater than 1, then there may be multiple pods running at once. Therefore, your pods must also be tolerant of concurrency.
When the feature gates PodDisruptionConditions
and JobPodFailurePolicy
are both enabled, and the .spec.podFailurePolicy
field is set, the Job controller does not consider a terminating Pod (a pod that has a .metadata.deletionTimestamp
field set) as a failure until that Pod is terminal (its .status.phase
is Failed
or Succeeded
). However, the Job controller creates a replacement Pod as soon as the termination becomes apparent. Once the pod terminates, the Job controller evaluates .backoffLimit
and .podFailurePolicy
for the relevant Job, taking this now-terminated Pod into consideration.
If either of these requirements is not satisfied, the Job controller counts a terminating Pod as an immediate failure, even if that Pod later terminates with phase: "Succeeded"
.
Pod backoff failure policy
There are situations where you want to fail a Job after some amount of retries due to a logical error in configuration etc. To do so, set .spec.backoffLimit
to specify the number of retries before considering a Job as failed. The back-off limit is set by default to 6. Failed Pods associated with the Job are recreated by the Job controller with an exponential back-off delay (10s, 20s, 40s …) capped at six minutes.
The number of retries is calculated in two ways:
- The number of Pods with
.status.phase = "Failed"
. - When using
restartPolicy = "OnFailure"
, the number of retries in all the containers of Pods with.status.phase
equal toPending
orRunning
.
If either of the calculations reaches the .spec.backoffLimit
, the Job is considered failed.
Note: If your job has restartPolicy = "OnFailure"
, keep in mind that your Pod running the Job will be terminated once the job backoff limit has been reached. This can make debugging the Job’s executable more difficult. We suggest setting restartPolicy = "Never"
when debugging the Job or using a logging system to ensure output from failed Jobs is not lost inadvertently.
Backoff limit per index
FEATURE STATE: Kubernetes v1.29 [beta]
Note: You can only configure the backoff limit per index for an Indexed Job, if you have the JobBackoffLimitPerIndex
feature gate enabled in your cluster.
When you run an indexed Job, you can choose to handle retries for pod failures independently for each index. To do so, set the .spec.backoffLimitPerIndex
to specify the maximal number of pod failures per index.
When the per-index backoff limit is exceeded for an index, Kubernetes considers the index as failed and adds it to the .status.failedIndexes
field. The succeeded indexes, those with a successfully executed pods, are recorded in the .status.completedIndexes
field, regardless of whether you set the backoffLimitPerIndex
field.
Note that a failing index does not interrupt execution of other indexes. Once all indexes finish for a Job where you specified a backoff limit per index, if at least one of those indexes did fail, the Job controller marks the overall Job as failed, by setting the Failed condition in the status. The Job gets marked as failed even if some, potentially nearly all, of the indexes were processed successfully.
You can additionally limit the maximal number of indexes marked failed by setting the .spec.maxFailedIndexes
field. When the number of failed indexes exceeds the maxFailedIndexes
field, the Job controller triggers termination of all remaining running Pods for that Job. Once all pods are terminated, the entire Job is marked failed by the Job controller, by setting the Failed condition in the Job status.
Here is an example manifest for a Job that defines a backoffLimitPerIndex
:
/controllers/job-backoff-limit-per-index-example.yaml
apiVersion: batch/v1
kind: Job
metadata:
name: job-backoff-limit-per-index-example
spec:
completions: 10
parallelism: 3
completionMode: Indexed # required for the feature
backoffLimitPerIndex: 1 # maximal number of failures per index
maxFailedIndexes: 5 # maximal number of failed indexes before terminating the Job execution
template:
spec:
restartPolicy: Never # required for the feature
containers:
- name: example
image: python
command: # The jobs fails as there is at least one failed index
# (all even indexes fail in here), yet all indexes
# are executed as maxFailedIndexes is not exceeded.
- python3
- -c
- |
import os, sys
print("Hello world")
if int(os.environ.get("JOB_COMPLETION_INDEX")) % 2 == 0:
sys.exit(1)
In the example above, the Job controller allows for one restart for each of the indexes. When the total number of failed indexes exceeds 5, then the entire Job is terminated.
Once the job is finished, the Job status looks as follows:
kubectl get -o yaml job job-backoff-limit-per-index-example
status:
completedIndexes: 1,3,5,7,9
failedIndexes: 0,2,4,6,8
succeeded: 5 # 1 succeeded pod for each of 5 succeeded indexes
failed: 10 # 2 failed pods (1 retry) for each of 5 failed indexes
conditions:
- message: Job has failed indexes
reason: FailedIndexes
status: "True"
type: Failed
Additionally, you may want to use the per-index backoff along with a pod failure policy. When using per-index backoff, there is a new FailIndex
action available which allows you to avoid unnecessary retries within an index.
Pod failure policy
FEATURE STATE: Kubernetes v1.26 [beta]
Note: You can only configure a Pod failure policy for a Job if you have the JobPodFailurePolicy
feature gate enabled in your cluster. Additionally, it is recommended to enable the PodDisruptionConditions
feature gate in order to be able to detect and handle Pod disruption conditions in the Pod failure policy (see also: Pod disruption conditions). Both feature gates are available in Kubernetes 1.30.
A Pod failure policy, defined with the .spec.podFailurePolicy
field, enables your cluster to handle Pod failures based on the container exit codes and the Pod conditions.
In some situations, you may want to have a better control when handling Pod failures than the control provided by the Pod backoff failure policy, which is based on the Job’s .spec.backoffLimit
. These are some examples of use cases:
- To optimize costs of running workloads by avoiding unnecessary Pod restarts, you can terminate a Job as soon as one of its Pods fails with an exit code indicating a software bug.
- To guarantee that your Job finishes even if there are disruptions, you can ignore Pod failures caused by disruptions (such as preemption, API-initiated eviction or taint-based eviction) so that they don’t count towards the
.spec.backoffLimit
limit of retries.
You can configure a Pod failure policy, in the .spec.podFailurePolicy
field, to meet the above use cases. This policy can handle Pod failures based on the container exit codes and the Pod conditions.
Here is a manifest for a Job that defines a podFailurePolicy
:
/controllers/job-pod-failure-policy-example.yaml
apiVersion: batch/v1
kind: Job
metadata:
name: job-pod-failure-policy-example
spec:
completions: 12
parallelism: 3
template:
spec:
restartPolicy: Never
containers:
- name: main
image: docker.io/library/bash:5
command: ["bash"] # example command simulating a bug which triggers the FailJob action
args:
- -c
- echo "Hello world!" && sleep 5 && exit 42
backoffLimit: 6
podFailurePolicy:
rules:
- action: FailJob
onExitCodes:
containerName: main # optional
operator: In # one of: In, NotIn
values: [42]
- action: Ignore # one of: Ignore, FailJob, Count
onPodConditions:
- type: DisruptionTarget # indicates Pod disruption
In the example above, the first rule of the Pod failure policy specifies that the Job should be marked failed if the main
container fails with the 42 exit code. The following are the rules for the main
container specifically:
- an exit code of 0 means that the container succeeded
- an exit code of 42 means that the entire Job failed
- any other exit code represents that the container failed, and hence the entire Pod. The Pod will be re-created if the total number of restarts is below
backoffLimit
. If thebackoffLimit
is reached the entire Job failed.
Note: Because the Pod template specifies a restartPolicy: Never
, the kubelet does not restart the main
container in that particular Pod.
The second rule of the Pod failure policy, specifying the Ignore
action for failed Pods with condition DisruptionTarget
excludes Pod disruptions from being counted towards the .spec.backoffLimit
limit of retries.
Note: If the Job failed, either by the Pod failure policy or Pod backoff failure policy, and the Job is running multiple Pods, Kubernetes terminates all the Pods in that Job that are still Pending or Running.
These are some requirements and semantics of the API:
- if you want to use a
.spec.podFailurePolicy
field for a Job, you must also define that Job’s pod template with.spec.restartPolicy
set toNever
. - the Pod failure policy rules you specify under
spec.podFailurePolicy.rules
are evaluated in order. Once a rule matches a Pod failure, the remaining rules are ignored. When no rule matches the Pod failure, the default handling applies. - you may want to restrict a rule to a specific container by specifying its name in
spec.podFailurePolicy.rules[*].onExitCodes.containerName
. When not specified the rule applies to all containers. When specified, it should match one the container orinitContainer
names in the Pod template. - you may specify the action taken when a Pod failure policy is matched by
spec.podFailurePolicy.rules[*].action
. Possible values are:FailJob
: use to indicate that the Pod’s job should be marked as Failed and all running Pods should be terminated.Ignore
: use to indicate that the counter towards the.spec.backoffLimit
should not be incremented and a replacement Pod should be created.Count
: use to indicate that the Pod should be handled in the default way. The counter towards the.spec.backoffLimit
should be incremented.FailIndex
: use this action along with backoff limit per index to avoid unnecessary retries within the index of a failed pod.
Note: When you use a podFailurePolicy
, the job controller only matches Pods in the Failed
phase. Pods with a deletion timestamp that are not in a terminal phase (Failed
or Succeeded
) are considered still terminating. This implies that terminating pods retain a tracking finalizer until they reach a terminal phase. Since Kubernetes 1.27, Kubelet transitions deleted pods to a terminal phase (see: Pod Phase). This ensures that deleted pods have their finalizers removed by the Job controller.
Note: Starting with Kubernetes v1.28, when Pod failure policy is used, the Job controller recreates terminating Pods only once these Pods reach the terminal Failed
phase. This behavior is similar to podReplacementPolicy: Failed
. For more information, see Pod replacement policy.
Success policy
FEATURE STATE: Kubernetes v1.30 [alpha]
Note: You can only configure a success policy for an Indexed Job if you have the JobSuccessPolicy
feature gate enabled in your cluster.
When creating an Indexed Job, you can define when a Job can be declared as succeeded using a .spec.successPolicy
, based on the pods that succeeded.
By default, a Job succeeds when the number of succeeded Pods equals .spec.completions
. These are some situations where you might want additional control for declaring a Job succeeded:
- When running simulations with different parameters, you might not need all the simulations to succeed for the overall Job to be successful.
- When following a leader-worker pattern, only the success of the leader determines the success or failure of a Job. Examples of this are frameworks like MPI and PyTorch etc.
You can configure a success policy, in the .spec.successPolicy
field, to meet the above use cases. This policy can handle Job success based on the succeeded pods. After the Job meets the success policy, the job controller terminates the lingering Pods. A success policy is defined by rules. Each rule can take one of the following forms:
- When you specify the
succeededIndexes
only, once all indexes specified in thesucceededIndexes
succeed, the job controller marks the Job as succeeded. ThesucceededIndexes
must be a list of intervals between 0 and.spec.completions-1
. - When you specify the
succeededCount
only, once the number of succeeded indexes reaches thesucceededCount
, the job controller marks the Job as succeeded. - When you specify both
succeededIndexes
andsucceededCount
, once the number of succeeded indexes from the subset of indexes specified in thesucceededIndexes
reaches thesucceededCount
, the job controller marks the Job as succeeded.
Note that when you specify multiple rules in the .spec.succeessPolicy.rules
, the job controller evaluates the rules in order. Once the Job meets a rule, the job controller ignores remaining rules.
Here is a manifest for a Job with successPolicy
:
/controllers/job-success-policy.yaml
apiVersion: batch/v1
kind: Job
spec:
parallelism: 10
completions: 10
completionMode: Indexed # Required for the success policy
successPolicy:
rules:
- succeededIndexes: 0,2-3
succeededCount: 1
template:
spec:
containers:
- name: main
image: python
command: # Provided that at least one of the Pods with 0, 2, and 3 indexes has succeeded,
# the overall Job is a success.
- python3
- -c
- |
import os, sys
if os.environ.get("JOB_COMPLETION_INDEX") == "2":
sys.exit(0)
else:
sys.exit(1)
In the example above, both succeededIndexes
and succeededCount
have been specified. Therefore, the job controller will mark the Job as succeeded and terminate the lingering Pods when either of the specified indexes, 0, 2, or 3, succeed. The Job that meets the success policy gets the SuccessCriteriaMet
condition. After the removal of the lingering Pods is issued, the Job gets the Complete
condition.
Note that the succeededIndexes
is represented as intervals separated by a hyphen. The number are listed in represented by the first and last element of the series, separated by a hyphen.
Note: When you specify both a success policy and some terminating policies such as .spec.backoffLimit
and .spec.podFailurePolicy
, once the Job meets either policy, the job controller respects the terminating policy and ignores the success policy.
Job termination and cleanup
When a Job completes, no more Pods are created, but the Pods are usually not deleted either. Keeping them around allows you to still view the logs of completed pods to check for errors, warnings, or other diagnostic output. The job object also remains after it is completed so that you can view its status. It is up to the user to delete old jobs after noting their status. Delete the job with kubectl
(e.g. kubectl delete jobs/pi
or kubectl delete -f ./job.yaml
). When you delete the job using kubectl
, all the pods it created are deleted too.
By default, a Job will run uninterrupted unless a Pod fails (restartPolicy=Never
) or a Container exits in error (restartPolicy=OnFailure
), at which point the Job defers to the .spec.backoffLimit
described above. Once .spec.backoffLimit
has been reached the Job will be marked as failed and any running Pods will be terminated.
Another way to terminate a Job is by setting an active deadline. Do this by setting the .spec.activeDeadlineSeconds
field of the Job to a number of seconds. The activeDeadlineSeconds
applies to the duration of the job, no matter how many Pods are created. Once a Job reaches activeDeadlineSeconds
, all of its running Pods are terminated and the Job status will become type: Failed
with reason: DeadlineExceeded
.
Note that a Job’s .spec.activeDeadlineSeconds
takes precedence over its .spec.backoffLimit
. Therefore, a Job that is retrying one or more failed Pods will not deploy additional Pods once it reaches the time limit specified by activeDeadlineSeconds
, even if the backoffLimit
is not yet reached.
Example:
apiVersion: batch/v1
kind: Job
metadata:
name: pi-with-timeout
spec:
backoffLimit: 5
activeDeadlineSeconds: 100
template:
spec:
containers:
- name: pi
image: perl:5.34.0
command: ["perl", "-Mbignum=bpi", "-wle", "print bpi(2000)"]
restartPolicy: Never
Note that both the Job spec and the Pod template spec within the Job have an activeDeadlineSeconds
field. Ensure that you set this field at the proper level.
Keep in mind that the restartPolicy
applies to the Pod, and not to the Job itself: there is no automatic Job restart once the Job status is type: Failed
. That is, the Job termination mechanisms activated with .spec.activeDeadlineSeconds
and .spec.backoffLimit
result in a permanent Job failure that requires manual intervention to resolve.
Clean up finished jobs automatically
Finished Jobs are usually no longer needed in the system. Keeping them around in the system will put pressure on the API server. If the Jobs are managed directly by a higher level controller, such as CronJobs, the Jobs can be cleaned up by CronJobs based on the specified capacity-based cleanup policy.
TTL mechanism for finished Jobs
FEATURE STATE: Kubernetes v1.23 [stable]
Another way to clean up finished Jobs (either Complete
or Failed
) automatically is to use a TTL mechanism provided by a TTL controller for finished resources, by specifying the .spec.ttlSecondsAfterFinished
field of the Job.
When the TTL controller cleans up the Job, it will delete the Job cascadingly, i.e. delete its dependent objects, such as Pods, together with the Job. Note that when the Job is deleted, its lifecycle guarantees, such as finalizers, will be honored.
For example:
apiVersion: batch/v1
kind: Job
metadata:
name: pi-with-ttl
spec:
ttlSecondsAfterFinished: 100
template:
spec:
containers:
- name: pi
image: perl:5.34.0
command: ["perl", "-Mbignum=bpi", "-wle", "print bpi(2000)"]
restartPolicy: Never
The Job pi-with-ttl
will be eligible to be automatically deleted, 100
seconds after it finishes.
If the field is set to 0
, the Job will be eligible to be automatically deleted immediately after it finishes. If the field is unset, this Job won’t be cleaned up by the TTL controller after it finishes.
Note:
It is recommended to set ttlSecondsAfterFinished
field because unmanaged jobs (Jobs that you created directly, and not indirectly through other workload APIs such as CronJob) have a default deletion policy of orphanDependents
causing Pods created by an unmanaged Job to be left around after that Job is fully deleted. Even though the control plane eventually garbage collects the Pods from a deleted Job after they either fail or complete, sometimes those lingering pods may cause cluster performance degradation or in worst case cause the cluster to go offline due to this degradation.
You can use LimitRanges and ResourceQuotas to place a cap on the amount of resources that a particular namespace can consume.
Job patterns
The Job object can be used to process a set of independent but related work items. These might be emails to be sent, frames to be rendered, files to be transcoded, ranges of keys in a NoSQL database to scan, and so on.
In a complex system, there may be multiple different sets of work items. Here we are just considering one set of work items that the user wants to manage together — a batch job.
There are several different patterns for parallel computation, each with strengths and weaknesses. The tradeoffs are:
- One Job object for each work item, versus a single Job object for all work items. One Job per work item creates some overhead for the user and for the system to manage large numbers of Job objects. A single Job for all work items is better for large numbers of items.
- Number of Pods created equals number of work items, versus each Pod can process multiple work items. When the number of Pods equals the number of work items, the Pods typically requires less modification to existing code and containers. Having each Pod process multiple work items is better for large numbers of items.
- Several approaches use a work queue. This requires running a queue service, and modifications to the existing program or container to make it use the work queue. Other approaches are easier to adapt to an existing containerised application.
- When the Job is associated with a headless Service, you can enable the Pods within a Job to communicate with each other to collaborate in a computation.
The tradeoffs are summarized here, with columns 2 to 4 corresponding to the above tradeoffs. The pattern names are also links to examples and more detailed description.
Pattern | Single Job object | Fewer pods than work items? | Use app unmodified? |
---|---|---|---|
Queue with Pod Per Work Item | ✓ | sometimes | |
Queue with Variable Pod Count | ✓ | ✓ | |
Indexed Job with Static Work Assignment | ✓ | ✓ | |
Job with Pod-to-Pod Communication | ✓ | sometimes | sometimes |
Job Template Expansion | ✓ |
When you specify completions with .spec.completions
, each Pod created by the Job controller has an identical spec. This means that all pods for a task will have the same command line and the same image, the same volumes, and (almost) the same environment variables. These patterns are different ways to arrange for pods to work on different things.
This table shows the required settings for .spec.parallelism
and .spec.completions
for each of the patterns. Here, W
is the number of work items.
Pattern | .spec.completions | .spec.parallelism |
---|---|---|
Queue with Pod Per Work Item | W | any |
Queue with Variable Pod Count | null | any |
Indexed Job with Static Work Assignment | W | any |
Job with Pod-to-Pod Communication | W | W |
Job Template Expansion | 1 | should be 1 |
Advanced usage
Suspending a Job
FEATURE STATE: Kubernetes v1.24 [stable]
When a Job is created, the Job controller will immediately begin creating Pods to satisfy the Job’s requirements and will continue to do so until the Job is complete. However, you may want to temporarily suspend a Job’s execution and resume it later, or start Jobs in suspended state and have a custom controller decide later when to start them.
To suspend a Job, you can update the .spec.suspend
field of the Job to true; later, when you want to resume it again, update it to false. Creating a Job with .spec.suspend
set to true will create it in the suspended state.
When a Job is resumed from suspension, its .status.startTime
field will be reset to the current time. This means that the .spec.activeDeadlineSeconds
timer will be stopped and reset when a Job is suspended and resumed.
When you suspend a Job, any running Pods that don’t have a status of Completed
will be terminated with a SIGTERM signal. The Pod’s graceful termination period will be honored and your Pod must handle this signal in this period. This may involve saving progress for later or undoing changes. Pods terminated this way will not count towards the Job’s completions
count.
An example Job definition in the suspended state can be like so:
kubectl get job myjob -o yaml
apiVersion: batch/v1
kind: Job
metadata:
name: myjob
spec:
suspend: true
parallelism: 1
completions: 5
template:
spec:
...
You can also toggle Job suspension by patching the Job using the command line.
Suspend an active Job:
kubectl patch job/myjob --type=strategic --patch '{"spec":{"suspend":true}}'
Resume a suspended Job:
kubectl patch job/myjob --type=strategic --patch '{"spec":{"suspend":false}}'
The Job’s status can be used to determine if a Job is suspended or has been suspended in the past:
kubectl get jobs/myjob -o yaml
apiVersion: batch/v1
kind: Job
# .metadata and .spec omitted
status:
conditions:
- lastProbeTime: "2021-02-05T13:14:33Z"
lastTransitionTime: "2021-02-05T13:14:33Z"
status: "True"
type: Suspended
startTime: "2021-02-05T13:13:48Z"
The Job condition of type “Suspended” with status “True” means the Job is suspended; the lastTransitionTime
field can be used to determine how long the Job has been suspended for. If the status of that condition is “False”, then the Job was previously suspended and is now running. If such a condition does not exist in the Job’s status, the Job has never been stopped.
Events are also created when the Job is suspended and resumed:
kubectl describe jobs/myjob
Name: myjob
...
Events:
Type Reason Age From Message
---- ------ ---- ---- -------
Normal SuccessfulCreate 12m job-controller Created pod: myjob-hlrpl
Normal SuccessfulDelete 11m job-controller Deleted pod: myjob-hlrpl
Normal Suspended 11m job-controller Job suspended
Normal SuccessfulCreate 3s job-controller Created pod: myjob-jvb44
Normal Resumed 3s job-controller Job resumed
The last four events, particularly the “Suspended” and “Resumed” events, are directly a result of toggling the .spec.suspend
field. In the time between these two events, we see that no Pods were created, but Pod creation restarted as soon as the Job was resumed.
Mutable Scheduling Directives
FEATURE STATE: Kubernetes v1.27 [stable]
In most cases, a parallel job will want the pods to run with constraints, like all in the same zone, or all either on GPU model x or y but not a mix of both.
The suspend field is the first step towards achieving those semantics. Suspend allows a custom queue controller to decide when a job should start; However, once a job is unsuspended, a custom queue controller has no influence on where the pods of a job will actually land.
This feature allows updating a Job’s scheduling directives before it starts, which gives custom queue controllers the ability to influence pod placement while at the same time offloading actual pod-to-node assignment to kube-scheduler. This is allowed only for suspended Jobs that have never been unsuspended before.
The fields in a Job’s pod template that can be updated are node affinity, node selector, tolerations, labels, annotations and scheduling gates.
Specifying your own Pod selector
Normally, when you create a Job object, you do not specify .spec.selector
. The system defaulting logic adds this field when the Job is created. It picks a selector value that will not overlap with any other jobs.
However, in some cases, you might need to override this automatically set selector. To do this, you can specify the .spec.selector
of the Job.
Be very careful when doing this. If you specify a label selector which is not unique to the pods of that Job, and which matches unrelated Pods, then pods of the unrelated job may be deleted, or this Job may count other Pods as completing it, or one or both Jobs may refuse to create Pods or run to completion. If a non-unique selector is chosen, then other controllers (e.g. ReplicationController) and their Pods may behave in unpredictable ways too. Kubernetes will not stop you from making a mistake when specifying .spec.selector
.
Here is an example of a case when you might want to use this feature.
Say Job old
is already running. You want existing Pods to keep running, but you want the rest of the Pods it creates to use a different pod template and for the Job to have a new name. You cannot update the Job because these fields are not updatable. Therefore, you delete Job old
but leave its pods running, using kubectl delete jobs/old --cascade=orphan
. Before deleting it, you make a note of what selector it uses:
kubectl get job old -o yaml
The output is similar to this:
kind: Job
metadata:
name: old
...
spec:
selector:
matchLabels:
batch.kubernetes.io/controller-uid: a8f3d00d-c6d2-11e5-9f87-42010af00002
...
Then you create a new Job with name new
and you explicitly specify the same selector. Since the existing Pods have label batch.kubernetes.io/controller-uid=a8f3d00d-c6d2-11e5-9f87-42010af00002
, they are controlled by Job new
as well.
You need to specify manualSelector: true
in the new Job since you are not using the selector that the system normally generates for you automatically.
kind: Job
metadata:
name: new
...
spec:
manualSelector: true
selector:
matchLabels:
batch.kubernetes.io/controller-uid: a8f3d00d-c6d2-11e5-9f87-42010af00002
...
The new Job itself will have a different uid from a8f3d00d-c6d2-11e5-9f87-42010af00002
. Setting manualSelector: true
tells the system that you know what you are doing and to allow this mismatch.
Job tracking with finalizers
FEATURE STATE: Kubernetes v1.26 [stable]
The control plane keeps track of the Pods that belong to any Job and notices if any such Pod is removed from the API server. To do that, the Job controller creates Pods with the finalizer batch.kubernetes.io/job-tracking
. The controller removes the finalizer only after the Pod has been accounted for in the Job status, allowing the Pod to be removed by other controllers or users.
Note: See My pod stays terminating if you observe that pods from a Job are stuck with the tracking finalizer.
Elastic Indexed Jobs
FEATURE STATE: Kubernetes v1.27 [beta]
You can scale Indexed Jobs up or down by mutating both .spec.parallelism
and .spec.completions
together such that .spec.parallelism == .spec.completions
. When the ElasticIndexedJob
feature gate on the API server is disabled, .spec.completions
is immutable.
Use cases for elastic Indexed Jobs include batch workloads which require scaling an indexed Job, such as MPI, Horovord, Ray, and PyTorch training jobs.
Delayed creation of replacement pods
FEATURE STATE: Kubernetes v1.29 [beta]
Note: You can only set podReplacementPolicy
on Jobs if you enable the JobPodReplacementPolicy
feature gate (enabled by default).
By default, the Job controller recreates Pods as soon they either fail or are terminating (have a deletion timestamp). This means that, at a given time, when some of the Pods are terminating, the number of running Pods for a Job can be greater than parallelism
or greater than one Pod per index (if you are using an Indexed Job).
You may choose to create replacement Pods only when the terminating Pod is fully terminal (has status.phase: Failed
). To do this, set the .spec.podReplacementPolicy: Failed
. The default replacement policy depends on whether the Job has a podFailurePolicy
set. With no Pod failure policy defined for a Job, omitting the podReplacementPolicy
field selects the TerminatingOrFailed
replacement policy: the control plane creates replacement Pods immediately upon Pod deletion (as soon as the control plane sees that a Pod for this Job has deletionTimestamp
set). For Jobs with a Pod failure policy set, the default podReplacementPolicy
is Failed
, and no other value is permitted. See Pod failure policy to learn more about Pod failure policies for Jobs.
kind: Job
metadata:
name: new
...
spec:
podReplacementPolicy: Failed
...
Provided your cluster has the feature gate enabled, you can inspect the .status.terminating
field of a Job. The value of the field is the number of Pods owned by the Job that are currently terminating.
kubectl get jobs/myjob -o yaml
apiVersion: batch/v1
kind: Job
# .metadata and .spec omitted
status:
terminating: 3 # three Pods are terminating and have not yet reached the Failed phase
Delegation of managing a Job object to external controller
FEATURE STATE: Kubernetes v1.30 [alpha]
Note: You can only set the managedBy
field on Jobs if you enable the JobManagedBy
feature gate (disabled by default).
This feature allows you to disable the built-in Job controller, for a specific Job, and delegate reconciliation of the Job to an external controller.
You indicate the controller that reconciles the Job by setting a custom value for the spec.managedBy
field - any value other than kubernetes.io/job-controller
. The value of the field is immutable.
Note: When using this feature, make sure the controller indicated by the field is installed, otherwise the Job may not be reconciled at all.
Note:
When developing an external Job controller be aware that your controller needs to operate in a fashion conformant with the definitions of the API spec and status fields of the Job object.
Please review these in detail in the Job API. We also recommend that you run the e2e conformance tests for the Job object to verify your implementation.
Finally, when developing an external Job controller make sure it does not use the batch.kubernetes.io/job-tracking
finalizer, reserved for the built-in controller.
Warning: If you are considering to disable the JobManagedBy
feature gate, or to downgrade the cluster to a version without the feature gate enabled, check if there are jobs with a custom value of the spec.managedBy
field. If there are such jobs, there is a risk that they might be reconciled by two controllers after the operation: the built-in Job controller and the external controller indicated by the field value.
Alternatives
Bare Pods
When the node that a Pod is running on reboots or fails, the pod is terminated and will not be restarted. However, a Job will create new Pods to replace terminated ones. For this reason, we recommend that you use a Job rather than a bare Pod, even if your application requires only a single Pod.
Replication Controller
Jobs are complementary to Replication Controllers. A Replication Controller manages Pods which are not expected to terminate (e.g. web servers), and a Job manages Pods that are expected to terminate (e.g. batch tasks).
As discussed in Pod Lifecycle, Job
is only appropriate for pods with RestartPolicy
equal to OnFailure
or Never
. (Note: If RestartPolicy
is not set, the default value is Always
.)
Single Job starts controller Pod
Another pattern is for a single Job to create a Pod which then creates other Pods, acting as a sort of custom controller for those Pods. This allows the most flexibility, but may be somewhat complicated to get started with and offers less integration with Kubernetes.
One example of this pattern would be a Job which starts a Pod which runs a script that in turn starts a Spark master controller (see spark example), runs a spark driver, and then cleans up.
An advantage of this approach is that the overall process gets the completion guarantee of a Job object, but maintains complete control over what Pods are created and how work is assigned to them.
What’s next
- Learn about Pods.
- Read about different ways of running Jobs:
- Coarse Parallel Processing Using a Work Queue
- Fine Parallel Processing Using a Work Queue
- Use an indexed Job for parallel processing with static work assignment
- Create multiple Jobs based on a template: Parallel Processing using Expansions
- Follow the links within Clean up finished jobs automatically to learn more about how your cluster can clean up completed and / or failed tasks.
Job
is part of the Kubernetes REST API. Read the Job object definition to understand the API for jobs.- Read about CronJob, which you can use to define a series of Jobs that will run based on a schedule, similar to the UNIX tool
cron
. - Practice how to configure handling of retriable and non-retriable pod failures using
podFailurePolicy
, based on the step-by-step examples.