- Traffic Management Problems
- Requests are rejected by Envoy
- Route rules don’t seem to affect traffic flow
- 503 errors after setting destination rule
- Route rules have no effect on ingress gateway requests
- Envoy is crashing under load
- Envoy won’t connect to my HTTP/1.0 service
- 503 error while accessing headless services
- TLS configuration mistakes
- Unchanged Envoy filter configuration suddenly stops working
- Virtual service with fault injection and retry/timeout policies not working as expected
Traffic Management Problems
Requests are rejected by Envoy
Requests may be rejected for various reasons. The best way to understand why requests are being rejected is by inspecting Envoy’s access logs. By default, access logs are output to the standard output of the container. Run the following command to see the log:
$ kubectl logs PODNAME -c istio-proxy -n NAMESPACE
In the default access log format, Envoy response flags are located after the response code, if you are using a custom log format, make sure to include %RESPONSE_FLAGS%
.
Refer to the Envoy response flags for details of response flags.
Common response flags are:
NR
: No route configured, check yourDestinationRule
orVirtualService
.UO
: Upstream overflow with circuit breaking, check your circuit breaker configuration inDestinationRule
.UF
: Failed to connect to upstream, if you’re using Istio authentication, check for a mutual TLS configuration conflict.
Route rules don’t seem to affect traffic flow
With the current Envoy sidecar implementation, up to 100 requests may be required for weighted version distribution to be observed.
If route rules are working perfectly for the Bookinfo sample, but similar version routing rules have no effect on your own application, it may be that your Kubernetes services need to be changed slightly. Kubernetes services must adhere to certain restrictions in order to take advantage of Istio’s L7 routing features. Refer to the Requirements for Pods and Services for details.
Another potential issue is that the route rules may simply be slow to take effect. The Istio implementation on Kubernetes utilizes an eventually consistent algorithm to ensure all Envoy sidecars have the correct configuration including all route rules. A configuration change will take some time to propagate to all the sidecars. With large deployments the propagation will take longer and there may be a lag time on the order of seconds.
503 errors after setting destination rule
You should only see this error if you disabled automatic mutual TLS during install.
If requests to a service immediately start generating HTTP 503 errors after you applied a DestinationRule
and the errors continue until you remove or revert the DestinationRule
, then the DestinationRule
is probably causing a TLS conflict for the service.
For example, if you configure mutual TLS in the cluster globally, the DestinationRule
must include the following trafficPolicy
:
trafficPolicy:
tls:
mode: ISTIO_MUTUAL
Otherwise, the mode defaults to DISABLE
causing client proxy sidecars to make plain HTTP requests instead of TLS encrypted requests. Thus, the requests conflict with the server proxy because the server proxy expects encrypted requests.
Whenever you apply a DestinationRule
, ensure the trafficPolicy
TLS mode matches the global server configuration.
Route rules have no effect on ingress gateway requests
Let’s assume you are using an ingress Gateway
and corresponding VirtualService
to access an internal service. For example, your VirtualService
looks something like this:
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1
kind: VirtualService
metadata:
name: myapp
spec:
hosts:
- "myapp.com" # or maybe "*" if you are testing without DNS using the ingress-gateway IP (e.g., http://1.2.3.4/hello)
gateways:
- myapp-gateway
http:
- match:
- uri:
prefix: /hello
route:
- destination:
host: helloworld.default.svc.cluster.local
- match:
...
You also have a VirtualService
which routes traffic for the helloworld service to a particular subset:
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1
kind: VirtualService
metadata:
name: helloworld
spec:
hosts:
- helloworld.default.svc.cluster.local
http:
- route:
- destination:
host: helloworld.default.svc.cluster.local
subset: v1
In this situation you will notice that requests to the helloworld service via the ingress gateway will not be directed to subset v1 but instead will continue to use default round-robin routing.
The ingress requests are using the gateway host (e.g., myapp.com
) which will activate the rules in the myapp VirtualService
that routes to any endpoint of the helloworld service. Only internal requests with the host helloworld.default.svc.cluster.local
will use the helloworld VirtualService
which directs traffic exclusively to subset v1.
To control the traffic from the gateway, you need to also include the subset rule in the myapp VirtualService
:
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1
kind: VirtualService
metadata:
name: myapp
spec:
hosts:
- "myapp.com" # or maybe "*" if you are testing without DNS using the ingress-gateway IP (e.g., http://1.2.3.4/hello)
gateways:
- myapp-gateway
http:
- match:
- uri:
prefix: /hello
route:
- destination:
host: helloworld.default.svc.cluster.local
subset: v1
- match:
...
Alternatively, you can combine both VirtualServices
into one unit if possible:
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1
kind: VirtualService
metadata:
name: myapp
spec:
hosts:
- myapp.com # cannot use "*" here since this is being combined with the mesh services
- helloworld.default.svc.cluster.local
gateways:
- mesh # applies internally as well as externally
- myapp-gateway
http:
- match:
- uri:
prefix: /hello
gateways:
- myapp-gateway #restricts this rule to apply only to ingress gateway
route:
- destination:
host: helloworld.default.svc.cluster.local
subset: v1
- match:
- gateways:
- mesh # applies to all services inside the mesh
route:
- destination:
host: helloworld.default.svc.cluster.local
subset: v1
Envoy is crashing under load
Check your ulimit -a
. Many systems have a 1024 open file descriptor limit by default which will cause Envoy to assert and crash with:
[2017-05-17 03:00:52.735][14236][critical][assert] assert failure: fd_ != -1: external/envoy/source/common/network/connection_impl.cc:58
Make sure to raise your ulimit. Example: ulimit -n 16384
Envoy won’t connect to my HTTP/1.0 service
Envoy requires HTTP/1.1
or HTTP/2
traffic for upstream services. For example, when using NGINX for serving traffic behind Envoy, you will need to set the proxy_http_version directive in your NGINX configuration to be “1.1”, since the NGINX default is 1.0.
Example configuration:
upstream http_backend {
server 127.0.0.1:8080;
keepalive 16;
}
server {
...
location /http/ {
proxy_pass http://http_backend;
proxy_http_version 1.1;
proxy_set_header Connection "";
...
}
}
503 error while accessing headless services
Assume Istio is installed with the following configuration:
mTLS mode
set toSTRICT
within the meshmeshConfig.outboundTrafficPolicy.mode
set toALLOW_ANY
Consider nginx
is deployed as a StatefulSet
in the default namespace and a corresponding Headless Service
is defined as shown below:
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: nginx
labels:
app: nginx
spec:
ports:
- port: 80
name: http-web # Explicitly defining an http port
clusterIP: None # Creates a Headless Service
selector:
app: nginx
---
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: StatefulSet
metadata:
name: web
spec:
selector:
matchLabels:
app: nginx
serviceName: "nginx"
replicas: 3
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: nginx
spec:
containers:
- name: nginx
image: registry.k8s.io/nginx-slim:0.8
ports:
- containerPort: 80
name: web
The port name http-web
in the Service definition explicitly specifies the http protocol for that port.
Let us assume we have a sleep pod Deployment
as well in the default namespace. When nginx
is accessed from this sleep
pod using its Pod IP (this is one of the common ways to access a headless service), the request goes via the PassthroughCluster
to the server-side, but the sidecar proxy on the server-side fails to find the route entry to nginx
and fails with HTTP 503 UC
.
$ export SOURCE_POD=$(kubectl get pod -l app=sleep -o jsonpath='{.items..metadata.name}')
$ kubectl exec -it $SOURCE_POD -c sleep -- curl 10.1.1.171 -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}"
503
10.1.1.171
is the Pod IP of one of the replicas of nginx
and the service is accessed on containerPort
80.
Here are some of the ways to avoid this 503 error:
Specify the correct Host header:
The Host header in the curl request above will be the Pod IP by default. Specifying the Host header as
nginx.default
in our request tonginx
successfully returnsHTTP 200 OK
.$ export SOURCE_POD=$(kubectl get pod -l app=sleep -o jsonpath='{.items..metadata.name}')
$ kubectl exec -it $SOURCE_POD -c sleep -- curl -H "Host: nginx.default" 10.1.1.171 -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}"
200
Set port name to
tcp
ortcp-web
ortcp-<custom_name>
:Here the protocol is explicitly specified as
tcp
. In this case, only theTCP Proxy
network filter on the sidecar proxy is used both on the client-side and server-side. HTTP Connection Manager is not used at all and therefore, any kind of header is not expected in the request.A request to
nginx
with or without explicitly setting the Host header successfully returnsHTTP 200 OK
.This is useful in certain scenarios where a client may not be able to include header information in the request.
$ export SOURCE_POD=$(kubectl get pod -l app=sleep -o jsonpath='{.items..metadata.name}')
$ kubectl exec -it $SOURCE_POD -c sleep -- curl 10.1.1.171 -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}"
200
$ kubectl exec -it $SOURCE_POD -c sleep -- curl -H "Host: nginx.default" 10.1.1.171 -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}"
200
Use domain name instead of Pod IP:
A specific instance of a headless service can also be accessed using just the domain name.
$ export SOURCE_POD=$(kubectl get pod -l app=sleep -o jsonpath='{.items..metadata.name}')
$ kubectl exec -it $SOURCE_POD -c sleep -- curl web-0.nginx.default -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}"
200
Here
web-0
is the pod name of one of the 3 replicas ofnginx
.
Refer to this traffic routing page for some additional information on headless services and traffic routing behavior for different protocols.
TLS configuration mistakes
Many traffic management problems are caused by incorrect TLS configuration. The following sections describe some of the most common misconfigurations.
Sending HTTPS to an HTTP port
If your application sends an HTTPS request to a service declared to be HTTP, the Envoy sidecar will attempt to parse the request as HTTP while forwarding the request, which will fail because the HTTP is unexpectedly encrypted.
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1
kind: ServiceEntry
metadata:
name: httpbin
spec:
hosts:
- httpbin.org
ports:
- number: 443
name: http
protocol: HTTP
resolution: DNS
Although the above configuration may be correct if you are intentionally sending plaintext on port 443 (e.g., curl http://httpbin.org:443
), generally port 443 is dedicated for HTTPS traffic.
Sending an HTTPS request like curl https://httpbin.org
, which defaults to port 443, will result in an error like curl: (35) error:1408F10B:SSL routines:ssl3_get_record:wrong version number
. The access logs may also show an error like 400 DPE
.
To fix this, you should change the port protocol to HTTPS:
spec:
ports:
- number: 443
name: https
protocol: HTTPS
Gateway to virtual service TLS mismatch
There are two common TLS mismatches that can occur when binding a virtual service to a gateway.
- The gateway terminates TLS while the virtual service configures TLS routing.
- The gateway does TLS passthrough while the virtual service configures HTTP routing.
Gateway with TLS termination
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1
kind: Gateway
metadata:
name: gateway
namespace: istio-system
spec:
selector:
istio: ingressgateway
servers:
- port:
number: 443
name: https
protocol: HTTPS
hosts:
- "*"
tls:
mode: SIMPLE
credentialName: sds-credential
---
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1
kind: VirtualService
metadata:
name: httpbin
spec:
hosts:
- "*.example.com"
gateways:
- istio-system/gateway
tls:
- match:
- sniHosts:
- "*.example.com"
route:
- destination:
host: httpbin.org
In this example, the gateway is terminating TLS while the virtual service is using TLS based routing. The TLS route rules will have no effect since the TLS is already terminated when the route rules are evaluated.
With this misconfiguration, you will end up getting 404 responses because the requests will be sent to HTTP routing but there are no HTTP routes configured. You can confirm this using the istioctl proxy-config routes
command.
To fix this problem, you should switch the virtual service to specify http
routing, instead of tls
:
spec:
...
http:
- match: ...
Gateway with TLS passthrough
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1
kind: Gateway
metadata:
name: gateway
spec:
selector:
istio: ingressgateway
servers:
- hosts:
- "*"
port:
name: https
number: 443
protocol: HTTPS
tls:
mode: PASSTHROUGH
---
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1
kind: VirtualService
metadata:
name: virtual-service
spec:
gateways:
- gateway
hosts:
- httpbin.example.com
http:
- route:
- destination:
host: httpbin.org
In this configuration, the virtual service is attempting to match HTTP traffic against TLS traffic passed through the gateway. This will result in the virtual service configuration having no effect. You can observe that the HTTP route is not applied using the istioctl proxy-config listener
and istioctl proxy-config route
commands.
To fix this, you should switch the virtual service to configure tls
routing:
spec:
tls:
- match:
- sniHosts: ["httpbin.example.com"]
route:
- destination:
host: httpbin.org
Alternatively, you could terminate TLS, rather than passing it through, by switching the tls
configuration in the gateway:
spec:
...
tls:
credentialName: sds-credential
mode: SIMPLE
Double TLS (TLS origination for a TLS request)
When configuring Istio to perform TLS origination, you need to make sure that the application sends plaintext requests to the sidecar, which will then originate the TLS.
The following DestinationRule
originates TLS for requests to the httpbin.org
service, but the corresponding ServiceEntry
defines the protocol as HTTPS on port 443.
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1
kind: ServiceEntry
metadata:
name: httpbin
spec:
hosts:
- httpbin.org
ports:
- number: 443
name: https
protocol: HTTPS
resolution: DNS
---
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1
kind: DestinationRule
metadata:
name: originate-tls
spec:
host: httpbin.org
trafficPolicy:
tls:
mode: SIMPLE
With this configuration, the sidecar expects the application to send TLS traffic on port 443 (e.g., curl https://httpbin.org
), but it will also perform TLS origination before forwarding requests. This will cause the requests to be double encrypted.
For example, sending a request like curl https://httpbin.org
will result in an error: (35) error:1408F10B:SSL routines:ssl3_get_record:wrong version number
.
You can fix this example by changing the port protocol in the ServiceEntry
to HTTP:
spec:
hosts:
- httpbin.org
ports:
- number: 443
name: http
protocol: HTTP
Note that with this configuration your application will need to send plaintext requests to port 443, like curl http://httpbin.org:443
, because TLS origination does not change the port. However, starting in Istio 1.8, you can expose HTTP port 80 to the application (e.g., curl http://httpbin.org
) and then redirect requests to targetPort
443 for the TLS origination:
spec:
hosts:
- httpbin.org
ports:
- number: 80
name: http
protocol: HTTP
targetPort: 443
404 errors occur when multiple gateways configured with same TLS certificate
Configuring more than one gateway using the same TLS certificate will cause browsers that leverage HTTP/2 connection reuse (i.e., most browsers) to produce 404 errors when accessing a second host after a connection to another host has already been established.
For example, let’s say you have 2 hosts that share the same TLS certificate like this:
- Wildcard certificate
*.test.com
installed inistio-ingressgateway
Gateway
configurationgw1
with hostservice1.test.com
, selectoristio: ingressgateway
, and TLS using gateway’s mounted (wildcard) certificateGateway
configurationgw2
with hostservice2.test.com
, selectoristio: ingressgateway
, and TLS using gateway’s mounted (wildcard) certificateVirtualService
configurationvs1
with hostservice1.test.com
and gatewaygw1
VirtualService
configurationvs2
with hostservice2.test.com
and gatewaygw2
Since both gateways are served by the same workload (i.e., selector istio: ingressgateway
) requests to both services (service1.test.com
and service2.test.com
) will resolve to the same IP. If service1.test.com
is accessed first, it will return the wildcard certificate (*.test.com
) indicating that connections to service2.test.com
can use the same certificate. Browsers like Chrome and Firefox will consequently reuse the existing connection for requests to service2.test.com
. Since the gateway (gw1
) has no route for service2.test.com
, it will then return a 404 (Not Found) response.
You can avoid this problem by configuring a single wildcard Gateway
, instead of two (gw1
and gw2
). Then, simply bind both VirtualServices
to it like this:
Gateway
configurationgw
with host*.test.com
, selectoristio: ingressgateway
, and TLS using gateway’s mounted (wildcard) certificateVirtualService
configurationvs1
with hostservice1.test.com
and gatewaygw
VirtualService
configurationvs2
with hostservice2.test.com
and gatewaygw
Configuring SNI routing when not sending SNI
An HTTPS Gateway
that specifies the hosts
field will perform an SNI match on incoming requests. For example, the following configuration would only allow requests that match *.example.com
in the SNI:
servers:
- port:
number: 443
name: https
protocol: HTTPS
hosts:
- "*.example.com"
This may cause certain requests to fail.
For example, if you do not have DNS set up and are instead directly setting the host header, such as curl 1.2.3.4 -H "Host: app.example.com"
, no SNI will be set, causing the request to fail. Instead, you can set up DNS or use the --resolve
flag of curl
. See the Secure Gateways task for more information.
Another common issue is load balancers in front of Istio. Most cloud load balancers will not forward the SNI, so if you are terminating TLS in your cloud load balancer you may need to do one of the following:
- Configure the cloud load balancer to instead passthrough the TLS connection
- Disable SNI matching in the
Gateway
by setting the hosts field to*
A common symptom of this is for the load balancer health checks to succeed while real traffic fails.
Unchanged Envoy filter configuration suddenly stops working
An EnvoyFilter
configuration that specifies an insert position relative to another filter can be very fragile because, by default, the order of evaluation is based on the creation time of the filters. Consider a filter with the following specification:
spec:
configPatches:
- applyTo: NETWORK_FILTER
match:
context: SIDECAR_OUTBOUND
listener:
portNumber: 443
filterChain:
filter:
name: istio.stats
patch:
operation: INSERT_BEFORE
value:
...
To work properly, this filter configuration depends on the istio.stats
filter having an older creation time than it. Otherwise, the INSERT_BEFORE
operation will be silently ignored. There will be nothing in the error log to indicate that this filter has not been added to the chain.
This is particularly problematic when matching filters, like istio.stats
, that are version specific (i.e., that include the proxyVersion
field in their match criteria). Such filters may be removed or replaced by newer ones when upgrading Istio. As a result, an EnvoyFilter
like the one above may initially be working perfectly but after upgrading Istio to a newer version it will no longer be included in the network filter chain of the sidecars.
To avoid this issue, you can either change the operation to one that does not depend on the presence of another filter (e.g., INSERT_FIRST
), or set an explicit priority in the EnvoyFilter
to override the default creation time-based ordering. For example, adding priority: 10
to the above filter will ensure that it is processed after the istio.stats
filter which has a default priority of 0.
Virtual service with fault injection and retry/timeout policies not working as expected
Currently, Istio does not support configuring fault injections and retry or timeout policies on the same VirtualService
. Consider the following configuration:
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3
kind: VirtualService
metadata:
name: helloworld
spec:
hosts:
- "*"
gateways:
- helloworld-gateway
http:
- match:
- uri:
exact: /hello
fault:
abort:
httpStatus: 500
percentage:
value: 50
retries:
attempts: 5
retryOn: 5xx
route:
- destination:
host: helloworld
port:
number: 5000
You would expect that given the configured five retry attempts, the user would almost never see any errors when calling the helloworld
service. However since both fault and retries are configured on the same VirtualService
, the retry configuration does not take effect, resulting in a 50% failure rate. To work around this issue, you may remove the fault config from your VirtualService
and inject the fault to the upstream Envoy proxy using EnvoyFilter
instead:
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3
kind: EnvoyFilter
metadata:
name: hello-world-filter
spec:
workloadSelector:
labels:
app: helloworld
configPatches:
- applyTo: HTTP_FILTER
match:
context: SIDECAR_INBOUND # will match outbound listeners in all sidecars
listener:
filterChain:
filter:
name: "envoy.filters.network.http_connection_manager"
patch:
operation: INSERT_BEFORE
value:
name: envoy.fault
typed_config:
"@type": "type.googleapis.com/envoy.extensions.filters.http.fault.v3.HTTPFault"
abort:
http_status: 500
percentage:
numerator: 50
denominator: HUNDRED
This works because this way the retry policy is configured for the client proxy while the fault injection is configured for the upstream proxy.