- 21. Envers
- 21.1. Basics
- 21.2. Configuration Properties
- 21.3. Additional mapping annotations
- 21.4. Choosing an audit strategy
- 21.5. Revision Log
- 21.6. Tracking entity names modified during revisions
- 21.7. Tracking entity changes at the property level
- 21.8. Selecting strategy for tracking property level changes
- 21.9. Queries
- 21.10. Querying for entities of a class at a given revision
- 21.11. Querying for entities using filtering criteria
- 21.12. Querying for revisions, at which entities of a given class changed
- 21.13. Querying for entity revisions that modified a given property
- 21.14. Querying for revisions of entity including property names that were modified
- 21.15. Querying for entity types modified in a given revision
- 21.16. Querying for entities using entity relation joins
- 21.17. Querying for revision information without loading entities
- 21.18. Conditional auditing
- 21.19. Understanding the Envers Schema
- 21.20. Generating Envers schema with Hibernate hbm2ddl tool
- 21.21. Mapping exceptions
- 21.22.
@OneToMany
with@JoinColumn
- 21.23. Advanced: Audit table partitioning
- 21.24. Benefits of audit table partitioning
- 21.25. Suitable columns for audit table partitioning
- 21.26. Audit table partitioning example
- 21.27. Determining a suitable partitioning column
- 21.28. Determining a suitable partitioning scheme
- 21.29. Envers links
21. Envers
21.1. Basics
To audit changes that are performed on an entity, you only need two things:
the
hibernate-envers
jar on the classpath,an
@Audited
annotation on the entity.
Unlike in previous versions, you no longer need to specify listeners in the Hibernate configuration file. Just putting the Envers jar on the classpath is enough because listeners will be registered automatically. |
And that’s all. You can create, modify and delete the entities as always.
The use of JPA’s |
If you look at the generated schema for your entities, or at the data persisted by Hibernate, you will notice that there are no changes. However, for each audited entity, a new table is introduced - entity_table_AUD
, which stores the historical data, whenever you commit a transaction.
Envers automatically creates audit tables if |
Considering we have a Customer
entity, when annotating it with the Audited
annotation, Hibernate is going to generate the following tables using the hibernate.hbm2ddl.auto
schema tool:
Example 652. Basic Envers entity mapping
@Audited
@Entity(name = "Customer")
public static class Customer {
@Id
private Long id;
private String firstName;
private String lastName;
@Temporal( TemporalType.TIMESTAMP )
@Column(name = "created_on")
@CreationTimestamp
private Date createdOn;
//Getters and setters are omitted for brevity
}
create table Customer (
id bigint not null,
created_on timestamp,
firstName varchar(255),
lastName varchar(255),
primary key (id)
)
create table Customer_AUD (
id bigint not null,
REV integer not null,
REVTYPE tinyint,
created_on timestamp,
firstName varchar(255),
lastName varchar(255),
primary key (id, REV)
)
create table REVINFO (
REV integer generated by default as identity,
REVTSTMP bigint,
primary key (REV)
)
alter table Customer_AUD
add constraint FK5ecvi1a0ykunrriib7j28vpdj
foreign key (REV)
references REVINFO
Instead of annotating the whole class and auditing all properties, you can annotate only some persistent properties with @Audited
. This will cause only these properties to be audited.
Now, considering the previous Customer
entity, let’s see how Envers auditing works when inserting, updating, and deleting the entity in question.
Example 653. Auditing the entity INSERT
operation
Customer customer = new Customer();
customer.setId( 1L );
customer.setFirstName( "John" );
customer.setLastName( "Doe" );
entityManager.persist( customer );
insert
into
Customer
(created_on, firstName, lastName, id)
values
(?, ?, ?, ?)
-- binding parameter [1] as [TIMESTAMP] - [Mon Jul 24 17:21:32 EEST 2017]
-- binding parameter [2] as [VARCHAR] - [John]
-- binding parameter [3] as [VARCHAR] - [Doe]
-- binding parameter [4] as [BIGINT] - [1]
insert
into
REVINFO
(REV, REVTSTMP)
values
(?, ?)
-- binding parameter [1] as [BIGINT] - [1]
-- binding parameter [2] as [BIGINT] - [1500906092803]
insert
into
Customer_AUD
(REVTYPE, created_on, firstName, lastName, id, REV)
values
(?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
-- binding parameter [1] as [INTEGER] - [0]
-- binding parameter [2] as [TIMESTAMP] - [Mon Jul 24 17:21:32 EEST 2017]
-- binding parameter [3] as [VARCHAR] - [John]
-- binding parameter [4] as [VARCHAR] - [Doe]
-- binding parameter [5] as [BIGINT] - [1]
-- binding parameter [6] as [INTEGER] - [1]
Example 654. Auditing the entity UPDATE
operation
Customer customer = entityManager.find( Customer.class, 1L );
customer.setLastName( "Doe Jr." );
update
Customer
set
created_on=?,
firstName=?,
lastName=?
where
id=?
-- binding parameter [1] as [TIMESTAMP] - [2017-07-24 17:21:32.757]
-- binding parameter [2] as [VARCHAR] - [John]
-- binding parameter [3] as [VARCHAR] - [Doe Jr.]
-- binding parameter [4] as [BIGINT] - [1]
insert
into
REVINFO
(REV, REVTSTMP)
values
(?, ?)
-- binding parameter [1] as [BIGINT] - [2]
-- binding parameter [2] as [BIGINT] - [1500906092853]
insert
into
Customer_AUD
(REVTYPE, created_on, firstName, lastName, id, REV)
values
(?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
-- binding parameter [1] as [INTEGER] - [1]
-- binding parameter [2] as [TIMESTAMP] - [2017-07-24 17:21:32.757]
-- binding parameter [3] as [VARCHAR] - [John]
-- binding parameter [4] as [VARCHAR] - [Doe Jr.]
-- binding parameter [5] as [BIGINT] - [1]
-- binding parameter [6] as [INTEGER] - [2]
Example 655. Auditing the entity DELETE
operation
Customer customer = entityManager.getReference( Customer.class, 1L );
entityManager.remove( customer );
delete
from
Customer
where
id = ?
-- binding parameter [1] as [BIGINT] - [1]
insert
into
REVINFO
(REV, REVTSTMP)
values
(?, ?)
-- binding parameter [1] as [BIGINT] - [3]
-- binding parameter [2] as [BIGINT] - [1500906092876]
insert
into
Customer_AUD
(REVTYPE, created_on, firstName, lastName, id, REV)
values
(?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
-- binding parameter [1] as [INTEGER] - [2]
-- binding parameter [2] as [TIMESTAMP] - [null]
-- binding parameter [3] as [VARCHAR] - [null]
-- binding parameter [4] as [VARCHAR] - [null]
-- binding parameter [5] as [BIGINT] - [1]
-- binding parameter [6] as [INTEGER] - [3]
The REVTYPE
column value is taken from the RevisionType
Enum.
Database column value | Associated | Description |
0 |
| A database table row was inserted. |
1 |
| A database table row was updated. |
2 |
| A database table row was deleted. |
The audit (history) of an entity can be accessed using the AuditReader
interface, which can be obtained by having an open EntityManager
or Session
via the AuditReaderFactory
.
Example 656. Getting a list of revisions for the Customer
entity
List<Number> revisions = doInJPA( this::entityManagerFactory, entityManager -> {
return AuditReaderFactory.get( entityManager ).getRevisions(
Customer.class,
1L
);
} );
select
c.REV as col_0_0_
from
Customer_AUD c
cross join
REVINFO r
where
c.id = ?
and c.REV = r.REV
order by
c.REV asc
-- binding parameter [1] as [BIGINT] - [1]
Using the previously fetched revisions, we can now inspect the state of the Customer
entity at that particular revision:
Example 657. Getting the first revision for the Customer
entity
Customer customer = (Customer) AuditReaderFactory
.get( entityManager )
.createQuery()
.forEntitiesAtRevision( Customer.class, revisions.get( 0 ) )
.getSingleResult();
assertEquals("Doe", customer.getLastName());
select
c.id as id1_1_,
c.REV as REV2_1_,
c.REVTYPE as REVTYPE3_1_,
c.created_on as created_4_1_,
c.firstName as firstNam5_1_,
c.lastName as lastName6_1_
from
Customer_AUD c
where
c.REV = (
select
max( c_max.REV )
from
Customer_AUD c_max
where
c_max.REV <= ?
and c.id = c_max.id
)
and c.REVTYPE <> ?
-- binding parameter [1] as [INTEGER] - [1]
-- binding parameter [2] as [INTEGER] - [2]
When executing the aforementioned SQL query, there are two parameters:
revision_number
The first parameter marks the revision number we are interested in or the latest one that exists up to this particular revision.
revision_type
The second parameter specifies that we are not interested in DEL
RevisionType
so that deleted entries are filtered out.
The same goes for the second revision associated with the UPDATE
statement.
Example 658. Getting the second revision for the Customer
entity
Customer customer = (Customer) AuditReaderFactory
.get( entityManager )
.createQuery()
.forEntitiesAtRevision( Customer.class, revisions.get( 1 ) )
.getSingleResult();
assertEquals("Doe Jr.", customer.getLastName());
For the deleted entity revision, Envers throws a NoResultException
since the entity was no longer valid at that revision.
Example 659. Getting the third revision for the Customer
entity
try {
Customer customer = (Customer) AuditReaderFactory
.get( entityManager )
.createQuery()
.forEntitiesAtRevision( Customer.class, revisions.get( 2 ) )
.getSingleResult();
fail("The Customer was deleted at this revision: " + revisions.get( 2 ));
}
catch (NoResultException expected) {
}
You can use the forEntitiesAtRevision(Class<T> cls, String entityName, Number revision, boolean includeDeletions)
method to get the deleted entity revision so that, instead of a NoResultException
, all attributes, except for the entity identifier, are going to be null
.
Example 660. Getting the third revision for the Customer
entity without getting a NoResultException
Customer customer = (Customer) AuditReaderFactory
.get( entityManager )
.createQuery()
.forEntitiesAtRevision(
Customer.class,
Customer.class.getName(),
revisions.get( 2 ),
true )
.getSingleResult();
assertEquals( Long.valueOf( 1L ), customer.getId() );
assertNull( customer.getFirstName() );
assertNull( customer.getLastName() );
assertNull( customer.getCreatedOn() );
See the Javadocs for details on other functionality offered.
21.2. Configuration Properties
It is possible to configure various aspects of Hibernate Envers behavior, such as table names, etc.
**org.hibernate.envers.audit_table_prefix**
String that will be prepended to the name of an audited entity to create the name of the entity and that will hold audit information.
**org.hibernate.envers.audit_table_suffix**
(default: _AUD
)
String that will be appended to the name of an audited entity to create the name of the entity and that will hold audit information.
If you audit an entity with a table name Person, in the default setting Envers will generate a Person_AUD
table to store historical data.
**org.hibernate.envers.revision_field_name**
(default: REV
)
Name of a field in the audit entity that will hold the revision number.
**org.hibernate.envers.revision_type_field_name**
(default: REVTYPE
)
Name of a field in the audit entity that will hold the type of the revision (currently, this can be: add
, mod
, del
).
**org.hibernate.envers.revision_on_collection_change**
(default: true
)
Should a revision be generated when a not-owned relation field changes (this can be either a collection in a one-to-many relation or the field using mappedBy
attribute in a one-to-one relation).
**org.hibernate.envers.do_not_audit_optimistic_locking_field**
(default: true
)
When true, properties to be used for optimistic locking, annotated with @Version
, will not be automatically audited (their history won’t be stored; it normally doesn’t make sense to store it).
**org.hibernate.envers.store_data_at_delete**
(default: false
)
Should the entity data be stored in the revision when the entity is deleted (instead of only storing the id and all other properties as null).
This is not normally needed, as the data is present in the last-but-one revision. Sometimes, however, it is easier and more efficient to access it in the last revision (then the data that the entity contained before deletion is stored twice).
**org.hibernate.envers.default_schema**
(default: null
- same schema as the table being audited)
The default schema name that should be used for audit tables.
Can be overridden using the @AuditTable( schema = "…" )
annotation.
If not present, the schema will be the same as the schema of the table being audited.
**org.hibernate.envers.default_catalog**
(default: null
- same catalog as the table being audited)
The default catalog name that should be used for audit tables.
Can be overridden using the @AuditTable( catalog = "…" )
annotation.
If not present, the catalog will be the same as the catalog of the normal tables.
**org.hibernate.envers.audit_strategy**
(default: org.hibernate.envers.strategy.DefaultAuditStrategy
)
The audit strategy that should be used when persisting audit data. The default stores only the revision, at which an entity was modified.
An alternative, the org.hibernate.envers.strategy.ValidityAuditStrategy
stores both the start revision and the end revision. Together these define when an audit row was valid, hence the name ValidityAuditStrategy.
**org.hibernate.envers.audit_strategy_validity_end_rev_field_name**
(default: REVEND
)
The column name that will hold the end revision number in audit entities. This property is only valid if the validity audit strategy is used.
**org.hibernate.envers.audit_strategy_validity_store_revend_timestamp**
(default: false
)
Should the timestamp of the end revision be stored, until which the data was valid, in addition to the end revision itself. This is useful to be able to purge old Audit records out of a relational database by using table partitioning.
Partitioning requires a column that exists within the table. This property is only evaluated if the ValidityAuditStrategy
is used.
**org.hibernate.envers.audit_strategy_validity_revend_timestamp_field_name**
(default: REVEND_TSTMP
)
Column name of the timestamp of the end revision until which the data was valid. Only used if the ValidityAuditStrategy
is used, and org.hibernate.envers.audit_strategy_validity_store_revend_timestamp
evaluates to true.
**org.hibernate.envers.use_revision_entity_with_native_id**
(default: true
)
Boolean flag that determines the strategy of revision number generation. Default implementation of revision entity uses native identifier generator.
If the current database engine does not support identity columns, users are advised to set this property to false.
In this case revision numbers are created by preconfigured org.hibernate.id.enhanced.SequenceStyleGenerator
. See: org.hibernate.envers.DefaultRevisionEntity
and org.hibernate.envers.enhanced.SequenceIdRevisionEntity
.
**org.hibernate.envers.track_entities_changed_in_revision**
(default: false
)
Should entity types, that have been modified during each revision, be tracked. The default implementation creates REVCHANGES
table that stores entity names of modified persistent objects. Single record encapsulates the revision identifier (foreign key to REVINFO
table) and a string value. For more information, refer to Tracking entity names modified during revisions and Querying for entity types modified in a given revision.
**org.hibernate.envers.global_with_modified_flag**
(default: false
, can be individually overridden with @Audited( withModifiedFlag = true )
)
Should property modification flags be stored for all audited entities and all properties.
When set to true, for all properties an additional boolean column in the audit tables will be created, filled with information if the given property changed in the given revision.
When set to false, such column can be added to selected entities or properties using the @Audited
annotation.
For more information, refer to Tracking entity changes at the property level and Querying for entity revisions that modified a given property.
**org.hibernate.envers.modified_flag_suffix**
(default: _MOD
)
The suffix for columns storing “Modified Flags”.
For example, a property called “age”, will by default get modified flag with column name “age_MOD”.
**org.hibernate.envers.modified_column_naming_strategy**
(default: org.hibernate.envers.boot.internal.LegacyModifiedColumnNamingStrategy
)
The naming strategy to be used for modified flag columns in the audit metadata.
**org.hibernate.envers.embeddable_set_ordinal_field_name**
(default: SETORDINAL
)
Name of column used for storing ordinal of the change in sets of embeddable elements.
**org.hibernate.envers.cascade_delete_revision**
(default: false
)
While deleting revision entry, remove data of associated audited entities. Requires database support for cascade row removal.
**org.hibernate.envers.allow_identifier_reuse**
(default: false
)
Guarantees proper validity audit strategy behavior when application reuses identifiers of deleted entities. Exactly one row with null
end date exists for each identifier.
**org.hibernate.envers.original_id_prop_name**
(default: originalId
)
Specifies the composite-id key property name used by the audit table mappings.
**org.hibernate.envers.find_by_revision_exact_match**
(default: false
)
Specifies whether or not AuditReader#find
methods which accept a revision-number argument are to find results based on fuzzy-match or exact-match behavior.
The old (legacy) behavior has always been to perform a fuzzy-match where these methods would return a match if any revision existed for the primary-key with a revision-number less-than or equal-to the revision method argument. This behavior is great when you want to find the snapshot of a non-related entity based on another entity’s revision number.
The new (optional) behavior when this option is enabled forces the query to perform an exact-match instead. In order for these methods to return a non-null
value, a revision entry must exist for the entity with the specified primary key and revision number; otherwise the result will be null
.
The following configuration options have been added recently and should be regarded as experimental:
|
21.3. Additional mapping annotations
The name of the audit table can be set on a per-entity basis, using the @AuditTable
annotation. It may be tedious to add this annotation to every audited entity, so if possible, it’s better to use a prefix/suffix.
If you have a mapping with secondary tables, audit tables for them will be generated in the same way (by adding the prefix and suffix). If you wish to overwrite this behavior, you can use the @SecondaryAuditTable
and @SecondaryAuditTables
annotations.
If you’d like to override auditing behavior of some fields/properties inherited from @MappedSuperclass
or in an embedded component, you can apply the @AuditOverride
annotation on the subtype or usage site of the component.
If you want to audit a relation mapped with @OneToMany
and @JoinColumn
, please see Mapping exceptions for a description of the additional @AuditJoinTable
annotation that you’ll probably want to use.
If you want to audit a relation, where the target entity is not audited (that is the case for example with dictionary-like entities, which don’t change and don’t have to be audited), just annotate it with @Audited( targetAuditMode = RelationTargetAuditMode.NOT_AUDITED )
. Then, while reading historic versions of your entity, the relation will always point to the “current” related entity. By default Envers throws javax.persistence.EntityNotFoundException
when “current” entity does not exist in the database. Apply @NotFound( action = NotFoundAction.IGNORE )
annotation to silence the exception and assign null value instead. The hereby solution causes implicit eager loading of to-one relations.
If you’d like to audit properties of a superclass of an entity, which are not explicitly audited (they don’t have the @Audited
annotation on any properties or on the class), you can set the @AuditOverride( forClass = SomeEntity.class, isAudited = true/false )
annotation.
The |
21.4. Choosing an audit strategy
After the basic configuration, it is important to choose the audit strategy that will be used to persist and retrieve audit information. There is a trade-off between the performance of persisting and the performance of querying the audit information. Currently, there are two audit strategies.
The default audit strategy persists the audit data together with a start revision. For each row inserted, updated or deleted in an audited table, one or more rows are inserted in the audit tables, together with the start revision of its validity. Rows in the audit tables are never updated after insertion. Queries of audit information use subqueries to select the applicable rows in the audit tables.
These subqueries are notoriously slow and difficult to index. The alternative is a validity audit strategy. This strategy stores the start-revision and the end-revision of audit information. For each row inserted, updated or deleted in an audited table, one or more rows are inserted in the audit tables, together with the start revision of its validity. But at the same time, the end-revision field of the previous audit rows (if available) is set to this revision. Queries on the audit information can then use ‘between start and end revision’ instead of subqueries as used by the default audit strategy.
The consequence of this strategy is that persisting audit information will be a bit slower because of the extra updates involved, but retrieving audit information will be a lot faster.
This can be improved even further by adding extra indexes.
21.4.1. Configuring the ValidityAuditStrategy
To better visualize how the ValidityAuditStrategy
works, consider the following exercise where we replay the previous audit logging example for the Customer
entity.
First, you need to configure the ValidityAuditStrategy
:
Example 661. Configuring the ValidityAuditStrategy
options.put(
EnversSettings.AUDIT_STRATEGY,
ValidityAuditStrategy.class.getName()
);
If, you’re using the persistence.xml
configuration file, then the mapping will look as follows:
<property
name="org.hibernate.envers.audit_strategy"
value="org.hibernate.envers.strategy.ValidityAuditStrategy"
/>
Once you configured the ValidityAuditStrategy
, the following schema is going to be automatically generated:
Example 662. Envers schema for the ValidityAuditStrategy
create table Customer (
id bigint not null,
created_on timestamp,
firstName varchar(255),
lastName varchar(255),
primary key (id)
)
create table Customer_AUD (
id bigint not null,
REV integer not null,
REVTYPE tinyint,
REVEND integer,
created_on timestamp,
firstName varchar(255),
lastName varchar(255),
primary key (id, REV)
)
create table REVINFO (
REV integer generated by default as identity,
REVTSTMP bigint,
primary key (REV)
)
alter table Customer_AUD
add constraint FK5ecvi1a0ykunrriib7j28vpdj
foreign key (REV)
references REVINFO
alter table Customer_AUD
add constraint FKqd4fy7ww1yy95wi4wtaonre3f
foreign key (REVEND)
references REVINFO
As you can see, the REVEND
column is added as well as its foreign key to the REVINFO
table.
When rerunning the previous Customer
audit log queries against the ValidityAuditStrategy
, we get the following results:
Example 663. Getting the first revision for the Customer
entity
select
c.id as id1_1_,
c.REV as REV2_1_,
c.REVTYPE as REVTYPE3_1_,
c.REVEND as REVEND4_1_,
c.created_on as created_5_1_,
c.firstName as firstNam6_1_,
c.lastName as lastName7_1_
from
Customer_AUD c
where
c.REV <= ?
and c.REVTYPE <> ?
and (
c.REVEND > ?
or c.REVEND is null
)
-- binding parameter [1] as [INTEGER] - [1]
-- binding parameter [2] as [INTEGER] - [2]
-- binding parameter [3] as [INTEGER] - [1]
Compared to the default strategy, the |
21.5. Revision Log
When Envers starts a new revision, it creates a new revision entity which stores information about the revision.
By default, that includes just:
revision number
An integral value (int/Integer
or long/Long
). Essentially, the primary key of the revision.
A revision number value should always be increasing and never overflows. The default implementations provided by Envers use an In the event that the revision number reaches its upper bounds wrapping around becoming negative, an |
revision timestamp
Either a long/Long
or java.util.Date
value representing the instant at which the revision was made. When using a java.util.Date
, instead of a long/Long
for the revision timestamp, take care not to store it to a column data type which will lose precision.
Envers handles this information as an entity. By default it uses its own internal class to act as the entity, mapped to the REVINFO
table. You can, however, supply your own approach to collecting this information which might be useful to capture additional details such as who made a change or the IP address from which the request came. There are two things you need to make this work:
First, you will need to tell Envers about the entity you wish to use. Your entity must use the
@org.hibernate.envers.RevisionEntity
annotation. It must define the two attributes described above annotated with@org.hibernate.envers.RevisionNumber
and@org.hibernate.envers.RevisionTimestamp
, respectively. You can extend fromorg.hibernate.envers.DefaultRevisionEntity
, if you wish, to inherit all these required behaviors.Simply add the custom revision entity as you do your normal entities and Envers will find it.
It is an error for there to be multiple entities marked as @org.hibernate.envers.RevisionEntity
.Second, you need to tell Envers how to create instances of your revision entity which is handled by the
newRevision( Object revisionEntity )
method of theorg.hibernate.envers.RevisionListener
interface.You tell Envers your custom
org.hibernate.envers.RevisionListener
implementation to use by specifying it on the@org.hibernate.envers.RevisionEntity
annotation, using the value attribute. If yourRevisionListener
class is inaccessible from@RevisionEntity
(e.g. it exists in a different module), setorg.hibernate.envers.revision_listener
property to its fully qualified class name. Class name defined by the configuration parameter overrides the revision entity’s value attribute.
Considering we have a CurrentUser
utility which stores the currently logged user:
Example 664. CurrentUser
utility
public static class CurrentUser {
public static final CurrentUser INSTANCE = new CurrentUser();
private static final ThreadLocal<String> storage = new ThreadLocal<>();
public void logIn(String user) {
storage.set( user );
}
public void logOut() {
storage.remove();
}
public String get() {
return storage.get();
}
}
Now, we need to provide a custom @RevisionEntity
to store the currently logged user
Example 665. Custom @RevisionEntity
example
@Entity(name = "CustomRevisionEntity")
@Table(name = "CUSTOM_REV_INFO")
@RevisionEntity( CustomRevisionEntityListener.class )
public static class CustomRevisionEntity extends DefaultRevisionEntity {
private String username;
public String getUsername() {
return username;
}
public void setUsername( String username ) {
this.username = username;
}
}
With the custom RevisionEntity
implementation in place, we only need to provide the RevisionEntity
implementation which acts as a factory of RevisionEntity
instances.
Example 666. Custom @RevisionListener
example
public static class CustomRevisionEntityListener implements RevisionListener {
public void newRevision( Object revisionEntity ) {
CustomRevisionEntity customRevisionEntity =
( CustomRevisionEntity ) revisionEntity;
customRevisionEntity.setUsername(
CurrentUser.INSTANCE.get()
);
}
}
When generating the database schema, Envers creates the following RevisionEntity
table:
Example 667. Auto-generated RevisionEntity
Envers table
create table CUSTOM_REV_INFO (
id integer not null,
timestamp bigint not null,
username varchar(255),
primary key (id)
)
You can see the username
column in place.
Now, when inserting a Customer
entity, Envers generates the following statements:
Example 668. Auditing using the custom @RevisionEntity
instance
CurrentUser.INSTANCE.logIn( "Vlad Mihalcea" );
doInJPA( this::entityManagerFactory, entityManager -> {
Customer customer = new Customer();
customer.setId( 1L );
customer.setFirstName( "John" );
customer.setLastName( "Doe" );
entityManager.persist( customer );
} );
CurrentUser.INSTANCE.logOut();
insert
into
Customer
(created_on, firstName, lastName, id)
values
(?, ?, ?, ?)
-- binding parameter [1] as [TIMESTAMP] - [Thu Jul 27 15:45:00 EEST 2017]
-- binding parameter [2] as [VARCHAR] - [John]
-- binding parameter [3] as [VARCHAR] - [Doe]
-- binding parameter [4] as [BIGINT] - [1]
insert
into
CUSTOM_REV_INFO
(timestamp, username, id)
values
(?, ?, ?)
-- binding parameter [1] as [BIGINT] - [1501159500888]
-- binding parameter [2] as [VARCHAR] - [Vlad Mihalcea]
-- binding parameter [3] as [INTEGER] - [1]
insert
into
Customer_AUD
(REVTYPE, created_on, firstName, lastName, id, REV)
values
(?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
-- binding parameter [1] as [INTEGER] - [0]
-- binding parameter [2] as [TIMESTAMP] - [Thu Jul 27 15:45:00 EEST 2017]
-- binding parameter [3] as [VARCHAR] - [John]
-- binding parameter [4] as [VARCHAR] - [Doe]
-- binding parameter [5] as [BIGINT] - [1]
-- binding parameter [6] as [INTEGER] - [1]
As demonstrated by the example above, the username is properly set and propagated to the CUSTOM_REV_INFO
table.
This strategy is deprecated since version 5.2. The alternative is to use dependency injection offered as of version 5.3. An alternative method to using the The method accepts a
|
As of Hibernate Envers 5.3, dependency injection is now supported for a This feature is up to the various dependency frameworks, such as CDI and Spring, to supply the necessary implementation during Hibernate ORM bootstrap to support injection. If no qualifying implementation is supplied, the |
21.6. Tracking entity names modified during revisions
By default, entity types that have been changed in each revision are not being tracked. This implies the necessity to query all tables storing audited data in order to retrieve changes made during the specified revision. Envers provides a simple mechanism that creates REVCHANGES
table which stores entity names of modified persistent objects. Single record encapsulates the revision identifier (foreign key to REVINFO
table) and a string value.
Tracking of modified entity names can be enabled in three different ways:
Set
org.hibernate.envers.track_entities_changed_in_revision
parameter totrue
. In this caseorg.hibernate.envers.DefaultTrackingModifiedEntitiesRevisionEntity
will be implicitly used as the revision log entity.Create a custom revision entity that extends
org.hibernate.envers.DefaultTrackingModifiedEntitiesRevisionEntity
class.@Entity(name = "CustomTrackingRevisionEntity")
@Table(name = "TRACKING_REV_INFO")
@RevisionEntity
public static class CustomTrackingRevisionEntity
extends DefaultTrackingModifiedEntitiesRevisionEntity {
}
Mark an appropriate field of a custom revision entity with
@org.hibernate.envers.ModifiedEntityNames
annotation. The property is required to be ofSet<String>
type.@Entity(name = "CustomTrackingRevisionEntity")
@Table(name = "TRACKING_REV_INFO")
@RevisionEntity
public static class CustomTrackingRevisionEntity extends DefaultRevisionEntity {
@ElementCollection
@JoinTable(
name = "REVCHANGES",
joinColumns = @JoinColumn( name = "REV" )
)
@Column( name = "ENTITYNAME" )
@ModifiedEntityNames
private Set<String> modifiedEntityNames = new HashSet<>();
public Set<String> getModifiedEntityNames() {
return modifiedEntityNames;
}
}
Considering we have a Customer
entity illustrated by the following example:
Example 669. Customer
entity before renaming
@Audited
@Entity(name = "Customer")
public static class Customer {
@Id
private Long id;
private String firstName;
private String lastName;
@Temporal( TemporalType.TIMESTAMP )
@Column(name = "created_on")
@CreationTimestamp
private Date createdOn;
//Getters and setters are omitted for brevity
}
If the Customer
entity class name is changed to ApplicationCustomer
, Envers is going to insert a new record in the REVCHANGES
table with the previous entity class name:
Example 670. Customer
entity after renaming
@Audited
@Entity(name = "Customer")
public static class ApplicationCustomer {
@Id
private Long id;
private String firstName;
private String lastName;
@Temporal( TemporalType.TIMESTAMP )
@Column(name = "created_on")
@CreationTimestamp
private Date createdOn;
//Getters and setters are omitted for brevity
}
insert
into
REVCHANGES
(REV, ENTITYNAME)
values
(?, ?)
-- binding parameter [1] as [INTEGER] - [1]
-- binding parameter [2] as [VARCHAR] - [org.hibernate.userguide.envers.EntityTypeChangeAuditTest$Customer]
Users, that have chosen one of the approaches listed above, can retrieve all entities modified in a specified revision by utilizing API described in Querying for entity types modified in a given revision.
Users are also allowed to implement custom mechanisms of tracking modified entity types. In this case, they shall pass their own implementation of org.hibernate.envers.EntityTrackingRevisionListener
interface as the value of @org.hibernate.envers.RevisionEntity
annotation.
EntityTrackingRevisionListener
interface exposes one method that notifies whenever audited entity instance has been added, modified or removed within current revision boundaries.
Example 671. The EntityTrackingRevisionListener
implementation
public static class CustomTrackingRevisionListener implements EntityTrackingRevisionListener {
@Override
public void entityChanged(Class entityClass,
String entityName,
Serializable entityId,
RevisionType revisionType,
Object revisionEntity ) {
String type = entityClass.getName();
( (CustomTrackingRevisionEntity) revisionEntity ).addModifiedEntityType( type );
}
@Override
public void newRevision( Object revisionEntity ) {
}
}
The CustomTrackingRevisionListener
adds the fully-qualified class name to the modifiedEntityTypes
attribute of the CustomTrackingRevisionEntity
.
Example 672. The RevisionEntity
using the custom EntityTrackingRevisionListener
@Entity(name = "CustomTrackingRevisionEntity")
@Table(name = "TRACKING_REV_INFO")
@RevisionEntity( CustomTrackingRevisionListener.class )
public static class CustomTrackingRevisionEntity {
@Id
@GeneratedValue
@RevisionNumber
private int customId;
@RevisionTimestamp
private long customTimestamp;
@OneToMany(
mappedBy="revision",
cascade={
CascadeType.PERSIST,
CascadeType.REMOVE
}
)
private Set<EntityType> modifiedEntityTypes = new HashSet<>();
public Set<EntityType> getModifiedEntityTypes() {
return modifiedEntityTypes;
}
public void addModifiedEntityType(String entityClassName ) {
modifiedEntityTypes.add( new EntityType( this, entityClassName ) );
}
}
The CustomTrackingRevisionEntity
contains a @OneToMany
list of ModifiedTypeRevisionEntity
Example 673. The EntityType
encapsulates the entity type name before a class name modification
@Entity(name = "EntityType")
public static class EntityType {
@Id
@GeneratedValue
private Integer id;
@ManyToOne
private CustomTrackingRevisionEntity revision;
private String entityClassName;
private EntityType() {
}
public EntityType(CustomTrackingRevisionEntity revision, String entityClassName) {
this.revision = revision;
this.entityClassName = entityClassName;
}
//Getters and setters are omitted for brevity
}
Now, when fetching the CustomTrackingRevisionEntity
, you can get access to the previous entity class name.
Example 674. Getting the EntityType
through the CustomTrackingRevisionEntity
AuditReader auditReader = AuditReaderFactory.get( entityManager );
List<Number> revisions = auditReader.getRevisions(
ApplicationCustomer.class,
1L
);
CustomTrackingRevisionEntity revEntity = auditReader.findRevision(
CustomTrackingRevisionEntity.class,
revisions.get( 0 )
);
Set<EntityType> modifiedEntityTypes = revEntity.getModifiedEntityTypes();
assertEquals( 1, modifiedEntityTypes.size() );
EntityType entityType = modifiedEntityTypes.iterator().next();
assertEquals(
Customer.class.getName(),
entityType.getEntityClassName()
);
21.7. Tracking entity changes at the property level
By default, the only information stored by Envers are revisions of modified entities. This approach lets users create audit queries based on historical values of entity properties. Sometimes it is useful to store additional metadata for each revision, when you are interested also in the type of changes, not only about the resulting values.
The feature described in Tracking entity names modified during revisions makes it possible to tell which entities were modified in a given revision.
The feature described here takes it one step further. Modification Flags enable Envers to track which properties of audited entities were modified in a given revision.
Tracking entity changes at the property level can be enabled by:
setting
org.hibernate.envers.global_with_modified_flag
configuration property totrue
. This global switch will cause adding modification flags to be stored for all audited properties of all audited entities.using
@Audited( withModifiedFlag = true )
on a property or on an entity.
The trade-off coming with this functionality is an increased size of audit tables and a very little, almost negligible, performance drop during audit writes. This is due to the fact that every tracked property has to have an accompanying boolean column in the schema that stores information about the property modifications. Of course, it is Enver’s job to fill these columns accordingly - no additional work by the developer is required. Because of costs mentioned, it is recommended to enable the feature selectively, when needed with use of the granular configuration means described above.
Example 675. Mapping for tracking entity changes at the property level
@Audited(withModifiedFlag = true)
@Entity(name = "Customer")
public static class Customer {
@Id
private Long id;
private String firstName;
private String lastName;
@Temporal( TemporalType.TIMESTAMP )
@Column(name = "created_on")
@CreationTimestamp
private Date createdOn;
//Getters and setters are omitted for brevity
}
create table Customer_AUD (
id bigint not null,
REV integer not null,
REVTYPE tinyint,
created_on timestamp,
createdOn_MOD boolean,
firstName varchar(255),
firstName_MOD boolean,
lastName varchar(255),
lastName_MOD boolean,
primary key (id, REV)
)
As you can see, every property features a _MOD
column (e.g. createdOn_MOD
) in the audit log.
Example 676. Tracking entity changes at the property level example
Customer customer = entityManager.find( Customer.class, 1L );
customer.setLastName( "Doe Jr." );
update
Customer
set
created_on = ?,
firstName = ?,
lastName = ?
where
id = ?
-- binding parameter [1] as [TIMESTAMP] - [2017-07-31 15:58:20.342]
-- binding parameter [2] as [VARCHAR] - [John]
-- binding parameter [3] as [VARCHAR] - [Doe Jr.]
-- binding parameter [4] as [BIGINT] - [1]
insert
into
REVINFO
(REV, REVTSTMP)
values
(null, ?)
-- binding parameter [1] as [BIGINT] - [1501505900439]
insert
into
Customer_AUD
(REVTYPE, created_on, createdOn_MOD, firstName, firstName_MOD, lastName, lastName_MOD, id, REV)
values
(?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
-- binding parameter [1] as [INTEGER] - [1]
-- binding parameter [2] as [TIMESTAMP] - [2017-07-31 15:58:20.342]
-- binding parameter [3] as [BOOLEAN] - [false]
-- binding parameter [4] as [VARCHAR] - [John]
-- binding parameter [5] as [BOOLEAN] - [false]
-- binding parameter [6] as [VARCHAR] - [Doe Jr.]
-- binding parameter [7] as [BOOLEAN] - [true]
-- binding parameter [8] as [BIGINT] - [1]
-- binding parameter [9] as [INTEGER] - [2]
To see how “Modified Flags” can be utilized, check out the very simple query API that uses them: Querying for entity revisions that modified a given property.
21.8. Selecting strategy for tracking property level changes
By default, Envers uses the legacy
modified column naming strategy. This strategy is designed to add columns based on the following rule-set:
If property is annotated with
@Audited
and the modifiedColumnName attribute is specified, the column will directly be based on the supplied name.If property is not annotated with
@Audited
or if no modifiedColumnName attribute is given, the column will be named after the java class property, appended with the configured suffix, the default being_MOD
.
While this strategy has no performance drawbacks, it does present concerns for users who prefer consistency without verbosity. Lets take the following entity mapping as an example.
@Audited(withModifiedFlags = true)
@Entity
public class Customer {
@Id
private Integer id;
@Column(name = "customer_name")
private String name;
}
This mapping will actually lead to some inconsistent naming between columns, see below for how the model’s name will be stored in customer_name
but the modified column that tracks whether this column changes between revisions is named name_MOD
.
CREATE TABLE Customer_AUD (
id bigint not null,
REV integer not null,
REVTYPE tinyint not null,
customer_name varchar(255),
name_MOD boolean,
primary key(id, REV)
)
An additional strategy called improved
, aims to address these inconsistent column naming concerns. This strategy uses the following rule-set:
Property is a Basic type (Single Column valued property)
Use the modifiedColumnName directly if one is supplied on the property mapping
Otherwise use the resolved ORM column name appended with the modified flag suffix configured value
Property is an Association (to-one mapping) with a Foreign Key using a single column
Use the modifiedColumnName directly if one is supplied on the property mapping
Otherwise use the resolved ORM column name appended with the modified flag suffix configured value
Property is an Association (to-one mapping) with a Foreign Key using multiple columns
Use the modifiedColumnName directly if one is supplied on the property mapping
Otherwise use the property name appended with the modified flag suffix configured value
Property is an Embeddable
Use the modifiedColumnName directly if one is supplied on the property mapping
Otherwise use the property name appended with the modified flag suffix configured value
While using this strategy, the same Customer
mapping will generate the following table schema:
CREATE TABLE Customer_AUD (
id bigint not null,
REV integer not null,
REVTYPE tinyint not null,
customer_name varchar(255),
customer_name_MOD boolean,
primary key(id, REV)
)
When already using Envers in conjunction with the modified columns flag feature, it is advised not to enable the new strategy immediately as schema changes would be required. You will need to either migrate your existing schema manually to adhere to the rules above or use the explicit modifiedColumnName attribute on the @Audited
annotation for existing columns that use the feature.
To configure a custom strategy implementation or use the improved strategy, the configuration option org.hibernate.envers.modified_column_naming_strategy
will need to be set. This option can be the fully qualified class name of a ModifiedColumnNameStrategy
implementation or legacy
or improved
for either of the two provided implementations.
21.9. Queries
You can think of historic data as having two dimensions:
horizontal
The state of the database at a given revision. Thus, you can query for entities as they were at revision N.
vertical
The revisions, at which entities changed. Hence, you can query for revisions, in which a given entity changed.
The queries in Envers are similar to Hibernate Criteria queries, so if you are familiar with them, using Envers queries will be much easier.
The main limitation of the current queries implementation is that you cannot traverse relations. You can only specify constraints on the ids of the related entities, and only on the “owning” side of the relation. This, however, will be changed in future releases.
The queries on the audited data will be in many cases much slower than corresponding queries on “live” data, as, especially for the default audit strategy, they involve correlated subselects. Queries are improved both in terms of speed and possibilities when using the validity audit strategy, which stores both start and end revisions for entities. See Configuring the |
21.10. Querying for entities of a class at a given revision
The entry point for this type of queries is:
Example 677. Getting the Customer
entity at a given revision
Customer customer = (Customer) AuditReaderFactory
.get( entityManager )
.createQuery()
.forEntitiesAtRevision( Customer.class, revisions.get( 0 ) )
.getSingleResult();
assertEquals("Doe", customer.getLastName());
21.11. Querying for entities using filtering criteria
You can then specify constraints, which should be met by the entities returned, by adding restrictions, which can be obtained using the AuditEntity
factory class.
For example, to select only entities where the firstName
property is equal to “John”:
Example 678. Getting the Customer
audit log with a given firstName
attribute value
List<Customer> customers = AuditReaderFactory
.get( entityManager )
.createQuery()
.forRevisionsOfEntity( Customer.class, true, true )
.add( AuditEntity.property( "firstName" ).eq( "John" ) )
.getResultList();
assertEquals(2, customers.size());
assertEquals( "Doe", customers.get( 0 ).getLastName() );
assertEquals( "Doe Jr.", customers.get( 1 ).getLastName() );
And, to select only entities whose relationships are related to a given entity, you can use either the target entity or its identifier.
Example 679. Getting the Customer
entities whose address
attribute matches the given entity reference
Address address = entityManager.getReference( Address.class, 1L );
List<Customer> customers = AuditReaderFactory
.get( entityManager )
.createQuery()
.forRevisionsOfEntity( Customer.class, true, true )
.add( AuditEntity.property( "address" ).eq( address ) )
.getResultList();
assertEquals(2, customers.size());
select
c.id as id1_3_,
c.REV as REV2_3_,
c.REVTYPE as REVTYPE3_3_,
c.REVEND as REVEND4_3_,
c.created_on as created_5_3_,
c.firstName as firstNam6_3_,
c.lastName as lastName7_3_,
c.address_id as address_8_3_
from
Customer_AUD c
where
c.address_id = ?
order by
c.REV asc
-- binding parameter [1] as [BIGINT] - [1]
The same SQL is generated even if we provide the identifier instead of the target entity reference.
Example 680. Getting the Customer
entities whose address
identifier matches the given entity identifier
List<Customer> customers = AuditReaderFactory
.get( entityManager )
.createQuery()
.forRevisionsOfEntity( Customer.class, true, true )
.add( AuditEntity.relatedId( "address" ).eq( 1L ) )
.getResultList();
assertEquals(2, customers.size());
Apart from strict equality matching, you can also use an IN
clause to provide multiple entity identifiers:
Example 681. Getting the Customer
entities whose address
identifier matches one of the given entity identifiers
List<Customer> customers = AuditReaderFactory
.get( entityManager )
.createQuery()
.forRevisionsOfEntity( Customer.class, true, true )
.add( AuditEntity.relatedId( "address" ).in( new Object[] { 1L, 2L } ) )
.getResultList();
assertEquals(2, customers.size());
select
c.id as id1_3_,
c.REV as REV2_3_,
c.REVTYPE as REVTYPE3_3_,
c.REVEND as REVEND4_3_,
c.created_on as created_5_3_,
c.firstName as firstNam6_3_,
c.lastName as lastName7_3_,
c.address_id as address_8_3_
from
Customer_AUD c
where
c.address_id in (
? , ?
)
order by
c.REV asc
-- binding parameter [1] as [BIGINT] - [1]
-- binding parameter [2] as [BIGINT] - [2]
You can limit the number of results, order them, and set aggregations and projections (except grouping) in the usual way. When your query is complete, you can obtain the results by calling the getSingleResult()
or getResultList()
methods.
A full query, can look for example like this:
Example 682. Getting the Customer
entities using filtering and pagination
List<Customer> customers = AuditReaderFactory
.get( entityManager )
.createQuery()
.forRevisionsOfEntity( Customer.class, true, true )
.addOrder( AuditEntity.property( "lastName" ).desc() )
.add( AuditEntity.relatedId( "address" ).eq( 1L ) )
.setFirstResult( 1 )
.setMaxResults( 2 )
.getResultList();
assertEquals(1, customers.size());
select
c.id as id1_3_,
c.REV as REV2_3_,
c.REVTYPE as REVTYPE3_3_,
c.REVEND as REVEND4_3_,
c.created_on as created_5_3_,
c.firstName as firstNam6_3_,
c.lastName as lastName7_3_,
c.address_id as address_8_3_
from
Customer_AUD c
where
c.address_id = ?
order by
c.lastName desc
limit ?
offset ?
21.12. Querying for revisions, at which entities of a given class changed
The entry point for this type of queries is:
AuditQuery query = AuditReaderFactory.get( entityManager )
.createQuery()
.forRevisionsOfEntity( Customer.class, false, true );
You can add constraints to this query in the same way as to the previous one.
There are some additional possibilities:
using
AuditEntity.revisionNumber()
you can specify constraints, projections and order on the revision number, in which the audited entity was modified.similarly, using
AuditEntity.revisionProperty( propertyName )
you can specify constraints, projections and order on a property of the revision entity, corresponding to the revision in which the audited entity was modified.AuditEntity.revisionType()
gives you access as above to the type of the revision (ADD
,MOD
,DEL
).
Using these methods, you can order the query results by revision number, set projection or constraint the revision number to be greater or less than a specified value, etc. For example, the following query will select the smallest revision number, at which entity of class MyEntity
with id entityId
has changed, after revision number 2:
Number revision = (Number) AuditReaderFactory
.get( entityManager )
.createQuery()
.forRevisionsOfEntity( Customer.class, false, true )
.addProjection( AuditEntity.revisionNumber().min() )
.add( AuditEntity.id().eq( 1L ) )
.add( AuditEntity.revisionNumber().gt( 2 ) )
.getSingleResult();
The second additional feature you can use in queries for revisions is the ability to maximize/minimize a property.
For example, if you want to select the smallest possible revision at which the value of the createdOn
attribute was larger then a given value, you can run the following query:
Number revision = (Number) AuditReaderFactory
.get( entityManager )
.createQuery()
.forRevisionsOfEntity( Customer.class, false, true )
.addProjection( AuditEntity.revisionNumber().min() )
.add( AuditEntity.id().eq( 1L ) )
.add(
AuditEntity.property( "createdOn" )
.minimize()
.add( AuditEntity.property( "createdOn" )
.ge(
Timestamp.from(
LocalDateTime.now()
.minusDays( 1 )
.toInstant( ZoneOffset.UTC )
)
)
)
)
.getSingleResult();
The minimize()
and maximize()
methods return a criterion, to which you can add constraints, which must be met by the entities with the maximized/minimized properties.
You probably also noticed that there are two boolean parameters, passed when creating the query.
selectEntitiesOnly
The first parameter is only valid when you don’t set an explicit projection.
If true, the result of the query will be a list of entities (which changed at revisions satisfying the specified constraints).
If false, the result will be a list of three element arrays:
the first element will be the changed entity instance.
the second will be an entity containing revision data (if no custom entity is used, this will be an instance of
DefaultRevisionEntity
).the third will be the type of the revision (one of the values of the
RevisionType
enumeration:ADD
,MOD
,DEL
).
selectDeletedEntities
The second parameter specifies if revisions, in which the entity was deleted should be included in the results.
If yes, such entities will have the revision type DEL
and all attributes, except the id
, will be set to null
.
Another useful feature is AggregatedAuditExpression#computeAggregationInInstanceContext()
. This can be used to create an aggregate query based on the entity instance primary key.
For example, if you wanted to locate all customers but only wanted to retrieve the instances with the maximum revision number, you would use the following query:
List<Customer> results = AuditReaderFactory
.get( entityManager )
.createQuery()
.forRevisionsOfEntity( Customer.class, true, false )
.add( AuditEntity.revisionNumber().maximize().computeAggregationInInstanceContext() )
.getResultList();
In other words, the result set would contain a list of Customer
instances, one per primary key. Each instance would hold the audited property data at the maximum revision number for each Customer
primary key.
21.13. Querying for entity revisions that modified a given property
For the two types of queries described above it’s possible to use special Audit
criteria called hasChanged()
and hasNotChanged()
that make use of the functionality described in Tracking entity changes at the property level.
Let’s have a look at various queries that can benefit from these two criteria.
First, you must make sure that your entity can track modification flags:
Example 683. Valid only when audit logging tracks entity attribute modification flags
@Audited( withModifiedFlag = true )
The following query will return all revisions of the Customer
entity with the given id
, for which the lastName
property has changed.
Example 684. Getting all Customer
revisions for which the lastName
attribute has changed
List<Customer> customers = AuditReaderFactory
.get( entityManager )
.createQuery()
.forRevisionsOfEntity( Customer.class, false, true )
.add( AuditEntity.id().eq( 1L ) )
.add( AuditEntity.property( "lastName" ).hasChanged() )
.getResultList();
select
c.id as id1_3_0_,
c.REV as REV2_3_0_,
defaultrev1_.REV as REV1_4_1_,
c.REVTYPE as REVTYPE3_3_0_,
c.REVEND as REVEND4_3_0_,
c.created_on as created_5_3_0_,
c.createdOn_MOD as createdO6_3_0_,
c.firstName as firstNam7_3_0_,
c.firstName_MOD as firstNam8_3_0_,
c.lastName as lastName9_3_0_,
c.lastName_MOD as lastNam10_3_0_,
c.address_id as address11_3_0_,
c.address_MOD as address12_3_0_,
defaultrev1_.REVTSTMP as REVTSTMP2_4_1_
from
Customer_AUD c cross
join
REVINFO defaultrev1_
where
c.id = ?
and c.lastName_MOD = ?
and c.REV=defaultrev1_.REV
order by
c.REV asc
-- binding parameter [1] as [BIGINT] - [1]
-- binding parameter [2] as [BOOLEAN] - [true]
Using this query we won’t get all other revisions in which lastName
wasn’t touched. From the SQL query you can see that the lastName_MOD
column is being used in the WHERE clause, hence the aforementioned requirement for tracking modification flags.
Of course, nothing prevents users from combining hasChanged
condition with some additional criteria.
Example 685. Getting all Customer
revisions for which the lastName
attribute has changed and the firstName
attribute has not changed
List<Customer> customers = AuditReaderFactory
.get( entityManager )
.createQuery()
.forRevisionsOfEntity( Customer.class, false, true )
.add( AuditEntity.id().eq( 1L ) )
.add( AuditEntity.property( "lastName" ).hasChanged() )
.add( AuditEntity.property( "firstName" ).hasNotChanged() )
.getResultList();
select
c.id as id1_3_0_,
c.REV as REV2_3_0_,
defaultrev1_.REV as REV1_4_1_,
c.REVTYPE as REVTYPE3_3_0_,
c.REVEND as REVEND4_3_0_,
c.created_on as created_5_3_0_,
c.createdOn_MOD as createdO6_3_0_,
c.firstName as firstNam7_3_0_,
c.firstName_MOD as firstNam8_3_0_,
c.lastName as lastName9_3_0_,
c.lastName_MOD as lastNam10_3_0_,
c.address_id as address11_3_0_,
c.address_MOD as address12_3_0_,
defaultrev1_.REVTSTMP as REVTSTMP2_4_1_
from
Customer_AUD c cross
join
REVINFO defaultrev1_
where
c.id=?
and c.lastName_MOD=?
and c.firstName_MOD=?
and c.REV=defaultrev1_.REV
order by
c.REV asc
-- binding parameter [1] as [BIGINT] - [1]
-- binding parameter [2] as [BOOLEAN] - [true]
-- binding parameter [3] as [BOOLEAN] - [false]
To get the Customer
entities changed at a given revisionNumber
with lastName
modified and firstName
untouched, we have to use the forEntitiesModifiedAtRevision
query:
Example 686. Getting the Customer
entity for a given revision if the lastName
attribute has changed and the firstName
attribute has not changed
Customer customer = (Customer) AuditReaderFactory
.get( entityManager )
.createQuery()
.forEntitiesModifiedAtRevision( Customer.class, 2 )
.add( AuditEntity.id().eq( 1L ) )
.add( AuditEntity.property( "lastName" ).hasChanged() )
.add( AuditEntity.property( "firstName" ).hasNotChanged() )
.getSingleResult();
select
c.id as id1_3_,
c.REV as REV2_3_,
c.REVTYPE as REVTYPE3_3_,
c.REVEND as REVEND4_3_,
c.created_on as created_5_3_,
c.createdOn_MOD as createdO6_3_,
c.firstName as firstNam7_3_,
c.firstName_MOD as firstNam8_3_,
c.lastName as lastName9_3_,
c.lastName_MOD as lastNam10_3_,
c.address_id as address11_3_,
c.address_MOD as address12_3_
from
Customer_AUD c
where
c.REV=?
and c.id=?
and c.lastName_MOD=?
and c.firstName_MOD=?
-- binding parameter [1] as [INTEGER] - [2]
-- binding parameter [2] as [BIGINT] - [1]
-- binding parameter [3] as [BOOLEAN] - [true]
-- binding parameter [4] as [BOOLEAN] - [false]
21.14. Querying for revisions of entity including property names that were modified
This feature described here is still considered experimental. It is subject to change in future releases based on user feedback to improve its usefulness. |
Sometimes it may be useful to query entity revisions and also determine all the properties of that revision which were modified without having to issue multiple queries using hasChanged()
and hasNotChanged()
criteria.
You can now obtain this information easily by using the following query:
Example 687. Querying entity revisions including property names modified.
List results = AuditReaderFactory.get( entityManager )
.createQuery()
.forRevisionsOfEntityWithChanges( Customer.class, false )
.add( AuditEntity.id().eq( 1L ) )
.getResultList();
for ( Object entry : results ) {
final Object[] array = (Object[]) entry;
final Set<String> propertiesChanged = (Set<String>) array[3];
for ( String propertyName : propertiesChanged ) {
/* Do something useful with the modified property `propertyName` */
}
}
21.15. Querying for entity types modified in a given revision
The methods described below can be used only when the default mechanism of tracking changed entity types is enabled (see Tracking entity names modified during revisions). |
This basic query allows retrieving entity names and corresponding Java classes changed in a specified revision:
Example 688. Retrieving entity names and corresponding Java classes changed in a specified revision
assertEquals(
"org.hibernate.userguide.envers.EntityTypeChangeAuditTest$Customer",
AuditReaderFactory
.get( entityManager )
.getCrossTypeRevisionChangesReader()
.findEntityTypes( 1 )
.iterator().next()
.getFirst()
);
assertEquals(
"org.hibernate.userguide.envers.EntityTypeChangeAuditTest$ApplicationCustomer",
AuditReaderFactory
.get( entityManager )
.getCrossTypeRevisionChangesReader()
.findEntityTypes( 2 )
.iterator().next()
.getFirst()
);
Other queries (also accessible from org.hibernate.envers.CrossTypeRevisionChangesReader
):
List<Object> findEntities(Number)
Returns snapshots of all audited entities changed (added, updated and removed) in a given revision. Executes N + 1
SQL queries, where N
is a number of different entity classes modified within specified revision.
List<Object> findEntities(Number, RevisionType)
Returns snapshots of all audited entities changed (added, updated or removed) in a given revision filtered by modification type. Executes N + 1
SQL queries, where N
is a number of different entity classes modified within specified revision.
Map<RevisionType, List<Object>> findEntitiesGroupByRevisionType(Number)
Returns a map containing lists of entity snapshots grouped by modification operation (e.g. addition, update and removal). Executes 3N + 1
SQL queries, where N
is a number of different entity classes modified within specified revision.
21.16. Querying for entities using entity relation joins
Relation join queries are considered experimental and may change in future releases. |
Audit queries support the ability to apply constraints, projections, and sort operations based on entity relations. In order to traverse entity relations through an audit query, you must use the relation traversal API with a join type.
Relation joins can be applied to |
The basis for creating an entity relation join query is as follows:
Example 689. INNER JOIN entity audit query
AuditQuery innerJoinAuditQuery = AuditReaderFactory
.get( entityManager )
.createQuery()
.forEntitiesAtRevision( Customer.class, 1 )
.traverseRelation( "address", JoinType.INNER );
Example 690. LEFT JOIN entity audit query
AuditQuery innerJoinAuditQuery = AuditReaderFactory
.get( entityManager )
.createQuery()
.forEntitiesAtRevision( Customer.class, 1 )
.traverseRelation( "address", JoinType.LEFT );
Like any other query, constraints may be added to restrict the results.
For example, to find all Customer
entities at a given revision whose addresses are in România
, you can use the following query:
Example 691. Filtering the join relation with a WHERE clause predicate
List<Customer> customers = AuditReaderFactory
.get( entityManager )
.createQuery()
.forEntitiesAtRevision( Customer.class, 1 )
.traverseRelation( "address", JoinType.INNER )
.add( AuditEntity.property( "country" ).eq( "România" ) )
.getResultList();
select
c.id as id1_3_,
c.REV as REV2_3_,
c.REVTYPE as REVTYPE3_3_,
c.REVEND as REVEND4_3_,
c.created_on as created_5_3_,
c.firstName as firstNam6_3_,
c.lastName as lastName7_3_,
c.address_id as address_8_3_
from
Customer_AUD c
inner join
Address_AUD a
on (
c.address_id=a.id
or (
c.address_id is null
)
and (
a.id is null
)
)
where
c.REV<=?
and c.REVTYPE<>?
and (
c.REVEND>?
or c.REVEND is null
)
and a.REV<=?
and a.country=?
and (
a.REVEND>?
or a.REVEND is null
)
-- binding parameter [1] as [INTEGER] - [1]
-- binding parameter [2] as [INTEGER] - [2]
-- binding parameter [3] as [INTEGER] - [1]
-- binding parameter [4] as [INTEGER] - [1]
-- binding parameter [5] as [VARCHAR] - [România]
-- binding parameter [6] as [INTEGER] - [1]
It is also possible to traverse beyond the first relation in an entity graph.
For example, to find all Customer
entities at a given revision with the country attribute of the address property being România
:
Example 692. Filtering a nested join relation with a WHERE clause predicate
List<Customer> customers = AuditReaderFactory
.get( entityManager )
.createQuery()
.forEntitiesAtRevision( Customer.class, 1 )
.traverseRelation( "address", JoinType.INNER )
.traverseRelation( "country", JoinType.INNER )
.add( AuditEntity.property( "name" ).eq( "România" ) )
.getResultList();
assertEquals( 1, customers.size() );
select
cu.id as id1_5_,
cu.REV as REV2_5_,
cu.REVTYPE as REVTYPE3_5_,
cu.REVEND as REVEND4_5_,
cu.created_on as created_5_5_,
cu.firstName as firstNam6_5_,
cu.lastName as lastName7_5_,
cu.address_id as address_8_5_
from
Customer_AUD cu
inner join
Address_AUD a
on (
cu.address_id=a.id
or (
cu.address_id is null
)
and (
a.id is null
)
)
inner join
Country_AUD co
on (
a.country_id=co.id
or (
a.country_id is null
)
and (
co.id is null
)
)
where
cu.REV<=?
and cu.REVTYPE<>?
and (
cu.REVEND>?
or cu.REVEND is null
)
and a.REV<=?
and (
a.REVEND>?
or a.REVEND is null
)
and co.REV<=?
and co.name=?
and (
co.REVEND>?
or co.REVEND is null
)
-- binding parameter [1] as [INTEGER] - [1]
-- binding parameter [2] as [INTEGER] - [2]
-- binding parameter [3] as [INTEGER] - [1]
-- binding parameter [4] as [INTEGER] - [1]
-- binding parameter [5] as [INTEGER] - [1]
-- binding parameter [6] as [INTEGER] - [1]
-- binding parameter [7] as [VARCHAR] - [România]
-- binding parameter [8] as [INTEGER] - [1]
Constraints may also be added to the properties of nested joined relations, such as testing for null
.
For example, the following query illustrates how to find all Customer
entities at a given revision having the address
in Cluj-Napoca
or the address
does not have any country entity reference:
Example 693. Filtering a join relation using multiple predicates
List<Customer> customers = AuditReaderFactory
.get( entityManager )
.createQuery()
.forEntitiesAtRevision( Customer.class, 1 )
.traverseRelation( "address", JoinType.LEFT, "a" )
.add(
AuditEntity.or(
AuditEntity.property( "a", "city" ).eq( "Cluj-Napoca" ),
AuditEntity.relatedId( "country" ).eq( null )
)
)
.getResultList();
select
c.id as id1_5_,
c.REV as REV2_5_,
c.REVTYPE as REVTYPE3_5_,
c.REVEND as REVEND4_5_,
c.created_on as created_5_5_,
c.firstName as firstNam6_5_,
c.lastName as lastName7_5_,
c.address_id as address_8_5_
from
Customer_AUD c
left outer join
Address_AUD a
on (
c.address_id=a.id
or (
c.address_id is null
)
and (
a.id is null
)
)
where
c.REV<=?
and c.REVTYPE<>?
and (
c.REVEND>?
or c.REVEND is null
)
and (
a.REV is null
or a.REV<=?
and (
a.REVEND>?
or a.REVEND is null
)
)
and (
a.city=?
or a.country_id is null
)
-- binding parameter [1] as [INTEGER] - [1]
-- binding parameter [2] as [INTEGER] - [2]
-- binding parameter [3] as [INTEGER] - [1]
-- binding parameter [4] as [INTEGER] - [1]
-- binding parameter [5] as [INTEGER] - [1]
-- binding parameter [6] as [VARCHAR] - [Cluj-Napoca]
Queries can use the |
Disjunction criterion may also be applied to relation join queries.
For example, the following query will find all Customer
entities at a given revision where the country name is România
or that the Customer
lives in Cluj-Napoca
:
Example 694. Filtering a nested join relation using multiple predicates
List<Customer> customers = AuditReaderFactory
.get( entityManager )
.createQuery()
.forEntitiesAtRevision( Customer.class, 1 )
.traverseRelation( "address", JoinType.INNER, "a" )
.traverseRelation( "country", JoinType.INNER, "cn" )
.up()
.up()
.add(
AuditEntity.disjunction()
.add( AuditEntity.property( "a", "city" ).eq( "Cluj-Napoca" ) )
.add( AuditEntity.property( "cn", "name" ).eq( "România" ) )
)
.addOrder( AuditEntity.property( "createdOn" ).asc() )
.getResultList();
select
cu.id as id1_5_,
cu.REV as REV2_5_,
cu.REVTYPE as REVTYPE3_5_,
cu.REVEND as REVEND4_5_,
cu.created_on as created_5_5_,
cu.firstName as firstNam6_5_,
cu.lastName as lastName7_5_,
cu.address_id as address_8_5_
from
Customer_AUD cu
inner join
Address_AUD a
on (
cu.address_id=a.id
or (
cu.address_id is null
)
and (
a.id is null
)
)
inner join
Country_AUD co
on (
a.country_id=co.id
or (
a.country_id is null
)
and (
co.id is null
)
)
where
cu.REV<=?
and cu.REVTYPE<>?
and (
cu.REVEND>?
or cu.REVEND is null
)
and (
a.city=?
or co.name=?
)
and a.REV<=?
and (
a.REVEND>?
or a.REVEND is null
)
and co.REV<=?
and (
co.REVEND>?
or co.REVEND is null
)
order by
cu.created_on asc
-- binding parameter [1] as [INTEGER] - [1]
-- binding parameter [2] as [INTEGER] - [2]
-- binding parameter [3] as [INTEGER] - [1]
-- binding parameter [4] as [VARCHAR] - [Cluj-Napoca]
-- binding parameter [5] as [VARCHAR] - [România]
-- binding parameter [6] as [INTEGER] - [1]
-- binding parameter [7] as [INTEGER] - [1]
-- binding parameter [8] as [INTEGER] - [1]
-- binding parameter [9] as [INTEGER] - [1]
Lastly, this example illustrates how related entity properties can be compared in a single constraint.
Assuming the Customer
and the Address
were previously changed as follows:
Example 695. Changing the Address
to match the Country
name
Customer customer = entityManager.createQuery(
"select c " +
"from Customer c " +
"join fetch c.address a " +
"join fetch a.country " +
"where c.id = :id", Customer.class )
.setParameter( "id", 1L )
.getSingleResult();
customer.setLastName( "Doe Sr." );
customer.getAddress().setCity(
customer.getAddress().getCountry().getName()
);
The following query shows how to find the Customer
entities where the city
property of the address
attribute equals the name
of the associated country
attribute.
Example 696. Filtering a nested join relation using multiple predicates
List<Number> revisions = AuditReaderFactory.get( entityManager ).getRevisions(
Customer.class,
1L
);
List<Customer> customers = AuditReaderFactory
.get( entityManager )
.createQuery()
.forEntitiesAtRevision( Customer.class, revisions.get( revisions.size() - 1 ) )
.traverseRelation( "address", JoinType.INNER, "a" )
.traverseRelation( "country", JoinType.INNER, "cn" )
.up()
.up()
.add( AuditEntity.property( "a", "city" ).eqProperty( "cn", "name" ) )
.getResultList();
select
cu.id as id1_5_,
cu.REV as REV2_5_,
cu.REVTYPE as REVTYPE3_5_,
cu.REVEND as REVEND4_5_,
cu.created_on as created_5_5_,
cu.firstName as firstNam6_5_,
cu.lastName as lastName7_5_,
cu.address_id as address_8_5_
from
Customer_AUD cu
inner join
Address_AUD a
on (
cu.address_id=a.id
or (
cu.address_id is null
)
and (
a.id is null
)
)
inner join
Country_AUD cr
on (
a.country_id=cr.id
or (
a.country_id is null
)
and (
cr.id is null
)
)
where
cu.REV<=?
and cu.REVTYPE<>?
and a.city=cr.name
and (
cu.REVEND>?
or cu.REVEND is null
)
and a.REV<=?
and (
a.REVEND>?
or a.REVEND is null
)
and cr.REV<=?
and (
cr.REVEND>?
or cr.REVEND is null
)
-- binding parameter [1] as [INTEGER] - [2]
-- binding parameter [2] as [INTEGER] - [2]
-- binding parameter [3] as [INTEGER] - [2]
-- binding parameter [4] as [INTEGER] - [2]
-- binding parameter [5] as [INTEGER] - [2]
-- binding parameter [6] as [INTEGER] - [2]
-- binding parameter [7] as [INTEGER] - [2]
21.17. Querying for revision information without loading entities
Sometimes, it may be useful to load information about revisions to find out who performed specific revisions or to know what entity names were modified but the change log about the related audited entities isn’t needed. This API allows an efficient way to get the revision information entity log without instantiating the actual entities themselves.
Here is a simple example:
AuditQuery query = getAuditReader().createQuery()
.forRevisionsOfEntity( DefaultRevisionEntity.class, true )
.add( AuditEntity.revisionNumber().between( 1, 25 ) );
This query will return all revision information entities for revisions between 1 and 25 including those which are related to deletions. If deletions are not of interest, you would pass false
as the second argument.
Note that this query uses the DefaultRevisionEntity
class type. The class provided will vary depending on the configuration properties used to configure Envers or if you supply your own revision entity. Typically users who will use this API will likely be providing a custom revision entity implementation to obtain custom information being maintained per revision.
21.18. Conditional auditing
Envers persists audit data in reaction to various Hibernate events (e.g. post update
, post insert
, and so on), using a series of event listeners from the org.hibernate.envers.event.spi
package. By default, if the Envers jar is in the classpath, the event listeners are auto-registered with Hibernate.
Conditional auditing can be implemented by overriding some of the Envers event listeners. To use customized Envers event listeners, the following steps are needed:
Turn off automatic Envers event listeners registration by setting the
hibernate.envers.autoRegisterListeners
Hibernate property tofalse
.Create subclasses for appropriate event listeners. For example, if you want to conditionally audit entity insertions, extend the
org.hibernate.envers.event.spi.EnversPostInsertEventListenerImpl
class. Place the conditional-auditing logic in the subclasses, call the super method if auditing should be performed.Create your own implementation of
org.hibernate.integrator.spi.Integrator
, similar toorg.hibernate.envers.boot.internal.EnversIntegrator
. Use your event listener classes instead of the default ones.For the integrator to be automatically used when Hibernate starts up, you will need to add a
META-INF/services/org.hibernate.integrator.spi.Integrator
file to your jar. The file should contain the fully qualified name of the class implementing the interface.
The use of |
21.19. Understanding the Envers Schema
For each audited entity (that is, for each entity containing at least one audited field), an audit table is created. By default, the audit table’s name is created by adding an “_AUD” suffix to the original table name, but this can be overridden by specifying a different suffix/prefix in the configuration properties or per-entity using the @org.hibernate.envers.AuditTable
annotation.
The audit table contains the following columns:
id
id
of the original entity (this can be more then one column in the case of composite primary keys).
revision number
an integer, which matches to the revision number in the revision entity table.
revision type
The org.hibernate.envers.RevisionType
enumeration ordinal stating if the change represents an INSERT, UPDATE or DELETE.
audited fields
properties from the original entity being audited.
The primary key of the audit table is the combination of the original id of the entity and the revision number, so there can be at most one historic entry for a given entity instance at a given revision.
The current entity data is stored in the original table and in the audit table. This is a duplication of data, however, as this solution makes the query system much more powerful, and as memory is cheap, hopefully, this won’t be a major drawback for the users.
A row in the audit table with entity id ID
, revision N
, and data D
means: entity with id ID
has data D
from revision N
upwards. Hence, if we want to find an entity at revision M
, we have to search for a row in the audit table, which has the revision number smaller or equal to M
, but as large as possible. If no such row is found, or a row with a “deleted” marker is found, it means that the entity didn’t exist at that revision.
The “revision type” field can currently have three values: 0
, 1
and 2
, which means ADD
, MOD
, and DEL
, respectively. A row with a revision of type DEL
will only contain the id of the entity and no data (all fields NULL
), as it only serves as a marker saying “this entity was deleted at that revision”.
Additionally, there is a revision entity table which contains the information about the global revision. By default, the generated table is named REVINFO
and contains just two columns: ID
and TIMESTAMP
. A row is inserted into this table on each new revision, that is, on each commit of a transaction, which changes audited data. The name of this table can be configured, the name of its columns as well as adding additional columns can be achieved as discussed in Revision Log.
While global revisions are a good way to provide correct auditing of relations, some people have pointed out that this may be a bottleneck in systems where data is very often modified. One viable solution is to introduce an option to have an entity “locally revisioned”, that is revisions would be created for it independently. This would not enable correct versioning of relations, but it would work without the Another possibility is to introduce a notion of “revisioning groups”, which would group entities sharing the same revision numbering. Each such group would have to consist of one or more strongly connected components belonging to the entity graph induced by relations between entities. Your opinions on the subject are very welcome on the forum. |
21.20. Generating Envers schema with Hibernate hbm2ddl tool
If you would like to generate the database schema file with Hibernate, you simply need to use the hbm2ddl too.
This task will generate the definitions of all entities, both of those which are audited by Envers and those which are not.
See the Schema generation chapter for more info.
For the following entities, Hibernate is going to generate the following database schema:
Example 697. Filtering a nested join relation using multiple predicates
@Audited
@Entity(name = "Customer")
public static class Customer {
@Id
private Long id;
private String firstName;
private String lastName;
@Temporal( TemporalType.TIMESTAMP )
@Column(name = "created_on")
@CreationTimestamp
private Date createdOn;
@ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
private Address address;
//Getters and setters omitted for brevity
}
@Audited
@Entity(name = "Address")
public static class Address {
@Id
private Long id;
@ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
private Country country;
private String city;
private String street;
private String streetNumber;
//Getters and setters omitted for brevity
}
@Audited
@Entity(name = "Country")
public static class Country {
@Id
private Long id;
private String name;
//Getters and setters omitted for brevity
}
create table Address (
id bigint not null,
city varchar(255),
street varchar(255),
streetNumber varchar(255),
country_id bigint,
primary key (id)
)
create table Address_AUD (
id bigint not null,
REV integer not null,
REVTYPE tinyint,
REVEND integer,
city varchar(255),
street varchar(255),
streetNumber varchar(255),
country_id bigint,
primary key (id, REV)
)
create table Country (
id bigint not null,
name varchar(255),
primary key (id)
)
create table Country_AUD (
id bigint not null,
REV integer not null,
REVTYPE tinyint,
REVEND integer,
name varchar(255),
primary key (id, REV)
)
create table Customer (
id bigint not null,
created_on timestamp,
firstName varchar(255),
lastName varchar(255),
address_id bigint,
primary key (id)
)
create table Customer_AUD (
id bigint not null,
REV integer not null,
REVTYPE tinyint,
REVEND integer,
created_on timestamp,
firstName varchar(255),
lastName varchar(255),
address_id bigint,
primary key (id, REV)
)
create table REVINFO (
REV integer generated by default as identity,
REVTSTMP bigint,
primary key (REV)
)
alter table Address
add constraint FKpr4rl83u5fv832kdihl6w3kii
foreign key (country_id)
references Country
alter table Address_AUD
add constraint FKgwp5sek4pjb4awy66sp184hrv
foreign key (REV)
references REVINFO
alter table Address_AUD
add constraint FK52pqkpismfxg2b9tmwtncnk0d
foreign key (REVEND)
references REVINFO
alter table Country_AUD
add constraint FKrix4g8hm9ui6sut5sy86ujggr
foreign key (REV)
references REVINFO
alter table Country_AUD
add constraint FKpjeqmdccv22y1lbtswjb84ghi
foreign key (REVEND)
references REVINFO
alter table Customer
add constraint FKfok4ytcqy7lovuiilldbebpd9
foreign key (address_id)
references Address
alter table Customer_AUD
add constraint FK5ecvi1a0ykunrriib7j28vpdj
foreign key (REV)
references REVINFO
alter table Customer_AUD
add constraint FKqd4fy7ww1yy95wi4wtaonre3f
foreign key (REVEND)
references REVINFO
21.21. Mapping exceptions
21.21.1. What isn’t and will not be supported
Bags are not supported because they can contain non-unique elements. Persisting a bag of `String`s violates the relational database principle that each table is a set of tuples.
In case of bags, however (which require a join table), if there is a duplicate element, the two tuples corresponding to the elements will be the same. Although Hibernate allows this, Envers (or more precisely the database connector) will throw an exception when trying to persist two identical elements because of a unique constraint violation.
There are at least two ways out if you need bag semantics:
use an indexed collection, with the
@javax.persistence.OrderColumn
annotation.provide a unique id for your elements with the
@CollectionId
annotation.
21.21.2. What isn’t and will be supported
- Bag style collections with a
@CollectionId
identifier column (see HHH-3950).
21.22. @OneToMany
with @JoinColumn
When a collection is mapped using these two annotations, Hibernate doesn’t generate a join table. Envers, however, has to do this so that when you read the revisions in which the related entity has changed, you don’t get false results.
To be able to name the additional join table, there is a special annotation: @AuditJoinTable
, which has similar semantics to JPA @JoinTable
.
One special case is to have relations mapped with @OneToMany
with @JoinColumn
on the one side, and @ManyToOne
and @JoinColumn( insertable = false, updatable = false
) on the many side. Such relations are, in fact, bidirectional, but the owning side is the collection.
To properly audit such relations with Envers, you can use the @AuditMappedBy
annotation. It enables you to specify the reverse property (using the mappedBy
element). In case of indexed collections, the index column must also be mapped in the referenced entity (using @Column( insertable = false, updatable = false )
, and specified using positionMappedBy
. This annotation will affect only the way Envers works. Please note that the annotation is experimental and may change in the future.
21.23. Advanced: Audit table partitioning
21.24. Benefits of audit table partitioning
Because audit tables tend to grow indefinitely, they can quickly become really large. When the audit tables have grown to a certain limit (varying per RDBMS and/or operating system) it makes sense to start using table partitioning. SQL table partitioning offers a lot of advantages including, but certainly not limited to:
Improved query performance by selectively moving rows to various partitions (or even purging old rows).
Faster data loads, index creation, etc.
21.25. Suitable columns for audit table partitioning
Generally, SQL tables must be partitioned on a column that exists within the table. As a rule, it makes sense to use either the end revision or the end revision timestamp column for partitioning of audit tables.
End revision information is not available for the default Therefore the following Envers configuration options are required:
Optionally, you can also override the default values using following properties:
For more information, see Configuration Properties. |
The reason why the end revision information should be used for audit table partitioning is based on the assumption that audit tables should be partitioned on an ‘increasing level of relevancy’, like so:
A couple of partitions with audit data that is not very (or no longer) relevant. This can be stored on slow media, and perhaps even be purged eventually.
Some partitions for audit data that is potentially relevant.
One partition for audit data that is most likely to be relevant. This should be stored on the fastest media, both for reading and writing.
21.26. Audit table partitioning example
In order to determine a suitable column for the ‘increasing level of relevancy’, consider a simplified example of a salary registration for an unnamed agency.
Currently, the salary table contains the following rows for a certain person X:
Year | Salary (USD) |
---|---|
2006 | 3300 |
2007 | 3500 |
2008 | 4000 |
2009 | 4500 |
The salary for the current fiscal year (2010) is unknown. The agency requires that all changes in registered salaries for a fiscal year are recorded (i.e., an audit trail). The rationale behind this is that decisions made at a certain date are based on the registered salary at that time. And at any time it must be possible to reproduce the reason why a certain decision was made at a certain date.
The following audit information is available, sorted in order of occurrence:
Year | Revision type | Revision timestamp | Salary (USD) | End revision timestamp |
---|---|---|---|---|
2006 | ADD | 2007-04-01 | 3300 | null |
2007 | ADD | 2008-04-01 | 35 | 2008-04-02 |
2007 | MOD | 2008-04-02 | 3500 | null |
2008 | ADD | 2009-04-01 | 3700 | 2009-07-01 |
2008 | MOD | 2009-07-01 | 4100 | 2010-02-01 |
2008 | MOD | 2010-02-01 | 4000 | null |
2009 | ADD | 2010-04-01 | 4500 | null |
21.27. Determining a suitable partitioning column
To partition this data, the level of relevancy must be defined. Consider the following:
For the fiscal year 2006, there is only one revision. It has the oldest revision timestamp of all audit rows, but should still be regarded as relevant because it’s the latest modification for this fiscal year in the salary table (its end revision timestamp is null).
Also, note that it would be very unfortunate if in 2011 there would be an update of the salary for the fiscal year 2006 (which is possible until at least 10 years after the fiscal year), and the audit information would have been moved to a slow disk (based on the age of the revision timestamp). Remember that, in this case, Envers will have to update the end revision timestamp of the most recent audit row.
There are two revisions in the salary of the fiscal year 2007 which both have nearly the same revision timestamp and a different end revision timestamp.
On first sight, it is evident that the first revision was a mistake and probably not relevant. The only relevant revision for 2007 is the one with end revision timestamp value of null.
Based on the above, it is evident that only the end revision timestamp is suitable for audit table partitioning. The revision timestamp is not suitable.
21.28. Determining a suitable partitioning scheme
A possible partitioning scheme for the salary table would be as follows:
end revision timestamp year = 2008
This partition contains audit data that is not very (or no longer) relevant.
end revision timestamp year = 2009
This partition contains audit data that is potentially relevant.
end revision timestamp year >= 2010 or null
This partition contains the most relevant audit data.
This partitioning scheme also covers the potential problem of the update of the end revision timestamp, which occurs if a row in the audited table is modified. Even though Envers will update the end revision timestamp of the audit row to the system date at the instant of modification, the audit row will remain in the same partition (the ‘extension bucket’).
And sometime in 2011, the last partition (or ‘extension bucket’) is split into two new partitions:
end revision timestamp year = 2010: This partition contains audit data that is potentially relevant (in 2011).
end revision timestamp year >= 2011 or null: This partition contains the most interesting audit data and is the new ‘extension bucket’.
21.29. Envers links
JIRA issue tracker (when adding issues concerning Envers, be sure to select the “envers” component!)