Privacy
The Policy
option in the schema allows configuring privacy policy for queries and mutations of entities in the database.
The main advantage of the privacy layer is that, you write the privacy policy once (in the schema), and it is always evaluated. No matter where queries and mutations are performed in your codebase, it will always go through the privacy layer.
In this tutorial, we will start by going over the basic terms we use in the framework, continue with a section for configuring the policy feature to your project, and finish with a few examples.
Basic Terms
Policy
The ent.Policy
interface contains two methods: EvalQuery
and EvalMutation
. The first defines the read-policy, and the second defines the write-policy. A policy contains zero or more privacy rules (see below). These rules are evaluated in the same order they are declared in the schema.
If all rules are evaluated without returning an error, the evaluation finishes successfully, and the executed operation gets access to the target nodes.
However, if one of the evaluated rules returns an error or a privacy.Deny
decision (see below), the executed operation returns an error, and it is cancelled.
Privacy Rules
Each policy (mutation or query) includes one or more privacy rules. The function signature for these rules is as follows:
// EvalQuery defines the a read-policy rule.
func(Policy) EvalQuery(context.Context, Query) error
// EvalMutation defines the a write-policy rule.
func(Policy) EvalMutation(context.Context, Mutation) error
Privacy Decisions
There are three types of decision that can help you control the privacy rules evaluation.
privacy.Allow
- If returned from a privacy rule, the evaluation stops (next rules will be skipped), and the executed operation (query or mutation) gets access to the target nodes.privacy.Deny
- If returned from a privacy rule, the evaluation stops (next rules will be skipped), and the executed operation is cancelled. This equivalent to returning any error.privacy.Skip
- Skip the current rule, and jump to the next privacy rule. This equivalent to returning anil
error.
Now that we’ve covered the basic terms, let’s start writing some code.
Configuration
In order to enable the privacy option in your code generation, enable the privacy
feature with one of two options:
- CLI
- Go
If you are using the default go generate config, add --feature privacy
option to the ent/generate.go
file as follows:
ent/generate.go
package ent
//go:generate go run -mod=mod entgo.io/ent/cmd/ent generate --feature privacy ./schema
It is recommended to add the schema/snapshot feature-flag along with the privacy
flag to enhance the development experience, for example:
//go:generate go run -mod=mod entgo.io/ent/cmd/ent generate --feature privacy,schema/snapshot ./schema
If you are using the configuration from the GraphQL documentation, add the feature flag as follows:
// +build ignore
package main
import (
"log"
"entgo.io/ent/entc"
"entgo.io/ent/entc/gen"
)
func main() {
opts := []entc.Option{
entc.FeatureNames("privacy"),
}
if err := entc.Generate("./schema", &gen.Config{}, opts...); err != nil {
log.Fatalf("running ent codegen: %v", err)
}
}
It is recommended to add the schema/snapshot feature-flag along with the privacy
flag to enhance the development experience, for example:
opts := []entc.Option{
- entc.FeatureNames("privacy"),
+ entc.FeatureNames("privacy", "schema/snapshot"),
}
Privacy Policy Registration
info
You should notice that similar to schema hooks, if you use the Policy
option in your schema, you MUST add the following import in the main package, because a circular import is possible between the schema package, and the generated ent package:
import _ "<project>/ent/runtime"
Examples
Admin Only
We start with a simple example of an application that lets any user read any data, and accepts mutations only from users with admin role. We will create 2 additional packages for the purpose of the examples:
rule
- for holding the different privacy rules in our schema.viewer
- for getting and setting the user/viewer who’s executing the operation. In this simple example, it can be either a normal user or an admin.
After running the code-generation (with the feature-flag for privacy), we add the Policy
method with 2 generated policy rules.
examples/privacyadmin/ent/schema/user.go
package schema
import (
"entgo.io/ent"
"entgo.io/ent/examples/privacyadmin/ent/privacy"
)
// User holds the schema definition for the User entity.
type User struct {
ent.Schema
}
// Policy defines the privacy policy of the User.
func (User) Policy() ent.Policy {
return privacy.Policy{
Mutation: privacy.MutationPolicy{
// Deny if not set otherwise.
privacy.AlwaysDenyRule(),
},
Query: privacy.QueryPolicy{
// Allow any viewer to read anything.
privacy.AlwaysAllowRule(),
},
}
}
We defined a policy that rejects any mutation and accepts any query. However, as mentioned above, in this example, we accept mutations only from viewers with admin role. Let’s create 2 privacy rules to enforce this:
examples/privacyadmin/rule/rule.go
package rule
import (
"context"
"entgo.io/ent/examples/privacyadmin/ent/privacy"
"entgo.io/ent/examples/privacyadmin/viewer"
)
// DenyIfNoViewer is a rule that returns Deny decision if the viewer is
// missing in the context.
func DenyIfNoViewer() privacy.QueryMutationRule {
return privacy.ContextQueryMutationRule(func(ctx context.Context) error {
view := viewer.FromContext(ctx)
if view == nil {
return privacy.Denyf("viewer-context is missing")
}
// Skip to the next privacy rule (equivalent to returning nil).
return privacy.Skip
})
}
// AllowIfAdmin is a rule that returns Allow decision if the viewer is admin.
func AllowIfAdmin() privacy.QueryMutationRule {
return privacy.ContextQueryMutationRule(func(ctx context.Context) error {
view := viewer.FromContext(ctx)
if view.Admin() {
return privacy.Allow
}
// Skip to the next privacy rule (equivalent to returning nil).
return privacy.Skip
})
}
As you can see, the first rule DenyIfNoViewer
, makes sure every operation has a viewer in its context, otherwise, the operation rejected. The second rule AllowIfAdmin
, accepts any operation from viewer with admin role. Let’s add them to the schema, and run the code-generation:
examples/privacyadmin/ent/schema/user.go
// Policy defines the privacy policy of the User.
func (User) Policy() ent.Policy {
return privacy.Policy{
Mutation: privacy.MutationPolicy{
rule.DenyIfNoViewer(),
rule.AllowIfAdmin(),
privacy.AlwaysDenyRule(),
},
Query: privacy.QueryPolicy{
privacy.AlwaysAllowRule(),
},
}
}
Since we define the DenyIfNoViewer
first, it will be executed before all other rules, and accessing the viewer.Viewer
object is safe in the AllowIfAdmin
rule.
After adding the rules above and running the code-generation, we expect the privacy-layer logic to be applied on ent.Client
operations.
examples/privacyadmin/example_test.go
func Do(ctx context.Context, client *ent.Client) error {
// Expect operation to fail, because viewer-context
// is missing (first mutation rule check).
if err := client.User.Create().Exec(ctx); !errors.Is(err, privacy.Deny) {
return fmt.Errorf("expect operation to fail, but got %w", err)
}
// Apply the same operation with "Admin" role.
admin := viewer.NewContext(ctx, viewer.UserViewer{Role: viewer.Admin})
if err := client.User.Create().Exec(admin); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("expect operation to pass, but got %w", err)
}
// Apply the same operation with "ViewOnly" role.
viewOnly := viewer.NewContext(ctx, viewer.UserViewer{Role: viewer.View})
if err := client.User.Create().Exec(viewOnly); !errors.Is(err, privacy.Deny) {
return fmt.Errorf("expect operation to fail, but got %w", err)
}
// Allow all viewers to query users.
for _, ctx := range []context.Context{ctx, viewOnly, admin} {
// Operation should pass for all viewers.
count := client.User.Query().CountX(ctx)
fmt.Println(count)
}
return nil
}
Decision Context
Sometimes, we want to bind a specific privacy decision to the context.Context
. In cases like this, we can use the privacy.DecisionContext
function to create a new context with a privacy decision attached to it.
examples/privacyadmin/example_test.go
func Do(ctx context.Context, client *ent.Client) error {
// Bind a privacy decision to the context (bypass all other rules).
allow := privacy.DecisionContext(ctx, privacy.Allow)
if err := client.User.Create().Exec(allow); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("expect operation to pass, but got %w", err)
}
return nil
}
The full example exists in GitHub.
Multi Tenancy
In this example, we’re going to create a schema with 3 entity types - Tenant
, User
and Group
. The helper packages viewer
and rule
(as mentioned above) also exist in this example to help us structure the application.
Let’s start building this application piece by piece. We begin by creating 3 different schemas (see the full code here), and since we want to share some logic between them, we create another mixed-in schema and add it to all other schemas as follows:
examples/privacytenant/ent/schema/mixin.go
// BaseMixin for all schemas in the graph.
type BaseMixin struct {
mixin.Schema
}
// Policy defines the privacy policy of the BaseMixin.
func (BaseMixin) Policy() ent.Policy {
return privacy.Policy{
Query: privacy.QueryPolicy{
// Deny any query operation in case
// there is no "viewer context".
rule.DenyIfNoViewer(),
// Allow admins to query any information.
rule.AllowIfAdmin(),
},
Mutation: privacy.MutationPolicy{
// Deny any mutation operation in case
// there is no "viewer context".
rule.DenyIfNoViewer(),
},
}
}
examples/privacytenant/ent/schema/tenant.go
// Mixin of the Tenant schema.
func (Tenant) Mixin() []ent.Mixin {
return []ent.Mixin{
BaseMixin{},
}
}
As explained in the first example, the DenyIfNoViewer
privacy rule, denies the operation if the context.Context
does not contain the viewer.Viewer
information.
Similar to the previous example, we want to add a constraint that only admin users can create tenants (and deny otherwise). We do it by copying the AllowIfAdmin
rule from above, and adding it to the Policy
of the Tenant
schema:
examples/privacytenant/ent/schema/tenant.go
// Policy defines the privacy policy of the User.
func (Tenant) Policy() ent.Policy {
return privacy.Policy{
Mutation: privacy.MutationPolicy{
// For Tenant type, we only allow admin users to mutate
// the tenant information and deny otherwise.
rule.AllowIfAdmin(),
privacy.AlwaysDenyRule(),
},
}
}
Then, we expect the following code to run successfully:
examples/privacytenant/example_test.go
func Example_CreateTenants(ctx context.Context, client *ent.Client) {
// Expect operation to fail in case viewer-context is missing.
// First mutation privacy policy rule defined in BaseMixin.
if err := client.Tenant.Create().Exec(ctx); !errors.Is(err, privacy.Deny) {
log.Fatal("expect tenant creation to fail, but got:", err)
}
// Expect operation to fail in case the ent.User in the viewer-context
// is not an admin user. Privacy policy defined in the Tenant schema.
viewCtx := viewer.NewContext(ctx, viewer.UserViewer{Role: viewer.View})
if err := client.Tenant.Create().Exec(viewCtx); !errors.Is(err, privacy.Deny) {
log.Fatal("expect tenant creation to fail, but got:", err)
}
// Operations should pass successfully as the user in the viewer-context
// is an admin user. First mutation privacy policy in Tenant schema.
adminCtx := viewer.NewContext(ctx, viewer.UserViewer{Role: viewer.Admin})
hub, err := client.Tenant.Create().SetName("GitHub").Save(adminCtx)
if err != nil {
log.Fatal("expect tenant creation to pass, but got:", err)
}
fmt.Println(hub)
lab, err := client.Tenant.Create().SetName("GitLab").Save(adminCtx)
if err != nil {
log.Fatal("expect tenant creation to pass, but got:", err)
}
fmt.Println(lab)
// Output:
// Tenant(id=1, name=GitHub)
// Tenant(id=2, name=GitLab)
}
We continue by adding the rest of the edges in our data-model (see image above), and since both User
and Group
have an edge to the Tenant
schema, we create a shared mixed-in schema named TenantMixin
for this:
examples/privacytenant/ent/schema/mixin.go
// TenantMixin for embedding the tenant info in different schemas.
type TenantMixin struct {
mixin.Schema
}
// Fields for all schemas that embed TenantMixin.
func (TenantMixin) Fields() []ent.Field {
return []ent.Field{
field.Int("tenant_id").
Immutable(),
}
}
// Edges for all schemas that embed TenantMixin.
func (TenantMixin) Edges() []ent.Edge {
return []ent.Edge{
edge.To("tenant", Tenant.Type).
Field("tenant_id").
Unique().
Required().
Immutable(),
}
}
Filter Rules
Next, we may want to enforce a rule that will limit viewers to only query groups and users that are connected to the tenant they belong to. For use cases like this, Ent has an additional type of privacy rule named Filter
. We can use Filter
rules to filter out entities based on the identity of the viewer. Unlike the rules we previously discussed, Filter
rules can limit the scope of the queries a viewer can make, in addition to returning privacy decisions.
Note
The privacy filtering option needs to be enabled using the entql feature-flag (see instructions above).
examples/privacytenant/rule/rule.go
// FilterTenantRule is a query/mutation rule that filters out entities that are not in the tenant.
func FilterTenantRule() privacy.QueryMutationRule {
// TenantsFilter is an interface to wrap WhereHasTenantWith()
// predicate that is used by both `Group` and `User` schemas.
type TenantsFilter interface {
WhereTenantID(entql.IntP)
}
return privacy.FilterFunc(func(ctx context.Context, f privacy.Filter) error {
view := viewer.FromContext(ctx)
tid, ok := view.Tenant()
if !ok {
return privacy.Denyf("missing tenant information in viewer")
}
tf, ok := f.(TenantsFilter)
if !ok {
return privacy.Denyf("unexpected filter type %T", f)
}
// Make sure that a tenant reads only entities that have an edge to it.
tf.WhereTenantID(entql.IntEQ(tid))
// Skip to the next privacy rule (equivalent to return nil).
return privacy.Skip
})
}
After creating the FilterTenantRule
privacy rule, we add it to the TenantMixin
to make sure all schemas that use this mixin, will also have this privacy rule.
examples/privacytenant/ent/schema/mixin.go
// Policy for all schemas that embed TenantMixin.
func (TenantMixin) Policy() ent.Policy {
return rule.FilterTenantRule()
}
Then, after running the code-generation, we expect the privacy-rules to take effect on the client operations.
examples/privacytenant/example_test.go
func Example_TenantView(ctx context.Context, client *ent.Client) {
// Operations should pass successfully as the user in the viewer-context
// is an admin user. First mutation privacy policy in Tenant schema.
adminCtx := viewer.NewContext(ctx, viewer.UserViewer{Role: viewer.Admin})
hub := client.Tenant.Create().SetName("GitHub").SaveX(adminCtx)
lab := client.Tenant.Create().SetName("GitLab").SaveX(adminCtx)
// Create 2 tenant-specific viewer contexts.
hubView := viewer.NewContext(ctx, viewer.UserViewer{T: hub})
labView := viewer.NewContext(ctx, viewer.UserViewer{T: lab})
// Create 2 users in each tenant.
hubUsers := client.User.CreateBulk(
client.User.Create().SetName("a8m").SetTenant(hub),
client.User.Create().SetName("nati").SetTenant(hub),
).SaveX(hubView)
fmt.Println(hubUsers)
labUsers := client.User.CreateBulk(
client.User.Create().SetName("foo").SetTenant(lab),
client.User.Create().SetName("bar").SetTenant(lab),
).SaveX(labView)
fmt.Println(labUsers)
// Query users should fail in case viewer-context is missing.
if _, err := client.User.Query().Count(ctx); !errors.Is(err, privacy.Deny) {
log.Fatal("expect user query to fail, but got:", err)
}
// Ensure each tenant can see only its users.
// First and only rule in TenantMixin.
fmt.Println(client.User.Query().Select(user.FieldName).StringsX(hubView))
fmt.Println(client.User.Query().CountX(hubView))
fmt.Println(client.User.Query().Select(user.FieldName).StringsX(labView))
fmt.Println(client.User.Query().CountX(labView))
// Expect admin users to see everything. First
// query privacy policy defined in BaseMixin.
fmt.Println(client.User.Query().CountX(adminCtx)) // 4
// Update operation with specific tenant-view should update
// only the tenant in the viewer-context.
client.User.Update().SetFoods([]string{"pizza"}).SaveX(hubView)
fmt.Println(client.User.Query().AllX(hubView))
fmt.Println(client.User.Query().AllX(labView))
// Delete operation with specific tenant-view should delete
// only the tenant in the viewer-context.
client.User.Delete().ExecX(labView)
fmt.Println(
client.User.Query().CountX(hubView), // 2
client.User.Query().CountX(labView), // 0
)
// DeleteOne with wrong viewer-context is nop.
client.User.DeleteOne(hubUsers[0]).ExecX(labView)
fmt.Println(client.User.Query().CountX(hubView)) // 2
// Unlike queries, admin users are not allowed to mutate tenant specific data.
if err := client.User.DeleteOne(hubUsers[0]).Exec(adminCtx); !errors.Is(err, privacy.Deny) {
log.Fatal("expect user deletion to fail, but got:", err)
}
// Output:
// [User(id=1, tenant_id=1, name=a8m, foods=[]) User(id=2, tenant_id=1, name=nati, foods=[])]
// [User(id=3, tenant_id=2, name=foo, foods=[]) User(id=4, tenant_id=2, name=bar, foods=[])]
// [a8m nati]
// 2
// [foo bar]
// 2
// 4
// [User(id=1, tenant_id=1, name=a8m, foods=[pizza]) User(id=2, tenant_id=1, name=nati, foods=[pizza])]
// [User(id=3, tenant_id=2, name=foo, foods=[]) User(id=4, tenant_id=2, name=bar, foods=[])]
// 2 0
// 2
}
We finish our example with another privacy-rule named DenyMismatchedTenants
on the Group
schema. The DenyMismatchedTenants
rule rejects group creation if the associated users do not belong to the same tenant as the group.
examples/privacytenant/rule/rule.go
// DenyMismatchedTenants is a rule that runs only on create operations and returns a deny
// decision if the operation tries to add users to groups that are not in the same tenant.
func DenyMismatchedTenants() privacy.MutationRule {
return privacy.GroupMutationRuleFunc(func(ctx context.Context, m *ent.GroupMutation) error {
tid, exists := m.TenantID()
if !exists {
return privacy.Denyf("missing tenant information in mutation")
}
users := m.UsersIDs()
// If there are no users in the mutation, skip this rule-check.
if len(users) == 0 {
return privacy.Skip
}
// Query the tenant-ids of all attached users. Expect all users to be connected to the same tenant
// as the group. Note, we use privacy.DecisionContext to skip the FilterTenantRule defined above.
ids, err := m.Client().User.Query().Where(user.IDIn(users...)).Select(user.FieldTenantID).Ints(privacy.DecisionContext(ctx, privacy.Allow))
if err != nil {
return privacy.Denyf("querying the tenant-ids %v", err)
}
if len(ids) != len(users) {
return privacy.Denyf("one the attached users is not connected to a tenant %v", err)
}
for _, id := range ids {
if id != tid {
return privacy.Denyf("mismatch tenant-ids for group/users %d != %d", tid, id)
}
}
// Skip to the next privacy rule (equivalent to return nil).
return privacy.Skip
})
}
We add this rule to the Group
schema and run code-generation.
examples/privacytenant/ent/schema/group.go
// Policy defines the privacy policy of the Group.
func (Group) Policy() ent.Policy {
return privacy.Policy{
Mutation: privacy.MutationPolicy{
// Limit DenyMismatchedTenants only for
// Create operation
privacy.OnMutationOperation(
rule.DenyMismatchedTenants(),
ent.OpCreate,
),
},
}
}
Again, we expect the privacy-rules to take effect on the client operations.
examples/privacytenant/example_test.go
func Example_DenyMismatchedTenants(ctx context.Context, client *ent.Client) {
// Operation should pass successfully as the user in the viewer-context
// is an admin user. First mutation privacy policy in Tenant schema.
adminCtx := viewer.NewContext(ctx, viewer.UserViewer{Role: viewer.Admin})
hub := client.Tenant.Create().SetName("GitHub").SaveX(adminCtx)
lab := client.Tenant.Create().SetName("GitLab").SaveX(adminCtx)
// Create 2 tenant-specific viewer contexts.
hubView := viewer.NewContext(ctx, viewer.UserViewer{T: hub})
labView := viewer.NewContext(ctx, viewer.UserViewer{T: lab})
// Create 2 users in each tenant.
hubUsers := client.User.CreateBulk(
client.User.Create().SetName("a8m").SetTenant(hub),
client.User.Create().SetName("nati").SetTenant(hub),
).SaveX(hubView)
fmt.Println(hubUsers)
labUsers := client.User.CreateBulk(
client.User.Create().SetName("foo").SetTenant(lab),
client.User.Create().SetName("bar").SetTenant(lab),
).SaveX(labView)
fmt.Println(labUsers)
// Expect operation to fail as the DenyMismatchedTenants rule makes
// sure the group and the users are connected to the same tenant.
if err := client.Group.Create().SetName("entgo.io").SetTenant(hub).AddUsers(labUsers...).Exec(hubView); !errors.Is(err, privacy.Deny) {
log.Fatal("expect operation to fail, since labUsers are not connected to the same tenant")
}
if err := client.Group.Create().SetName("entgo.io").SetTenant(hub).AddUsers(hubUsers[0], labUsers[0]).Exec(hubView); !errors.Is(err, privacy.Deny) {
log.Fatal("expect operation to fail, since labUsers[0] is not connected to the same tenant")
}
// Expect mutation to pass as all users belong to the same tenant as the group.
entgo := client.Group.Create().SetName("entgo.io").SetTenant(hub).AddUsers(hubUsers...).SaveX(hubView)
fmt.Println(entgo)
// Output:
// [User(id=1, tenant_id=1, name=a8m, foods=[]) User(id=2, tenant_id=1, name=nati, foods=[])]
// [User(id=3, tenant_id=2, name=foo, foods=[]) User(id=4, tenant_id=2, name=bar, foods=[])]
// Group(id=1, tenant_id=1, name=entgo.io)
}
In some cases, we want to reject user operations on entities that do not belong to their tenant without loading these entities from the database (unlike the DenyMismatchedTenants
example above). To achieve this, we rely on the FilterTenantRule
rule to add its filtering on mutations as well, and expect operations to fail with NotFoundError
in case the tenant_id
column does not match the one stored in the viewer-context.
examples/privacytenant/example_test.go
func Example_DenyMismatchedView(ctx context.Context, client *ent.Client) {
// Continuation of the code above.
// Expect operation to fail, because the FilterTenantRule rule makes sure
// that tenants can update and delete only their groups.
if err := entgo.Update().SetName("fail.go").Exec(labView); !ent.IsNotFound(err) {
log.Fatal("expect operation to fail, since the group (entgo) is managed by a different tenant (hub), but got:", err)
}
// Operation should pass in case it was applied with the right viewer-context.
entgo = entgo.Update().SetName("entgo").SaveX(hubView)
fmt.Println(entgo)
// Output:
// Group(id=1, tenant_id=1, name=entgo)
}
The full example exists in GitHub.
Please note that this documentation is under active development.