Index Signatures
An Object
in JavaScript (and hence TypeScript) can be accessed with a string to hold a reference to any other JavaScript object.
Here is a quick example:
let foo:any = {};
foo['Hello'] = 'World';
console.log(foo['Hello']); // World
We store a string "World"
under the key "Hello"
. Remember we said it can store any JavaScript object, so lets store a class instance just to show the concept:
class Foo {
constructor(public message: string){};
log(){
console.log(this.message)
}
}
let foo:any = {};
foo['Hello'] = new Foo('World');
foo['Hello'].log(); // World
Also remember that we said that it can be accessed with a string. If you pass some any other object to the index signature the JavaScript runtime actually calls .toString
on it before getting the result. This is demonstrated below:
let obj = {
toString(){
console.log('toString called')
return 'Hello'
}
}
let foo:any = {};
foo[obj] = 'World'; // toString called
console.log(foo[obj]); // toString called, World
console.log(foo['Hello']); // World
Note that toString
will get called whenever the obj
is used in an index position.
Arrays are slightly different. For number
indexing JavaScript VMs will try to optimise (depending on things like is it actually an array and do the structures of items stored match etc.). So number
should be considered as a valid object accessor in its own right (distinct from string
). Here is a simple array example:
let foo = ['World'];
console.log(foo[0]); // World
So that’s JavaScript. Now let’s look at TypeScript graceful handling of this concept.
TypeScript Index Signature
First off, because JavaScript implicitly calls toString
on any object index signature, TypeScript will give you an error to prevent beginners from shooting themselves in the foot (I see users shooting themselves in their feet when using JavaScript all the time on stackoverflow):
let obj = {
toString(){
return 'Hello'
}
}
let foo:any = {};
// ERROR: the index signature must be string, number ...
foo[obj] = 'World';
// FIX: TypeScript forces you to be explicit
foo[obj.toString()] = 'World';
The reason for forcing the user to be explicit is because the default toString
implementation on an object is pretty awful, e.g. on v8 it always returns [object Object]
:
let obj = {message:'Hello'}
let foo:any = {};
// ERROR: the index signature must be string, number ...
foo[obj] = 'World';
// Here is what you actually stored!
console.log(foo["[object Object]"]); // World
Of course number
is supported because
- its needed for excellent Array / Tuple support.
- even if you use it for an
obj
its defaulttoString
implementation is nice (not[object Object]
).
Point 2 is shown below:
console.log((1).toString()); // 1
console.log((2).toString()); // 2
So lesson 1:
TypeScript index signatures must be either
string
ornumber
Quick note: symbols
are also valid and supported by TypeScript. But let’s not go there just yet. Baby steps.
Declaring an index signature
So we’ve been using any
to tell TypeScript to let us do whatever we want. We can actually specify an index signature explicitly. E.g. say you want to make sure than anything that is stored in an object using a string conforms to the structure {message: string}
. This can be done with the declaration { [index:string] : {message: string} }
. This is demonstrated below:
let foo:{ [index:string] : {message: string} } = {};
/**
* Must store stuff that conforms the structure
*/
/** Ok */
foo['a'] = { message: 'some message' };
/** Error: must contain a `message` or type string. You have a typo in `message` */
foo['a'] = { messages: 'some message' };
/**
* Stuff that is read is also type checked
*/
/** Ok */
foo['a'].message;
/** Error: messages does not exist. You have a typo in `message` */
foo['a'].messages;
TIP: the name of the index signature e.g.
index
in{ [index:string] : {message: string} }
has no significance for TypeScript and really for readability. e.g. if its user names you can do{ [username:string] : {message: string} }
to help the next dev who looks at the code (which just might happen to be you).
Of course number
indexes are also supported e.g. { [count: number] : SomeOtherTypeYouWantToStoreEgRebate }
All members must conform to the string
index signature
As soon as you have a string
index signature, all explicit members must also conform to that index signature. This is shown below:
/** Okay */
interface Foo {
[key:string]: number
x: number;
y: number;
}
/** Error */
interface Bar {
[key:string]: number
x: number;
y: string; // ERROR: Property `y` must be of type number
}
This is to provide safety so that any string access gives the same result:
interface Foo {
[key:string]: number
x: number;
}
let foo: Foo = {x:1,y:2};
// Directly
foo['x']; // number
// Indirectly
let x = 'x'
foo[x]; // number
Using a limited set of string literals
An index signature can require that index strings be members of a union of literal strings by using Mapped Types e.g.:
type Index = 'a' | 'b' | 'c'
type FromIndex = { [k in Index]?: number }
const good: FromIndex = {b:1, c:2}
// Error:
// Type '{ b: number; c: number; d: number; }' is not assignable to type 'FromIndex'.
// Object literal may only specify known properties, and 'd' does not exist in type 'FromIndex'.
const bad: FromIndex = {b:1, c:2, d:3};
This is often used together with keyof typeof
to capture vocabulary types, described on the next page.
The specification of the vocabulary can be deferred generically:
type FromSomeIndex<K extends string> = { [key in K]: number }
Having both string
and number
indexers
This is not a common use case, but TypeScript compiler supports it nonetheless.
However it has the restriction that the string
indexer is more strict than the number
indexer. This is intentional e.g. to allow typing stuff like:
interface ArrStr {
[key: string]: string | number; // Must accomodate all members
[index: number]: string; // Can be a subset of string indexer
// Just an example member
length: number;
}
Design Pattern: Nested index signature
API consideration when adding index signatures
Quite commonly in the JS community you will see APIs that abuse string indexers. e.g. a common pattern among CSS in JS libraries:
interface NestedCSS {
color?: string;
[selector: string]: string | NestedCSS;
}
const example: NestedCSS = {
color: 'red',
'.subclass': {
color: 'blue'
}
}
Try not to mix string indexers with valid values this way. E.g. a typo in the padding will remain uncaught:
const failsSilently: NestedCSS = {
colour: 'red', // No error as `colour` is a valid string selector
}
Instead seperate out the nesting into its own property e.g. in a name like nest
(or children
or subnodes
etc.):
interface NestedCSS {
color?: string;
nest?: {
[selector: string]: NestedCSS;
}
}
const example: NestedCSS = {
color: 'red',
nest: {
'.subclass': {
color: 'blue'
}
}
}
const failsSilently: NestedCSS = {
colour: 'red', // TS Error: unknown property `colour`
}